Implementing the NHS Information Technology Programme: Qualitative Study of Progress in Acute Trusts

Innovation Studies Centre, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 17.45). 07/2007; 334(7608):1360. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39195.598461.551
Source: PubMed


To describe progress and perceived challenges in implementing the NHS information and technology (IT) programme in England.
Case studies and in-depth interviews, with themes identified using a framework developed from grounded theory. We interviewed personnel who had been interviewed 18 months earlier, or new personnel in the same posts.
Four NHS acute hospital trusts in England.
Senior trust managers and clinicians, including chief executives, directors of IT, medical directors, and directors of nursing.
Interviewees unreservedly supported the goals of the programme but had several serious concerns. As before, implementation is hampered by local financial deficits, delays in implementing patient administration systems that are compliant with the programme, and poor communication between Connecting for Health (the agency responsible for the programme) and local managers. New issues were raised. Local managers cannot prioritise implementing the programme because of competing financial priorities and uncertainties about the programme. They perceive a growing risk to patients' safety associated with delays and a loss of integration of components of the programme, and are discontented with Choose and Book (electronic booking for referrals from primary care).
We recommend that the programme sets realistic timetables for individual trusts and advises managers about interim IT systems they have to purchase because of delays outside their control. Advice needs to be mindful of the need for trusts to ensure longer term compatibility with the programme and value for money. Trusts need assistance in prioritising modernisation of IT by, for example, including implementation of the programme in the performance management framework. Even with Connecting for Health adopting a different approach of setting central standards with local implementation, these issues will still need to be addressed. Lessons learnt in the NHS have wider relevance as healthcare systems, such as in France and Australia, look to realise the potential of large scale IT modernisation.

Download full-text


Available from: Jane Hendy,
75 Reads
  • Source
    • "With rising acceptability, eHealth and mHealth initiatives are steadily emerging in both developing and highly industrialized countries, though with variable and sometimes counter-intuitive outcomes. For example, while there is evidence that an SMS based sentinel system has substantially improved disease surveillance in Madagascar [32], the highly sophisticated UK National Health System recently had to abandon a major national IT program to centralize patient records in midcourse [33,34]. In Bangladesh, WHO reported that the MoHFW reached 98% of its target population through SMS on health education but did not provide messages in Bangla, which is the first language of the majority of the population [14]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The health system of Bangladesh is haunted by challenges of accessibility and affordability. Despite impressive gains in many health indicators, recent evidence has raised concerns regarding the utilization, quality and equity of healthcare. In the context of new and unfamiliar public health challenges including high population density and rapid urbanization, eHealth and mHealth are being promoted as a route to cost-effective, equitable and quality healthcare in Bangladesh. The aim of this paper is to highlight such initiatives and understand their true potential. Methods This scoping study applies a combination of research tools to explore 26 eHealth and mHealth initiatives in Bangladesh. A screening matrix was developed by modifying the framework of Arksey & O’Malley, further complemented by case study and SWOT analysis to identify common traits among the selected interventions. The WHO health system building blocks approach was then used for thematic analysis of these traits. Results Findings suggest that most eHealth and mHealth initiatives have proliferated within the private sector, using mobile phones. The most common initiatives include tele-consultation, prescription and referral. While a minority of projects have a monitoring and evaluation framework, less than a quarter have undertaken evaluation. Most of the initiatives use a health management information system (HMIS) to monitor implementation. However, these do not provide for effective sharing of information and interconnectedness among the various actors. There are extremely few individuals with eHealth training in Bangladesh and there is a strong demand for capacity building and experience sharing, especially for implementation and policy making. There is also a lack of research evidence on how to design interventions to meet the needs of the population and on potential benefits. Conclusion This study concludes that Bangladesh needs considerable preparation and planning to sustain eHealth and mHealth initiatives successfully. Additional formative and operational research is essential to explore the true potential of the technology. Frameworks for regulation in regards to eHealth governance should be the aim of future research on the integration of eHealth and mHealth into the Bangladesh health system.
    BMC Health Services Research 06/2014; 14:260. DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-14-260 · 1.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Outline of deliverables within the NHS IT programme (Hendy, Fulop, Reeves, Hutchings, & Collins, 2007) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This essay analyses the strengths, weaknesses and benefits of using Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) for Digital Mammography in England. In addition, to examining through a case study the clinical and non clinical value of PACS in supporting digital diagnostic screening in a particular secondary care setting.
  • Source
    • "The interview framework was developed by drawing on previous research on the adoption and diffusion of complex health service innovations, including the NHS information technology programme and remote care implementation [17] [18]. Where possible individual interviews were recorded and transcribed, when not possible (for example because participants were situated in a call centre) notes were taken. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives Our work explores the gap between evidence, management practices and the adoption of innovations. The article draws on the results of a longitudinal study examining the adoption of remote care (telecare) services. Method Five UK organisations form purposively chosen case studies. In the process of adoption, we explore how managers interpret and construct evidence to inform practice. Results Managerial interpretations of evidence are negotiated through a series of interlinked frames of practice. These frames align evidence with existing professional practices and needs, and mobilise collective decision-making and strategic action. Conclusions The degree to which resulting managerial practice is consistent with aims and objectives of the recipient organisation serves to mediate innovation spread.
    Health Policy and Technology 12/2013; 2(4):216–221. DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.07.004
Show more