The Patient Safety in Surgery Study: Background, Study Design, and Patient Populations

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Journal of the American College of Surgeons (Impact Factor: 5.12). 07/2007; 204(6):1089-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.028
Source: PubMed


The purpose of this article is to describe the background, design, and patient populations of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study, as a preliminary to the articles in this journal that will report the results of the Study.
The Patient Safety in Surgery Study was a prospective cohort study. Trained nurses collected preoperative risk factors, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity outcomes in patients undergoing major general and vascular operations at 128 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and 14 selected university medical centers between October 1, 2001 and September 30, 2004. An Internet-based data collection system was used to input data from the different private medical centers. Semiannual feedback of observed to expected mortality and morbidity ratios was provided to the participating medical centers.
During the 3-year study, total accrual in general surgery was 145,618 patients, including 68.5% from the VA and 31.5% from the private sector. Accrual in vascular surgery totaled 39,225 patients, including 77.8% from the VA and 22.2% from the private sector. VA patients were older and included a larger proportion of male patients and African Americans and Hispanics. The VA population included more inguinal, umbilical, and ventral hernia repairs, although the private-sector population included more thyroid and parathyroid, appendectomy, and operations for breast cancer. Preoperative comorbidities were similar in the two populations, but the rates of comorbidities were higher in the VA. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification tended to be higher in the VA.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program methodology was successfully implemented in the 14 university medical centers. The data from the study provided the basis for the articles in this issue of the Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert M Mentzer, Oct 05, 2015
79 Reads
  • Source
    • "Postoperative transfusion involved bleeding that required at least 1 unit of transfusion. All variables were used as defined in the ACS-NSQIP user guide [10]. IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 was used to perform all statistics in this study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and purpose: Tibial shaft fractures are often treated by intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plate fixation. Our purpose was to compare the 30-day complication rates between IMN and plate fixation of extra-articular tibial fractures. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30 day complications of isolated closed extra-articular tibial shaft fractures from 2006 to 2012 using the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. A 1:2 propensity-matched dataset was created to control for differences in preoperative demographics and comorbidities across the plate fixation and IMN groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess differences in complications between the groups and the independent effects of plate fixation or IMN on complications. Results: A total of 771 patients were identified with 234 (30.4%) in the plate fixation and 537 (69.6%) in the IMN group. We found no statistical difference in rates of wound complications, medical complications, reoperation, or mortality in our propensity matched analyses. Plate fixation was found to be independently associated with a lower risk of postoperative blood transfusion compared to IMN (odds ratio 0.326, p=0.032). Plate fixation was not independently associated with any other examined complications. Conclusions: We found no difference in 30-day postoperative complications between plate fixation and intramedullary nailing of isolated extra-articular tibia fractures with the exception of decreased postoperative transfusion requirements with plate fixation. We conclude that both procedures offer a similar short-term complication profile.
    Injury 12/2014; 28(4). DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.014 · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "They also showed that tachycardia > 100 beats/min may increases the likelihood of cardiac events. The American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) tended to find a correlation between hemodynamic changes and perioperative cardiac events in a 30-day follow up [12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The cardiac patient undergoing major urologic surgery is a complex case requiring a great attention by the anesthesiologist. Number of this group of patients having to go through this procedure is constantly increasing, due to prolonged life, increased agressiveness of surgery and increased anesthesia's safety. The anesthesiologist usually has to deal with several problems of the patient, such as hypertension, chronic heart failure, coronary artery disease, rhythm disturbances, intraoperative hemodymanic changes, intraoperative bleeding, perioperative fluid imbalance, and metabolic disturbances. A cardiac patient undergoing major urologic surgery is a complex case requiring a great attention by the anesthesiologist. The scope of this review article is to present the most frequent issues encountered with this group of patients, and to synthetically discuss the respective strategies and maneuvers during perioperative period, which is the major challenge for the anesthesiologist.
    International Archives of Medicine 04/2014; 7(1):17. DOI:10.1186/1755-7682-7-17 · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "there remain significant post-operative morbidity, mortality and occasional need for prolonged hospitalisation [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Structured care pathways optimising peri-operative care have been shown to significantly enhance post-operative recovery. We aim to determine if enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles could provide benefit for paediatric patients undergoing major colorectal resection for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Children undergoing elective bowel resection for IBD at a regional paediatric unit using standard methods of peri-operative care were matched to adult cases from an associated tertiary referral university hospital already using an ERAS program. Cases were matched for disease type, gender, operative procedure, and ASA grade. Forty-four children undergoing fifty procedures were identified. Thirty-four were matched to adult cases. Total length of stay in the paediatric group was significantly longer than in the adult group (6 vs. 9days; P=0.001). Paediatric patients were slower to start solid diet (1 vs. 4days; P<0.0001) and were slower to mobilize post-operatively (1 vs. 4days; P<0.0001). No difference was seen in time to restoration of bowel function (2 vs. 3days; P=0.49). Thirty day readmissions and total in-hospital morbidity were not significantly different between the groups. Potentially, application of ERAS in paediatric surgery could accelerate recovery and reduce length of post-operative stay thereby improving quality and efficiency of care.
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 09/2013; 48(9):1924-30. DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.063 · 1.39 Impact Factor
Show more