The association between weight history and physical performance in the Health, Aging and Body Composition study.

Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1207, USA.
International Journal of Obesity (Impact Factor: 5.22). 11/2007; 31(11):1680-7. DOI:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803652
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although the association between current obesity and physical disability is well known, the cumulative effect of obesity is unknown. Using data from the Health, Aging and Body Composition study, we examined the association between weight history in young and middle adulthood and weight status in late adulthood with physical performance in late adulthood.
Longitudinal cohort study.Subjects:White and black men and women aged 70-79 years at study baseline (n=2803).
Body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) was calculated using recalled height at age 25 and weight at age 25 and 50 and measured height and weight at ages 70-79. Physical performance at ages 70-79 was assessed using a short physical performance battery (SPPB) and a 400-m walk test.
In this well-functioning cohort, approximately 24% of men and 8% of women reported being overweight or obese (BMI > or =25 kg/m(2)) at age 25, 51% of men and 37% of women reported being overweight or obese at age 50, and 69% of men and 66% of women were overweight or obese at ages 70-79. Men and women who were obese (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)) at ages 25, 50 and 70-79 had significantly worse SPPB scores and 400-m walk times than those who were normal weight. Women who were overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) at ages 25, 50 and 70-79 also had significantly worse physical performance. Furthermore, men and women who had a history of being overweight or obese at ages 25 or 50 had worse physical performance compared to those who were normal weight throughout or who were overweight or obese at ages 70-79 but not in midlife or earlier.
Maintaining a healthy body weight throughout adulthood may play a role in preventing or delaying the onset of physical disability.

0 0
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Little is known about limitations in physical function across BMI categories in middle aged women using both self-report and performance-based measures. Furthermore, the impact of BMI on the measurement of function has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to assess physical function in adult women across BMI categories using self-report and performance-based measures and determine the influence of BMI on the relationship between the measures. Methods: Fifty sedentary females (10 in each BMI category: normal weight, overweight, obese class I, II, and III) aged 51.2 ± 5.4 years participated. Assessments included demographics, past medical history, physical activity level, BMI, and self-report (Late Life Function and Disability Instrument) and performance-based measures of physical function (6-Minute Walk Test, timed chair rise, gait speed). Physical function was compared between BMI categories using analysis of variance. The influence of BMI on the relationship of self-report and performance-based measures was analyzed using linear regression. Results: Compared to those that were normal weight or overweight, individuals with obesity scored lower on the self-report measure of physical function (LLFDI) for capability in participating in life tasks and ability to perform discrete functional activities. On the performance-based measures, the individuals with obesity had slower gait speed compared to the normal and overweight weight groups. For the 6-Minute Walk Test and timed chair stands, individuals with obesity had poorer performance compared to those who were normal weight. Linear regression analyses revealed that BMI attenuated the relationship between the self-report and performance-based measures by approximately 50%. Conclusions: While those with severe obesity were most impaired, adult women with less severe obesity also demonstrated significant decrements in physical function.
    Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal. 09/2011; 22(3):11-20.
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the association between obesity history and hand grip strength, and whether the association is partly explained by subclinical inflammation and insulin resistance. Data are from 2,021 men and women aged 55 years and older participating in the representative population-based Health 2000 Survey in Finland. Body mass and body height, maximal hand grip strength, C-reactive protein, and insulin resistance based on homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) were measured in a health examination. Recalled weight at 20, 30, 40, and 50 years of age were recorded to obtain a hierarchical classification of obesity history. Obesity was defined as body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m². Earlier onset of obesity was associated with lower hand grip strength (p < .001) after controlling for age, sex, education, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, several chronic diseases, and current body weight. Based on adjusted logistic regression models, the odds (95% confidence interval) for very low relative hand grip strength were 2.76 (1.78-4.28) for currently obese, 5.57 (3.02-10.28) for obese since age of 50 years, 6.53 (2.98-14.30) for obese since age of 40 years, and 10.36 (3.55-30.24) for obese since age of 30 years compared with never obese participants. The associations remained highly significant even after adjusting for current C-reactive protein and HOMA-IR, but these variables had only minor role in explaining the association between obesity history and hand grip strength. Long-term exposure to obesity is associated with poor hand grip strength later in life. Maintaining healthy body weight throughout the life span may help to maintain adequate muscle strength in old age. Prospective studies with information on prior muscle strength are needed to examine in detail the causal association between obesity history and muscle strength.
    The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 03/2011; 66(3):341-8. · 4.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the associations of body mass index (BMI) and grip strength with objective measures of physical performance (chair rise time, walking speed and balance) including an assessment of sex differences and non-linearity. Cross-sectional data from eight UK cohort studies (total N = 16 444) participating in the Healthy Ageing across the Life Course (HALCyon) research programme, ranging in age from 50 to 90+ years at the time of physical capability assessment, were used. Regression models were fitted within each study and meta-analysis methods used to pool regression coefficients across studies and to assess the extent of heterogeneity between studies. Higher BMI was associated with poorer performance on chair rise (N = 10 773), walking speed (N = 9 761) and standing balance (N = 13 921) tests. Higher BMI was associated with stronger grip strength in men only. Stronger grip strength was associated with better performance on all tests with a tendency for the associations to be stronger in women than men; for example, walking speed was higher by 0.43 cm/s (0.14, 0.71) more per kg in women than men. Both BMI and grip strength remained independently related with performance after mutual adjustment, but there was no evidence of effect modification. Both BMI and grip strength exhibited non-linear relations with performance; those in the lowest fifth of grip strength and highest fifth of BMI having particularly poor performance. Findings were similar when waist circumference was examined in place of BMI. Older men and women with weak muscle strength and high BMI have considerably poorer performance than others and associations were observed even in the youngest cohort (age 53). Although causality cannot be inferred from observational cross-sectional studies, our findings suggest the likely benefit of early assessment and interventions to reduce fat mass and improve muscle strength in the prevention of future functional limitations.
    PLoS ONE 01/2013; 8(2):e56483. · 3.73 Impact Factor


Available from