Outcome of cardioverter-defibrillator implant in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Istituto di Cardiologia, Università di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Heart and Vessels (Impact Factor: 2.11). 05/2007; 22(3):184-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-006-0963-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of the present study was to investigate outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). We reviewed baseline/follow-up data of 15 consecutive ARVC patients (mean age 55 +/- 15 years) and 30 randomly drawn patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (mean age 60 +/- 10 years) with matching durations of follow-up (all implanted with ICDs for primary/secondary prevention of sudden death). At implant, appropriate placement of the RV lead was more difficult in ARVC patients. During follow-up (median 41 months), appropriate interventions for any ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 8 (53%) ARVC patients and 17 (57%) CAD patients, but the occurrence of high rate (>240 beats/min) ventricular tachyarrhythmias was higher in ARVC patients. Inappropriate ICD interventions occurred in 5 (33%) ARVC patients and 10 (33%) CAD patients. Lead-related adverse events requiring surgical revision occurred in 7 (47%) ARVC patients as compared with 4 (13%) CAD patients (P = 0.0004). While ICD implantation is highly effective for prevention of sudden death in ARVC, it does carry elevated burdens of long-term lead-related adverse events. These findings underline the need of careful follow-up in ARVC aimed at early recognition of complications that can impair ICD function.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: -Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is a cardiomyopathy characterized by ventricular arrhythmias and an abnormal right ventricle. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy may prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with ARVD/C. Currently, an overview of outcomes, appropriate and inappropriate interventions, and complications of ICD therapy in ARVD/C is lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: -A literature search was performed to identify studies reporting outcome and complications in patients with ARVD/C who underwent ICD implantation. Of 641 articles screened, 24 studies on 18 cohorts were eligible for inclusion. In case of >1 publications on a cohort, the most recent publication was included in the meta-analysis. There were 610 patients (mean age 40.4 years; 42% women), who had an ICD for primary or secondary prevention of SCD. Risk factors for SCD were presyncope (61%), syncope (31%), previous cardiac arrest (14%), ventricular tachycardia (58%), and ventricular fibrillation (6%). Anti-arrhythmic medication consisted mostly of beta-blockers (38%), amiodarone (14%), or sotalol (30%). During the 3.8-year follow-up, annualized cardiac mortality rate was 0.9%, annualized noncardiac mortality rate was 0.8%, and annualized heart transplant rate was 0.9%. The annualized appropriate and inappropriate ICD intervention rates were respectively 9.5% and 3.7%. ICD related complications consisted of difficult lead placement (18.4%), lead malfunction (9.8%), infection (1.4%), lead displacement (3.3%), and any complication (20.3%). CONCLUSIONS: -Cardiac and noncardiac mortality rates following ICD implantation in patients with ARVD/C are low. Appropriate ICD intervention occurred at a rate of 9.5%/year. Inappropriate ICD interventions and complications lead to considerable ICD related morbidity.
    Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 05/2013; 6(3). DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000392 · 5.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiomyopathy is defined as a heterogeneous group of diseases of the myocardium associated with mechanical and/or electrical dysfunction due to a variety of causes that are frequently genetic. These are either confined to the heart or are part of generalised systemic disorders, often leading to cardiovascular death or progressive heart failure related disability. Determination of exact aetiology of cardiomyopathy can be difficult but remains important for both treatment and prognosis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging allows comprehensive assessment of patients suspected to have cardiomyopathy and is therefore being increasingly used in diagnosis and follow-up of these patients. This review presents the main features of common cardiomyopathies on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and highlights its role in providing additional information over and above the traditional diagnostic techniques.
    Postgraduate medical journal 07/2011; 88(1035):38-48. DOI:10.1136/pgmj.2010.099697 · 1.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous almost substituted subpectoral approach of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation as a less invasive surgical technique. However, the impact of this change in placement site on procedure-related shoulder impairment is poorly understood. METHODS: Candidates for ICD implantation were prospectively evaluated at baseline, 2-weeks and 3-months after the procedure. Assessment of shoulder function included: Constant Score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring method. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was adopted for quality of life. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients were enrolled (21 single-chamber, 5 dual-chamber and 24 biventricular ICD). Significant changes in the short term were observed: physical component summary (regarding SF-36) decreased from 44.5±9.1 to 41.8±11.4 (p=0.016), patients with NRS >1 increased from 14% to 44% (p<0.001), DASH score increased from 1.29 [interquartile range 0.00-10.34] to 30.60 [interquartile range 12.93-46.34] (p<0.001). Notably, only the shoulder ipsilateral to implantation site presented a decrease in Constant Score (76.00 [interquartile range 61.37-86.87] vs. 95.75 [interquartile range 91.37-98.00]; p<0.001). After three months most of the parameters seemed to have recovered, except for range of motion. Procedure-related increase in pain (i.e. NRS increase ≥1 point) was the most important independent predictor of shoulder impairment, in terms of Constant Score modification (r=0.570; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICD implantation is frequently associated with ipsilateral shoulder impairment which tends to recover within 3-months. These data positively compare with the subpectoral approach and should be considered for future research regarding impact of ICD implant on physical well-being and quality of life.
    International journal of cardiology 10/2012; 168(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.071 · 6.18 Impact Factor