Two further comments on Durkheim's Le Suicide.

Suicide Prevention Project, Flemish Mental Health Centres FDGG-VVI, Gent, Belgium.
Crisis The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention (Impact Factor: 1.09). 02/2007; 28(1):44-5. DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910.28.1.44
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It appears that the publications of Goldney and Schioldann (2000, 2001a,b, 2002) touched a chord, namely, the quality of the basic literature of contemporary suicidology and the usage of certain words and concepts. This paper adds two comments to this discussion. The first comment focuses on the usage of "altruistic," "egoistic," and "anomic" suicide. The second is a comment on the reception of Le Suicide.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The authors have been studying the history of suicide research for years and have discovered that Durkheim's famous book on suicide has served to hide many important forerunners, astute observations, and seminal conceptions from the vast pre-Durkheim literature on the subject. Especially, Tuke and Savage, who anticipated and presented the psychiatric view current today which puts stress on the vulnerability factors of psychiatric illness or disturbances of personality, beside taking into account factors of physical and sociocultural environment. This volume reprints two essays one each by Tuke and Savage, with a short overview of the lives and works of the two eminent psychiatrists, and puts the issue of 19th century's history of suicide research into context in the respective forewords, prefaces, and a good commentary. In the Appendix the reader finds reprints of front pages and tables of contents of other important monographs on suicide. These other books point to the fact that Durkheim is only one of a series of scientific studies on this paradoxical and uniquely human manifestation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    Crisis The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention 24(3):137. · 1.09 Impact Factor