Article

Expression of PAX2 in papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary: immunohistochemical evidence of fallopian tube or secondary Müllerian system origin?

Department of Pathology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Modern Pathology (Impact Factor: 6.36). 09/2007; 20(8):856-63. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800827
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT PAX2 is a urogenital developmental transcription factor expressed in the Wolffian ducts, developing kidneys, and Müllerian ducts during embryonic stage. Its function in renal development is well documented and its clinical application in the diagnosis of lesions of renal origin has been reported recently. However, information on its role in the Müllerian-derived genital tract is sparse. In this study, we investigated the expression of PAX2 in human female genital tract using immunohistochemistry. We demonstrated that PAX2 was expressed specifically in the epithelial cells of fallopian tube, endometrial and endocervical glands, but not in the stromal tissues in these areas. PAX2 was detected in secondary Müllerian structures in the ovary, such as endometriotic and endosalpingiotic glands and rete ovarii, but not in ovarian surface epithelium, surface epithelium-derived inclusion cysts, stroma, or sex-cord-derived structures such as follicles, oocytes, and corpus luteum. In addition, PAX2 was detected in 67% of ovarian papillary serous carcinomas (N=36) but rarely in peritoneal malignant mesotheliomas, with two exceptions (N=54). Interestingly, the two PAX2-positive 'peritoneal malignant mesotheliomas' were from female patients and were positive for estrogen receptor. The significance of expression of PAX2 and estrogen receptor in these cases is under investigation. Taken together, we suggest that PAX2 is a novel Müllerian-specific epithelial marker when used in proper clinical settings. Identification of PAX2 in the majority of papillary serous carcinomas of the ovary but not in the ovarian surface epithelium or epithelium-derived inclusion cysts suggests that this malignant epithelial tumor may be directly derived from the primary or secondary Müllerian epithelium in or surrounding the ovary, rather than from the surface epithelium or its derivatives.

Full-text

Available from: Alain charles Borczuk, Aug 04, 2014
0 Bookmarks
 · 
66 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Brenner tumours (BTs), like other epithelial ovarian tumours, are thought to develop from the ovarian surface epithelium. We hypothesised that BTs arise from transitional metaplasia near the tuboperitoneal junction which, when embedded in the ovary as Walthard cell nests, may progress to BTs. The aim of this study was to validate this hypothesis by a morphologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. The IHC analysis revealed that fallopian tube secretory cells, transitional metaplasia, Walthard cell nests and the epithelial component of BTs shared a similar IHC profile, consistently expressing AKR1C3 (an enzyme involved in androgen biosynthesis) and androgen receptor, but not calretinin. The tumour stromal cells that immediately surrounded the epithelial nests showed strong expression of calretinin, inhibin and steroidogenic factor 1 (markers of steroidogenic cells) in the majority of BTs. Using a highly sensitive immunofluorescent staining method, we detected small groups of cilia in transitional metaplasia and Walthard cell nests, multifocal stretches of cilia and/or ciliated vacuoles in benign BTs and well-developed cilia in atypical proliferative BTs. Our findings suggest a tubal origin of BTs through transitional metaplasia and Walthard cell nests, based on their anatomic proximity, similar IHC profile and the presence of cilia. In addition, we hypothesise a role of androgenic stimulation in the pathogenesis of BT, based on the IHC staining pattern of calretinin, inhibin and steroidogenic factor 1 expressed in the luteinised stromal cells surrounding the epithelial nests of the tumours, and AKR1C3 and androgen receptor expressed in both the epithelial and stromal components.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 09/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.011 · 4.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Recent studies have identified stem/progenitor cells in human and mouse uterine epithelium, which are postulated to be responsible for tissue regeneration and proliferative disorders of human endometrium. These progenitor cells are thought to be derived from Mü llerian duct (MD), the primordial female reproductive tract (FRT).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mesonephric remnants, usually located deep in the lateral cervical wall, may become hyperplastic resulting in a florid proliferation. These can be misinterpreted as malignant and confused with endocervical adenocarcinomas. Recent data have shown that PAX2 is diffusely expressed in mesonephric remnants and hyperplasias. PAX8 is a related transcription protein that is expressed in tissues of müllerian and wolffian origin. In this study, we have investigated the utility of an immunohistochemical panel comprising of PAX8, estrogen receptor (ER), and p16 in the differential diagnosis between mesonephric proliferations and cervical adenocarcinomas. A database search was conducted for cases of mesonephric remnants/hyperplasia/carcinoma of cervix and invasive cervical adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemical stains for PAX8, ER, and p16 were performed using the avidin-biotin peroxidase technique on the most representative tissue. The search yielded 28 cases of mesonephric proliferations of cervix (15 mesonephric remnants, 12 mesonephric hyperplasias, and 1 mesonephric adenocarcinoma) and 16 cases of cervical adenocarcinomas (15 usual type and 1 adenoma malignum). Immunohistochemically, all the mesonephric proliferations, regardless of being benign or malignant, displayed a consistent staining pattern-diffusely and strongly positive for PAX8, negative for ER, and patchy cytoplasmic staining for p16. The usual type cervical adenocarcinomas exhibited a variable staining pattern with PAX8 and ER but all were strongly and diffusely positive for p16. The case of adenoma malignum was PAX8 positive, ER negative, and showed weak and patchy staining with p16. Our study suggests that a panel of immunohistochemical stains composed of PAX8, p16, and ER is useful in the distinction between mesonephric proliferations and cervical adenocarcinomas.
    International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 09/2014; 33(6). DOI:10.1097/PGP.0000000000000102 · 1.63 Impact Factor