Two Further Comments on Durkheim's Le Suicide

Suicide Prevention Project, Flemish Mental Health Centres FDGG-VVI, Gent, Belgium.
Crisis The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention (Impact Factor: 1.09). 02/2007; 28(1):44-5. DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910.28.1.44
Source: PubMed


It appears that the publications of Goldney and Schioldann (2000, 2001a,b, 2002) touched a chord, namely, the quality of the basic literature of contemporary suicidology and the usage of certain words and concepts. This paper adds two comments to this discussion. The first comment focuses on the usage of "altruistic," "egoistic," and "anomic" suicide. The second is a comment on the reception of Le Suicide.

13 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this, the last issue of the year, I am pleased to review the articles Crisis published in 2007. In this volume, the journal published papers from authors in 22 different countries, reflecting both the international reach of the journal and that of the International Association for Suicide Prevention. The published studies span a wide range of issues, from suicide mortality surveillance data in South Africa to helping those bereaved by suicide in Hong Kong, and draw on various methodologies including epidemiological, longitudinal, time series, econometric, content analytic, and qualitative approaches. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    Crisis The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention 07/2007; 28(4):159-164. DOI:10.1027/0227-5910.28.4.159 · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pesticide self-poisoning is one of the most frequently used methods of suicide worldwide, killing over 300 000 people annually. Around 15-20% of pesticide self-poisonings occur soon after the person has bought the pesticide from a shop. We aim to determine the characteristics of individuals who purchase pesticides directly from shops and how they differ from individuals who access pesticides from other sources such as home, home garden or farmland. This information will help inform possible vendor/shop-based intervention strategies aimed at reducing access to pesticides used for self-harm. This study will investigate risk factors associated with purchasing pesticides for acts of self-poisoning from pesticide shops, including cases identified over a 9-month period using a population-based case-control group approach. Four interviewer-administered data collection tools will be used for this study: a semistructured questionnaire, Beck Suicidal Intent Scale (SIS), Clinical Interview Schedule-Sinhalese version (CIS-Sn) and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Each case (expected n=33) will be compared with two groups of individuals: (1) those who have self-poisoned using pesticides from the home, home garden or farmland and (2) those who bought pesticides from the same shops as the above cases, but not did not self-poison. Logistic regression models will be used to identify risk factors of purchasing pesticides for self-poisoning from shops. The study has received ethical approval from the Ethical Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka. A sensitive data collection technique will be used and ethical issues will be considered throughout the study. Results will be disseminated in scientific peer-reviewed articles. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to
    BMJ Open 05/2015; 5(5):e007822. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007822 · 2.27 Impact Factor