Transcriptional responses to fatty acid are coordinated by combinatorial control

Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98103-8904, USA.
Molecular Systems Biology (Impact Factor: 10.87). 02/2007; 3(1):115. DOI: 10.1038/msb4100157
Source: PubMed


In transcriptional regulatory networks, the coincident binding of a combination of factors to regulate a gene implies the existence of complex mechanisms to control both the gene expression profile and specificity of the response. Unraveling this complexity is a major challenge to biologists. Here, a novel network topology-based clustering approach was applied to condition-specific genome-wide chromatin localization and expression data to characterize a dynamic transcriptional regulatory network responsive to the fatty acid oleate. A network of four (predicted) regulators of the response (Oaf1p, Pip2p, Adr1p and Oaf3p) was investigated. By analyzing trends in the network structure, we found that two groups of multi-input motifs form in response to oleate, each controlling distinct functional classes of genes. This functionality is contributed in part by Oaf1p, which is a component of both types of multi-input motifs and has two different regulatory activities depending on its binding context. The dynamic cooperation between Oaf1p and Pip2p appears to temporally synchronize the two different responses. Together, these data suggest a network mechanism involving dynamic combinatorial control for coordinating transcriptional responses.

Download full-text


Available from: Jennifer Joy Smith,
1 Follower
15 Reads
  • Source
    • "Spt23 is involved in the regulation of the single yeast fatty acid desaturase Ole1, while Cst6 and Pip2 are regulators of oleate responsive genes. Interestingly, the action of Spt23 in its target DHA/DAG genes was found to occur under heat shock (Auld et al., 2006), while that of Pip2 upon ARN2, TPO1, and TPO4 was registered in cells growing on oleate as carbon source (Smith et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multidrug/Multixenobiotic resistance (MDR/MXR) is a widespread phenomenon with clinical, agricultural and biotechnological implications, where MDR/MXR transporters that are presumably able to catalyze the efflux of multiple cytotoxic compounds play a key role in the acquisition of resistance. However, although these proteins have been traditionally considered drug exporters, the physiological function of MDR/MXR transporters and the exact mechanism of their involvement in resistance to cytotoxic compounds are still open to debate. In fact, the wide range of structurally and functionally unrelated substrates that these transporters are presumably able to export has puzzled researchers for years. The discussion has now shifted toward the possibility of at least some MDR/MXR transporters exerting their effect as the result of a natural physiological role in the cell, rather than through the direct export of cytotoxic compounds, while the hypothesis that MDR/MXR transporters may have evolved in nature for other purposes than conferring chemoprotection has been gaining momentum in recent years. This review focuses on the drug transporters of the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS; drug:H(+) antiporters) in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. New insights into the natural roles of these transporters are described and discussed, focusing on the knowledge obtained or suggested by post-genomic research. The new information reviewed here provides clues into the unexpectedly complex roles of these transporters, including a proposed indirect regulation of the stress response machinery and control of membrane potential and/or internal pH, with a special emphasis on a genome-wide view of the regulation and evolution of MDR/MXR-MFS transporters.
    Frontiers in Physiology 05/2014; 5:180. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2014.00180 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Elucidating global regulatory modules in lipid metabolism and how they interact in response to environmental conditions has direct implications for human health and biotechnology (Smith et al. 2007; Brehme and Vidal 2010; Gallego et al. 2010). In humans, disorders in lipid metabolism, transport, and trafficking are involved in the etiology of many diseases, such as atherosclerosis, diabetes, and cancer (Henneberry and Sturley 2005; Maxfield and Tabas 2005; Hannun and Obeid 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lipids play a central role in cellular function as constituents of membranes, as signaling molecules, and as storage materials. Although much is known about the role of lipids in regulating specific steps of metabolism, comprehensive studies integrating genome-wide expression data, metabolite levels, and lipid levels are currently lacking. Here, we map condition dependent regulation controlling lipid metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by measuring 5636 mRNAs, 50 metabolites, 97 lipids, and 57 (13)C-reaction fluxes in yeast using a 3-factor full-factorial design. Correlation analysis across 8 environmental conditions revealed 2279 gene expression level-metabolite/lipid relationships that characterize the extent of transcriptional regulation in lipid metabolism relative to major metabolic hubs within the cell. To query this network, we developed integrative methods for correlation of multi-omics datasets that elucidate global regulatory signatures. Our data highlight many characterized regulators of lipid metabolism and reveal that sterols are regulated more at the transcriptional level than amino acids. Beyond providing insights into the systems-level organization of lipid metabolism, we anticipate that our dataset and approach can join an emerging number of studies to be widely used for interrogating cellular systems through the combination of mathematical modeling and experimental biology.
    G3-Genes Genomes Genetics 09/2013; 3(11). DOI:10.1534/g3.113.006601 · 3.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The description of vesicles emanating from mitochondria and providing a vesicular trafficking pathway from mitochondria to peroxisomes (Neuspiel et al., 2008; Braschi et al., 2010) is intriguing, but of unknown physiological significance. The emerging understanding of global regulators of peroxisome biogenesis in simple unicellular organisms will shed light on signaling and regulatory events coordinating peroxisome biogenesis (Smith et al., 2007; Saleem et al., 2008, 2010). The use of proteomic approaches to fully catalog and characterize this compartment and its specialized forms will bridge gaps in our understanding of peroxisomal metabolic pathways, while also uncovering novel functions (Saleem et al., 2006; Managadze et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The biogenesis of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins is substantially different from the biogenesis of proteins of other subcellular compartments, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts, that are of endosymbiotic origin. Proteins are targeted to the peroxisome matrix through interactions between specific targeting sequences and receptor proteins, followed by protein translocation across the peroxisomal membrane. Recent advances have shed light on the nature of the peroxisomal translocon in matrix protein import and the molecular mechanisms of receptor recycling. Furthermore, the endoplasmic reticulum has been shown to play an important role in peroxisomal membrane protein biogenesis. Defining the molecular events in peroxisome assembly may enhance our understanding of the etiology of human peroxisome biogenesis disorders.
    The Journal of Cell Biology 04/2011; 193(1):7-16. DOI:10.1083/jcb.201010022 · 9.83 Impact Factor
Show more