Increased rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with use of a needleless mechanical valve device at a long-term acute care hospital.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 3.94). 07/2007; 28(6):684-8. DOI: 10.1086/516800
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine whether introduction of a needleless mechanical valve device (NMVD) at a long-term acute care hospital was associated with an increased frequency of catheter-related bloodstream infection (BSI).
For patients with a central venous catheter in place, the catheter-related BSI rate during the 24-month period before introduction of the NMVD, a period in which a needleless split-septum device (NSSD) was being used (hereafter, the NSSD period), was compared with the catheter-related BSI rate during the 24-month period after introduction of the NMVD (hereafter, the NMVD period). The microbiological characteristics of catheter-related BSIs during each period were also compared. Comparisons and calculations of relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed using chi (2) analysis.
Eighty-six catheter-related BSIs (3.86 infections per 1,000 catheter-days) occurred during the study period. The rate of catheter-related BSI during the NMVD period was significantly higher than that during the NSSD period (5.95 vs 1.79 infections per 1,000 catheter-days; RR, 3.32 [95% CI, 2.88-3.83]; P<.001). A significantly greater percentage of catheter-related BSIs during the NMVD period were caused by gram-negative organisms, compared with the percentage recorded during the NSSD period (39.5% vs 8%; P=.007). Among catheter-related BSIs due to gram-positive organisms, the percentage caused by enterococci was significantly greater during the NMVD period, compared with the NSSD period (54.8% vs 13.6%; P=.004). The catheter-related BSI rate remained high during the NMVD period despite several educational sessions regarding proper use of the NMVD.
An increased catheter-related BSI rate was temporally associated with use of a NMVD at the study hospital, despite several educational sessions regarding proper NMVD use. The current design of the NMVD may be unsafe for use in certain patient populations.

Download full-text


Available from: Cassandra D Salgado, Aug 13, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A reliable means of maintaining an intravascular access device (IVAD) is an important aspect of care for a patient in a long-term acute care (LTAC) setting. Overall, various authors have confirmed that complication rates are lower with use of an IVAD. The key to this success in low complication rates appears to be a team approach to catheter care and management. In our unique practice setting, LTAC, we have over 20 years of experience with IVAD care and management. In an extensive 15-year retrospective review of the IVAD care, we found very low rates of complications, including infections. This is directly related to a team approach to catheter care, protocol development, employee education, and postoperative management.
    Rehabilitation nursing: the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses 11/2012; 37(6):307-11. DOI:10.1002/rnj.57 · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of every health care facility is achieving and maintaining a zero central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate. Interventions to enhance care were put into place, and changes in CLABSI rates were tracked. Data were collected from January 2003 through June 2009. The interventions included the following: a dedicated vascular access team; swabbable clear positive displacement needleless connector; chlorhexidine-impregnated disk; flushing with 20 mL of normal saline; rigorous central line care education; increased use of peripherally inserted central catheters; and daily review of necessity. A significant drop to zero CLABSIs occurred after the introduction of several new central line care practices.
    Journal of infusion nursing: the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society 01/2010; 33(6):398-406. DOI:10.1097/NAN.0b013e3181f8586b
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 06/2005; 65(2):286-7. DOI:10.1002/ccd.20421 · 2.40 Impact Factor