Article

Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.

Division of Urology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103-8897, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 06/2007; 356(21):2143-55. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa070416
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many surgical procedures are available for women with urinary stress incontinence, yet few randomized clinical trials have been conducted to provide a basis for treatment recommendations.
We performed a multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing two procedures--the pubovaginal sling, using autologous rectus fascia, and the Burch colposuspension--among women with stress incontinence. Women were eligible for the study if they had predominant symptoms associated with the condition, a positive stress test, and urethral hypermobility. The primary outcomes were success in terms of overall urinary-incontinence measures, which required a negative pad test, no urinary incontinence (as recorded in a 3-day diary), a negative cough and Valsalva stress test, no self-reported symptoms, and no retreatment for the condition, and success in terms of measures of stress incontinence specifically, which required only the latter three criteria. We also assessed postoperative urge incontinence, voiding dysfunction, and adverse events.
A total of 655 women were randomly assigned to study groups: 326 to undergo the sling procedure and 329 to undergo the Burch procedure; 520 women (79%) completed the outcome assessment. At 24 months, success rates were higher for women who underwent the sling procedure than for those who underwent the Burch procedure, for both the overall category of success (47% vs. 38%, P=0.01) and the category specific to stress incontinence (66% vs. 49%, P<0.001). However, more women who underwent the sling procedure had urinary tract infections, difficulty voiding, and postoperative urge incontinence.
The autologous fascial sling results in a higher rate of successful treatment of stress incontinence but also greater morbidity than the Burch colposuspension. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00064662 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .).

0 Bookmarks
 · 
175 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary tract infection (UTI) are important problems, estimated to affect around 14 and 40 % of women, respectively, at some point in their lives. Positive urine culture in the presence of symptoms is the cornerstone of diagnosis of UTI and should be performed along with ultrasound assessment of postvoid residual (PVR) in all women presenting with POP and UTI. PVR over 30 mL is an independent risk factor for UTI, although no specific association with POP and UTI has been demonstrated. The use of prophylactic antibiotics remains controversial. The major risk factors for postoperative UTI are postoperative catheterisation, prolonged catheterisation, previous recurrent UTI and an increased urethro-anal distance-suggesting that global pelvic floor dysfunction may play a role.
    Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports 09/2014; 9(3):175-180. DOI:10.1007/s11884-014-0249-4
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a major problem affecting more than 20% of the nation's female population, with increasing prevalence as our population continues to age. Incontinence places a great burden on individuals, and the economic effect is large. Stress urinary incontinence occurs when there is involuntary leakage of urine during coughing, laughing, sneezing, or physical activity. It can be diagnosed during physical examination and by using low-cost office diagnostics. Although nonsurgical treatments provide some benefit, surgical interventions have demonstrated superiority with respect to subjective and objective cure and better long-term improvement. Corrective surgeries for SUI can be grouped into four categories: 1) slings (midurethral slings and slings placed at the ureterovesical junction), 2) retropubic urethropexy, 3) urethral bulking agents, and 4) artificial sphincters. The success and failure of each approach needs to be assessed in the context of individual patients and their circumstances. Slings and retropubic urethropexy are considered first-line surgical options. Since the advent of minimally invasive retropubic midurethral slings such as the tension-free vaginal tape, transobturator tension-free vaginal tape, and single-incision sling, retropubic urethropexy have fallen out of favor. Warnings about mesh use may contribute to a resurgence of retropubic urethropexy procedures such as the Burch procedure. A Burch procedure should still be considered for patients who have an aversion to mesh or if they are undergoing concurrent abdominal approach surgery. Urethral bulking agents are usually reserved for patients with a fixed, nonmobile urethra who cannot tolerate an operative experience or have failed previous antiincontinence procedures. Artificial sphincters should be considered an operation of last resort.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 11/2014; 124(5):1011-27. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000514 · 4.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Numerous surgical procedures are available for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women and men. On a par with classical therapy options (e.g. colposuspension and artificial sphincter prosthesis) suburethral tape procedures have become established as the minimally invasive standard of care. Regarding comorbidities and recurrent urinary incontinence, therapeutic procedures should be modified on an individual basis. It is crucial to involve patients in therapeutic decision-making and counseling should be given with respect to all conservative and operative alternatives.
    Der Urologe 10/2014; 53(11). DOI:10.1007/s00120-014-3607-0 · 0.44 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
3 Downloads
Available from
Feb 10, 2015