Article

Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and psychological adjustment

Department of Psychology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States
Emotion (Impact Factor: 3.88). 06/2007; 7(2):262-74. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.262
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT How people's feelings change across time can be represented as trajectories in a core affect space defined by the dimensions of valence and activation. In this article, the authors analyzed individual differences in within-person affective variability defined as characteristics of core affect trajectories, introducing new ways to conceptualize affective variability. In 2 studies, participants provided multiple reports across time describing how they were feeling in terms of core affect. From these data, characteristics of participants' core affect trajectories were derived. Across both studies, core affect variability was negatively related to average valence, self-esteem, and agreeableness, and it was positively related to neuroticism and depression. Moreover, spin, a measure of how much people experienced qualitatively different feelings within the core affect space, was related more consistently to trait measures of adjustment and personality than other measures of within-person variability, including widely used measures of within-person single-dimension standard deviations.

2 Followers
 · 
156 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Personality features are associated with individual differences in daily emotional life, such as negative and positive affectivity, affect variability and affect reactivity. The existing literature is somewhat mixed and inconclusive about the nature of these associations. The aim of this study was to shed light on what personality features represent in daily life by investigating the effect of the Five Factor traits on different daily emotional processes using an ecologically valid method. The Experience Sampling Method was used to collect repeated reports of daily affect and experiences from 104 healthy university students during one week of their normal lives. Personality traits of the Five Factor model were assessed using NEO Five Factor Inventory. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to analyze the effect of the personality traits on daily emotional processes. Neuroticism predicted higher negative and lower positive affect, higher affect variability, more negative subjective evaluations of daily incidents, and higher reactivity to stressors. Conscientiousness, by contrast, predicted lower average level, variability, and reactivity of negative affect. Agreeableness was associated with higher positive and lower negative affect, lower variability of sadness, and more positive subjective evaluations of daily incidents. Extraversion predicted higher positive affect and more positive subjective evaluations of daily activities. Openness had no effect on average level of affect, but predicted higher reactivity to daily stressors. The results show that the personality features independently predict different aspects of daily emotional processes. Neuroticism was associated with all of the processes. Identifying these processes can help us to better understand individual differences in daily emotional life.
    PLoS ONE 10/2014; 9(10):e110907. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0110907 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Not only how good or bad people feel on average, but also how their feelings fluctuate across time is crucial for psychological health. The last 2 decades have witnessed a surge in research linking various patterns of short-term emotional change to adaptive or maladaptive psychological functioning, often with conflicting results. A meta-analysis was performed to identify consistent relationships between patterns of short-term emotion dynamics-including patterns reflecting emotional variability (measured in terms of within-person standard deviation of emotions across time), emotional instability (measured in terms of the magnitude of consecutive emotional changes), and emotional inertia of emotions over time (measured in terms of autocorrelation)-and relatively stable indicators of psychological well-being or psychopathology. We determined how such relationships are moderated by the type of emotional change, type of psychological well-being or psychopathology involved, valence of the emotion, and methodological factors. A total of 793 effect sizes were identified from 79 articles (N = 11,381) and were subjected to a 3-level meta-analysis. The results confirmed that overall, low psychological well-being co-occurs with more variable (overall ρ̂ = -.178), unstable (overall ρ̂ = -.205), but also more inert (overall ρ̂ = -.151) emotions. These effect sizes were stronger when involving negative compared with positive emotions. Moreover, the results provided evidence for consistency across different types of psychological well-being and psychopathology in their relation with these dynamical patterns, although specificity was also observed. The findings demonstrate that psychological flourishing is characterized by specific patterns of emotional fluctuations across time, and provide insight into what constitutes optimal and suboptimal emotional functioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    Psychological Bulletin 03/2015; DOI:10.1037/a0038822 · 14.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to investigate how the emotional responses of drivers, from both dimensional and discrete perspectives, may be predicted by using the appraisal components of goal relevance, blame party, and certainty. Traffic scenarios representing a combination of the three appraisal components were designed and presented to participants. The emotional responses to each scenario were measured on an Arousal–Valence emotional space and were assigned with discrete emotion labels by applying a cluster analysis. For the dimensional model, the results showed that valence was significantly associated with the blame party and the goal relevance components. The arousal was, as hypothesised, predicted by the blame party and the certainty components. For the discrete model, it was found that driving anger was most likely to be provoked when other drivers were responsible for the adverse driving outcome; driving fear was most commonly experienced in situations where driver safety was threatened by the driver himself/herself or by impersonal circumstance; and driving anxiety was an outcome of uncertain arrival-blocking events caused by driver himself/herself or impersonal circumstance. Findings from this study suggest the feasibility of predicting emotional dimensions on the basis of the appraisal process. Moreover, this study contributes to the research on driver emotion by demonstrating that the certainty feature of traffic events plays an important role in determining the emotional responses of drivers.
    Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 11/2014; 27:112–123. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.012 · 1.99 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
56 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014