Effects of pesticides on community structure and ecosystem functions in agricultural streams of three biogeographical regions in Europe. Sci Total Environ

UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Dept. System Ecotoxicology, Permoser Strasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Science of The Total Environment (Impact Factor: 4.1). 10/2007; 382(2-3):272-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.040
Source: PubMed


There is a paucity of large-scale field investigations on the effects of organic toxicants on stream macroinvertebrate community structure and ecosystem functions. We investigated a total of 29 streams in two study areas of France and Finland for pesticide exposure, invertebrates and leaf-litter breakdown. To link pesticide exposure and community composition we applied the trait-based Species At Risk (SPEAR) indicator system. In the French region, pesticide stress was associated with a decrease in the relative abundance and number of sensitive species in the communities. The presence of undisturbed upstream reaches partly compensated the effects of pesticide contamination. Functional effects of pesticides were identified by a 2.5-fold reduction of the leaf-litter breakdown rate that was closely correlated with the structural changes in the contaminated streams. No effects of pesticides were observed in Finnish streams since contamination with pesticides was very low. In a follow-up analysis, the SPEAR approach successfully discriminated between reference and contaminated sites across different biogeographical regions, also including results of a previous field study in North Germany. Furthermore, change of the community structure was detectable at a concentration range as low as 1/100 to 1/1000 the acute 48 h-LC50 of Daphnia magna. Our findings demonstrate that pesticides may influence the structure and function of lotic ecosystems and that the SPEAR approach can be used as a powerful tool in biomonitoring over large spatial scales.

Download full-text


Available from: Matthias Liess, Mar 05, 2014
  • Source
    • ") or %SPEARpm (Schäfer et al., 2007, 2011, 2012). Surprisingly, the SPEARpm metric showed no significant correlation to sumTU (D. magna) in this study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many tropical countries contain a high density of protected ecosystems, and these may often be bordered by intensive agricultural systems. We investigated the chemical and ecological status of a stream connecting an area with conventional rice production and a downstream protected nature reserve; Mata Redonda. Three sites were sampled: 1) an upstream control, 2) in the rice production area and 3) a downstream site in Mata Redonda. We sampled benthic macroinvertebrates and pesticides in water and sediments along with supporting physical and chemical data. Pesticide concentrations in water exceeded current safety thresholds at sites 2 and 3, especially during the rainy season, and sediment associated pesticide concentrations exceeded current safety thresholds in three of six samples. Importantly, the highest predicted pesticide toxicity in sediments was observed at site 3 in the Mata Redonda confirming that the nature reserve received critical levels of pesticide pollution from upstream sections. The currently used macroinvertebrate index in Costa Rica (BMWP-CR) and an adjusted version of the SPecies At Risk index (SPEAR) were not significantly correlated to any measure of anthropogenic stress, but the Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT) index was significantly correlated with the predicted pesticide toxicity (sumTUD.magna), oxygen concentrations and substrate composition. Our results suggest that pesticide pollution was likely involved in the impairment of the ecological status of the sampling sites, including site 3 in Mata Redonda. Based on our results, we give guidance to biomonitoring in Costa Rica and call for increased focus on pesticide transport from agricultural regions to protected areas.
    Science of The Total Environment 10/2015; 542(Pt A):12-21. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.062 · 4.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Climate change and pollution act on different spatial scales; climate change is related to large spatial scales and pollution is often a local or a regional phenomenon, though diffuse inputs may result in an ubiquitous presence of some chemicals (MacLeod et al., 2014). The alteration of ecosystems structure and functioning by these multi-stressors has promoted the search for diagnostic and predictive tools that can also be applied over large spatial scales (Lamouroux et al., 2002; Sch€ afer et al., 2007; Newbold et al., 2012; Díaz et al., 2013). Here, climate change and pollution are termed as ῾multi-stressors᾿ due to their association with multiple individual stressors such as changes in precipitation and temperature in the case of climate change. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Climate change and pollution are considered as major drivers of biodiversity loss. Climate change is a global multi-stressor, whereas pollution predominantly acts on the local scale. Organisms traits provide mechanistic links between biotic responses and stressors. We reviewed and analyzed the literature on the responses of vertebrates, invertebrates, microorganisms and plants traits to climate change (437 studies) and pollution (121 studies), to assess whether there was uniformity (i.e. convergence) in the responses of traits to the multi-stressors. For climate change, the traits related to tolerance responded uniformly across taxonomic groups, indicating trait convergence. For pollution, the low number of studies hampered a comparison across taxonomic groups. However, aquatic invertebrates that are tolerant, or exhibit high dispersal or reproduction capacities increased in response to pollution, whereas body mass and size increased in phytoplankton and fish, respectively. We provide a set of traits that have the potential to predict ecosystem-wide effects of climate change and pollution.
  • Source
    • "Dijksterhuis et al. 2011; Maltby et al. 2009). Accordingly, Schäfer et al. (2007; 2011) and Rasmussen et al. (2012b) detected an up to 4-fold reduction in microbial OMD in agriculturally-impacted streams compared to reference sites. Pesticide toxicity towards microorganisms was identified as the most influential predictor of OMD. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biofilms play a fundamental ecological role in freshwater ecosystems as they contribute to ecosystem function(s) such as autotrophic primary production, organic matter decomposition and the bottom-up directed energy transfer in the food web. The present focused review summarizes the scientific knowledge on how the roles of autotrophic and heterotrophic biofilms can be modulated as a response to chemical (i.e., pesticide) stress. We discuss how horizontal effects (alterations in the structure of biofilms) can affect the physiological fitness and life history strategy of the next trophic level (vertical effects), namely primary consumers. Since the literature indicates that heterotrophic biofilms are currently at risk as a result of pesticide stress, the protectiveness of environmental risk assessment in Europe as well as North America is questioned. By briefly outlining substantial knowledge gaps, we provide ideas on how the identified uncertainties may be empirically addressed.
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 09/2015; 95(4). DOI:10.1007/s00128-015-1642-1 · 1.26 Impact Factor
Show more