Impact Of Pediatricians’ Perceived Self-Efficacy and Confidence on Violence Prevention Counseling: A National Study

Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS), Department of Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Blvd., Elk Grove Village, IL, 60007, USA.
Maternal and Child Health Journal (Impact Factor: 2.24). 02/2008; 12(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-007-0223-2
Source: PubMed


To measure impact of pediatricians' perceived self-efficacy and confidence on current practices and attitudes regarding four violence prevention (VP) topics (gun storage, gun removal, limiting exposure to media violence, discipline techniques) during health supervision for children ages 2-11.
Random sample survey of American Academy of Pediatrics Fellows (n = 486; 53% response rate) providing health supervision for children ages 2-11. Participants surveyed about VP issues regarding: (1) current counseling practices for 2-5 and 6-11 year olds; (2) amount of time spent addressing; (3) confidence in addressing; and (4) perceived self-efficacy at changing patients' behaviors. Multivariate analyses explored relationships between pediatricians' perceived self-efficacy and confidence versus VP counseling frequency.
VP topics were not routinely discussed during health supervision. Most pediatricians (64%) reported spending too little time addressing these topics. Although most pediatricians felt confident discussing and effective at changing behaviors regarding limiting exposure to media violence (89% vs. 50%) and discipline techniques (91% vs. 76%), they were less so for safe gun storage (54% vs. 35%) and gun removal (51% vs. 17%). Perceived self-efficacy was the mediating factor on self-reported VP counseling frequencies for all topics.
Pediatricians reported spending insufficient time on VP counseling. Confidence and perceived self-efficacy levels varied by VP topic, but for all topics pediatricians felt more confident discussing than effective at changing behaviors. Since pediatricians' self-efficacy was related to counseling practices, boosting self-efficacy could ultimately improve counseling frequencies. Further research is needed to identify methods to build providers' perceived self-efficacy regarding these VP areas.

9 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There have been many false starts for the multichip module (MCM) industry. Complications have arisen due to its function as a sub-assembly and the lack of a viable infrastructure covering the supply of die, substrates, final packaging and associated design and test support. Many of these problems are being addressed as the use of MCMs increase due to the growth in portable technology and the anticipated decline in costs. A number of innovations are also taking place around the world to accelerate the use and building of the MCM infrastructure. In Europe there is EUROPRACTICE, in the USA the MIDAS programme and in Japan the vertically integrated influence. In Taiwan ITRI recently opened a foundry (APack Technologies Inc.) for MCMs and is one of the three licensees of the AT&T MCM technology. This paper looks at a number of issues influencing the introduction of MCM technology, initiatives to accelerate this process and the projected use over the next five to ten years
    Multichip Modules, 1997., 6th International Conference on; 05/1997
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Each year about 4,000 teens ages 16-19 die on U.S. roads. Injury prevention counseling is recommended as a valuable and cost-effective part of routine health supervision. This study describes pediatrician knowledge and practice regarding teen driving safety. A 31-item self-administered survey was mailed to pediatricians. 160 of 392 pediatricians (41%) completed the survey. During a health supervision visit 93% of pediatricians reported discussing seat belt use, 89% impaired driving, 54% teen licensing laws, and 16% parent teen contract. Half reported having a teen in their practice killed in a crash. A majority surveyed report discussing and counseling teens on first wave teen driver safety issues (seat belts, alcohol use), but most do not discuss graduated driver licensing laws or related issues. Impact on Industry: Broadly adopted, this inexpensive counseling approach, could lead to reductions in teen motorvehicle crash injuries.
    Journal of safety research 02/2009; 40(2):121-4. DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2009.02.003 · 1.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As part of a statewide campaign, we surveyed physician attitudes and practice regarding teen driving safety before and after a brief intervention designed to facilitate in office counseling. A 31-item self-administered survey was mailed to Connecticut physicians, and this was followed by a mailing of teen driving safety materials to physician practices in the state. A postintervention survey was mailed 8 months after the presurvey. A total of 102 physicians completed both the pre and postsurveys. Thirty-nine percent (39%) reported having had a teen in their practice die in a motor vehicle crash in the presurvey, compared with 49% in the postsurvey. Physician counseling increased significantly for a number of issues: driving while impaired from 86% to 94%; restrictions on teen driving from 53% to 64%; teen driving laws from 53% to 63%; safe vehicle from 32% to 42%; parents model safe driving from 29% to 44%; and teen-parent written contract from 15% to 37%. At baseline, the majority of physicians who provide care to teenagers in Connecticut report discussing and counseling teens on first wave teen driver safety issues (seat belts, alcohol use), but most do not discuss graduate driver licensing laws or related issues. After a brief intervention, there was a significant increase in physician counseling of teens on teen driving laws and on the use of teen-parent contracts. Additional interventions targeting physician practices can improve physician counseling to teens and their parents on issues of teen driving safety.
    The Journal of trauma 08/2009; 67(1 Suppl):S54-7. DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a93194 · 2.96 Impact Factor
Show more