Article

Anaemia and renal dysfunction are independently associated with BNP and NT-proBNP levels in patients with heart failure.

Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
European Journal of Heart Failure (Impact Factor: 5.25). 08/2007; 9(8):787-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2007.04.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Anaemia may affect B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) levels, but this has not been well described in heart failure (HF) patients without the exclusion of patients with renal dysfunction.
To study the influence of both anaemia and renal function on BNP and NT-proBNP levels in a large group of hospitalised HF patients.
We studied 541 patients hospitalised for HF (mean age 71+/-11 years, 62% male, and left ventricular ejection fraction 0.33+/-0.14). Of these patients, 30% (n=159) were anaemic (women: Hb<7.5 mmol/l, men: Hb<8.1 mmol/l). Of the 159 anaemic patients, 73% had renal dysfunction (eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2) and of the non-anaemic patients, 57% had renal dysfunction. BNP and NT-proBNP levels were measured in all patients before discharge. In multivariable analyses both plasma haemoglobin and eGFR were independently related to the levels of BNP and NT-proBNP (standardised beta's of -0.16, -0.14 [BNP] and -0.19, -0.26 [NT-proBNP] respectively, P-values<0.01).
Anaemia and renal dysfunction are related to increased BNP and NT-proBNP levels, independent of the severity of HF. These results indicate that both anaemia and renal dysfunction should be taken into consideration during the interpretation of BNP and NT-proBNP levels in HF patients.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
50 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The management of patients with heart failure (HF) is complex and often benefits from a patient-tailored approach. Since the early 1990s, HF disease management programs have been developed and implemented to improve outcomes of patients with HF. The body of evidence of the effectiveness of these programs is still growing, but meta-analyses of disease management program studies show various results on outcomes. This raises questions regarding the optimal organizational structure and components of a most cost-effective HF management program. Case management has been described as a solution to improve outcomes in complex patients and as a possible link to effective disease management. This raises the question of what case management can add to the disease management of patients with HF and which patients might benefit. The aim of this article is to discuss the potential contribution of case management in the disease management of patients with HF.
    The Journal of cardiovascular nursing 24(2):127-31. · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: NT-proBNP is being used as a biomarker for prognosticating and delineating cardiac dysfunction. The cut-off value for deciding normal versus abnormal levels has always been a point of contention since it depends on the degree of dysfunction as well as other associated conditions often termed non-cardiac factors and parameters. Such association had not been formally presented. To determine the direction and magnitude of effect of cardiac and non-cardiac parameters on NT-proBNP variability. The present study included 78 cardiac ambulatory patients with a history of heart failure and/or low left ventricular ejection fraction. Their cardiac and non-cardiac parameters were recorded at the time of blood sampling for NT-proBNP. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to correlate cardiac and non-cardiac parameters with NT-proBNP level and, from this, a predictive equation was derived. Log [NT-proBNP (pmol/l)] was 1.424 + 0.348 (for EF of 18-27) + 0.636 (for EF < 18) + 0.021 CTR - 0.002 SMW- 0.326 for female + 0.430 Cr - 0.010 BW [EF = LV ejectionfraction in %; CTR = cardio-thoracic ratio in %; SMW = 6-minute walking distance in meters; Cr = serum creatinine in mg/dl; BW = body weight in kg]. The adjusted R-square for this regression was 0.659. Omitting the non-cardiac variables (sex, Cr, BW) would decrease the adjusted R-square to 0.493. Cut-off value for NT-proBNP concentration in subjects without severe systolic heart failure has to account for these non-cardiac factors.
    Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet 01/2009; 92(1):1-7.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: To determine the prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), in comparison to data in HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) EF (≥40%). BACKGROUND: Management of patients with HFPEF is difficult. BNP is a useful biomarker in patients with reduced LVEF, but data in HFPEF are scarce. METHODS: We studied 615 patients with mild to moderate HF (mean age 70 years, LVEF 33%), for 18 months. BNP concentrations were measured at baseline, and related to the primary outcome, i.e. a composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, and to mortality alone. The population was divided in quintiles, according to LVEF, and patients with reduced LVEF were compared to those with HFPEF. RESULTS: There were 257 patients (42%) who had a primary endpoint and 171 (28%) who died. BNP levels were significantly higher in patients with reduced LVEF than in those with HFPEF (P<0.001). BNP was a strong predictor of outcome, but LVEF was not. Importantly, if similar levels of BNP were compared across the whole spectrum of LVEF, and also for different cut-off levels of LVEF, the associated risk of adverse outcome was similar in HFPEF patients as in those with reduced LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: BNP levels are lower in HFPEF than in HF with reduced LVEF, but for a given BNP level, the prognosis in patients with HFPEF is as poor as in those with reduced LVEF.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 03/2013; · 14.09 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
2 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014