Article

Patient and kidney survival by dialysis modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo - Japan.
The International journal of artificial organs (Impact Factor: 1.45). 05/2007; 30(4):281-92.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Using a large, international cohort, we sought to determine the effect of initial technique of renal replacement therapy (RRT) on the outcome of acute renal failure (ARF) in the intensive care unit (ICU). We enrolled 1218 patients treated with continuous RRT (CRRT) or intermittent RRT (IRRT) for ARF in 54 ICUs in 23 countries. We obtained demographic, biochemical and clinical data and followed patients to either death or hospital discharge. Information was analyzed to assess the independent impact of treatment choice on survival and renal recovery. Patients treated first with CRRT (N=1006, 82.6%) required vasopressor drugs and mechanical ventilation more frequently compared to those receiving IRRT (N=212, 17.4%), (p<0.0001). Unadjusted hospital survival was lower (35.8% vs. 51.9%, p<0.0001). However, unadjusted dialysis-independence at hospital discharge was higher after CRRT (85.5% vs. 66.2%, p<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression showed that choice of CRRT was not an independent predictor of hospital survival or dialysis-free hospital survival. However, the choice of CRRT was a predictor of dialysis independence at hospital discharge among survivors (OR: 3.333, 95% CI: 1.845 - 6.024, p<0.0001). Further adjustment using a propensity score did not significantly change these results. We conclude that worldwide, the choice of CRRT as initial therapy is not a predictor of hospital survival or dialysis-free hospital survival but is an independent predictor of renal recovery among survivors.

3 Bookmarks
 · 
379 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was undertaken to assess recent trends of the choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities in Japanese intensive care units (ICUs). Data were extracted from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database for 2011. We identified adult patients without end-stage renal disease who had been admitted to ICUs for 3 days or longer and started continuous RRT (CRRT) or intermittent RRT (IRRT). Logistic regression was used to analyze which factors affected the modality choice. We further evaluated in-hospital mortality according to the choice of RRT. Of 7353 eligible patients, 5854 (79.6%) initially received CRRT. The choice of CRRT was independently associated with sex (female), diagnosis of sepsis, hospital type (academic) and volume, vasoactive agents, mechanical ventilation, colloid administration, blood transfusion, intra-aortic balloon pumping, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Particularly, the number of vasoactive drugs was strongly associated with the CRRT choice. Overall in-hospital mortality in the CRRT group was higher than that in the IRRT group (50.0% vs 31.1%) and was increased when IRRT was switched to CRRT (59.1%). Continuous RRT is apparently preferred in actual ICU practice, especially for hemodynamically unstable patients, and subsequent RRT modality switch is associated with mortality. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Critical Care 11/2014; 30(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.11.003 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This is a guideline for the management of sepsis, developed by the Sepsis Registry Committee of The Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (JSICM) launched in March 2007. This guideline was developed on the basis of evidence-based medicine and focuses on unique treatments in Japan that have not been included in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (SSCG), as well as treatments that are viewed differently in Japan and in Western countries. Although the methods in this guideline conform to the 2008 SSCG, the Japanese literature and the results of the Sepsis Registry Survey, which was performed twice by the Sepsis Registry Committee in intensive care units (ICUs) registered with JSICM, are also referred. This is the first and original guideline for sepsis in Japan and is expected to be properly used in daily clinical practice. This article is translated from Japanese, originally published as "The Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis" in the Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (J Jpn Soc Intensive Care Med), 2013; 20:124-73. The original work is at http://dx.doi.org/10.3918/jsicm.20.124.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The obective of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing intermittent with continuous renal replacement therapy (IRRT versus CRRT) as initial therapy for acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU).
    Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 10/2014; 30(1). DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfu314 · 3.49 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
404 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014