Quality of life can both influence and be an outcome of general health perceptions after heart surgery.

The Interventional Centre, Faculty Division Rikshospitalet, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (Impact Factor: 2.1). 02/2007; 5:27. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-27
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Our aim was to investigate the existence of a reciprocal relationship between patients' assessment of quality of life and their appraisal of health. If present, this relationship will interfere with the interpretation of heart surgery's effect on overall quality of life.
Path analysis was used to investigate reciprocal causal relationships between general health perceptions and overall quality of life before and after heart surgery. Longitudinal data from a study of coronary artery bypass surgery were used to model lagged, cross-lagged, and simultaneous paths over four time-points of assessment from before surgery to one year afterwards. The conceptual framework for the analysis was the Wilson and Cleary causal pathway model. General health perceptions were measured with the Short Form 36. Overall quality of life was measured with i) a single question regarding life satisfaction and ii) the multi-item Quality of Life Survey.
Acceptable model fit was obtained for reciprocal causation between general health perceptions and overall quality of life. Regression coefficients changed over different phases of rehabilitation. Serial correlation accounted for much of the variance within variables over time.
The present analysis demonstrates that unidirectional models of causality are inadequate to explain the effect of heart surgery on overall quality of life. Overall quality of life can causally influence as well as be an outcome of health status after coronary artery bypass surgery.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With advances in operative technique and perioperative care, traditional endpoints such as morbidity and mortality provide an incomplete description of surgical outcomes. There is increasing emphasis on the need for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to evaluate fully the effectiveness and quality of surgical interventions. The objective of this study was to identify the outcomes reported in clinical studies published in high-impact surgical journals and the frequency with which PROs are used. Electronic versions of material published between 2008 and 2012 in the four highest-impact non-subspecialty surgical journals (Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Surgery (BJS), Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Surgery) were hand-searched. Clinical studies of adult patients undergoing planned abdominal, thoracic or vascular surgery were included. Reported outcomes were classified into five categories using Wilson and Cleary's conceptual model. A total of 893 articles were assessed, of which 770 were included in the analysis. Some 91·6 per cent of studies reported biological and physiological outcomes, 36·0 per cent symptoms, 13·4 per cent direct indicators of functional status, 10·6 per cent general health perception and 14·8 per cent overall quality of life (QoL). The proportion of studies with at least one PRO was 38·7 per cent overall and 73·4 per cent in BJS (P < 0·001). The proportion of studies using a formal measure of health-related QoL ranged from 8·9 per cent (JAMA Surgery) to 33·8 per cent (BJS). The predominant reporting of clinical endpoints and the inconsistent use of PROs underscore the need for further research and education to enhance the applicability of these measures in specific surgical settings.
    British Journal of Surgery 04/2014; 101(5). DOI:10.1002/bjs.9450 · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Instruments intended to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and health status are widely used in research and clinical practice, but with little conceptual guidance there is some uncertainty about what it is that these instruments are actually tapping. Causal models have the potential to provide the required conceptual guidance, not only placing commonly discussed health concepts on a firm scientific foundation, but also allowing medical and psychosocial interventions to be developed in a more focused and efficient manner. Several models, some postulating causal relations, have been proposed over many years, and some have been supported by data. The development and validation of these models has, however, been conducted in a piecemeal fashion. The imperative to develop tailored, cost-effective interventions requires a synthesized approach to developing and testing causal models.
    Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 10/2013; 13(5):631-40. DOI:10.1586/14737167.2013.838024 · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:The definition of health for people with cancer is not focused solely on the physiology of illness and the length of life remaining, but is also concerned with improving the well-being and the quality of the life (QOL) remaining to be lived. This study aimed to identify the constructs most associated with QOL in people with advanced cancer.Methods:Two hundred three persons with recent diagnoses of different advanced cancers were evaluated with 65 variables representing individual and environmental factors, biological factors, symptoms, function, general health perceptions and overall QOL at diagnosis. Three independent stepwise multiple linear regressions identified the most important contributors to overall QOL. R(2) ranking and effect sizes were estimated and averaged by construct.Results:The most important contributor of overall QOL for people recently diagnosed with advanced cancer was social support. It was followed by general health perceptions, energy, social function, psychological function and physical function.Conclusions:We used effect sizes to summarise multiple multivariate linear regressions for a more manageable and clinically interpretable picture. The findings emphasise the importance of incorporating the assessment and treatment of relevant symptoms, functions and social support in people recently diagnosed with advanced cancer as part of their clinical care.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication 16 April 2013; doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.146
    British Journal of Cancer 04/2013; DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.146 · 5.08 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014