Liking vs. wanting food: importance for human appetite control and weight regulation.

Biopsychology Group, Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Impact Factor: 10.28). 02/2007; 31(7):987-1002. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.03.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Current train of thought in appetite research is favouring an interest in non-homeostatic or hedonic (reward) mechanisms in relation to overconsumption and energy balance. This tendency is supported by advances in neurobiology that precede the emergence of a new conceptual approach to reward where affect and motivation (liking and wanting) can be seen as the major force in guiding human eating behaviour. In this review, current progress in applying processes of liking and wanting to the study of human appetite are examined by discussing the following issues: How can these concepts be operationalised for use in human research to reflect the neural mechanisms by which they may be influenced? Do liking and wanting operate independently to produce functionally significant changes in behaviour? Can liking and wanting be truly experimentally separated or will an expression of one inevitably contain elements of the other? The review contains a re-examination of selected human appetite research before exploring more recent methodological approaches to the study of liking and wanting in appetite control. In addition, some theoretical developments are described in four diverse models that may enhance current understanding of the role of these processes in guiding ingestive behaviour. Finally, the implications of a dual process modulation of food reward for weight gain and obesity are discussed. The review concludes that processes of liking and wanting are likely to have independent roles in characterising susceptibility to weight gain. Further research into the dissociation of liking and wanting through implicit and explicit levels of processing would help to disclose the relative importance of these components of reward for appetite control and weight regulation.


Available from: Graham Finlayson, May 28, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food reinforcement is related to increased energy intake, cross-sectionally related to obesity and prospectively related to weight gain in children, adolescents and adults. There is very limited research on how different characteristics of food are related to food reinforcement, and none on how foods from different taste categories (sweet, savory, salty) are related to food reinforcement. We tested differences in food reinforcement for favorite foods in these categories and used a reinforcing value questionnaire to assess how food reinforcement was related to energy intake in 198 non-overweight 8-12 year-old children. Results showed stronger food reinforcement for sweet foods in comparison to savory or salty foods. In multiple regression models, controlling for child sex, minority status and age, average reinforcing value was related to total energy and fat intake, and reinforcing value of savory foods was related to total energy and fat intake. Factor analysis showed one factor, the motivation to eat, rather than separate factors based on different taste categories. Liking ratings were unrelated to total energy intake. These results suggest that while there are differences in the reinforcing value of food by taste groups, there are not strong differences in the relationship between reinforcing value of food by taste groups and energy or macronutrient intake. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Appetite 04/2015; 91. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.050 · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • 12/2015; 4(1). DOI:10.1186/s13411-014-0029-2
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Green-plant membranes, thylakoids, have previously been found to increase postprandial release of the satiety hormone GLP-1, implicated in reward signaling. The purpose of this study was to investigate how treatment with a single dose of thylakoids before breakfast affects homeostatic as well as hedonic hunger, measured as wanting and liking for palatable food (VAS). We also examined whether treatment effects were correlated to scores for eating behavior. Compared to placebo, intake of thylakoids significantly reduced hunger (21% reduction, p<0.05), increased satiety (14% increase, p<0.01), reduced cravings for all snacks and sweets during the day (36% reduction, p<0.05), as well as cravings for salty (30%, p<0.01); sweet (38%, p<0.001); and sweet-and-fat (36%, p<0.05) snacks, respectively, and decreased subjective liking for sweet (28% reduction, p<0.01). The treatment effects on wanting all snacks, sweet-and-fat snacks in particular, were positively correlated to higher emotional eating scores (p<0.01). The treatment effect of thylakoids on scores for wanting and liking were correlated to a reduced intake by treatment (p<0.01 respectively), even though food intake was not affected significantly. In conclusion, thylakoids may be used as a food supplement to reduce hedonic hunger, associated with overeating and obesity. Individuals scoring higher for emotional eating behavior may have enhanced treatment effect on cravings for palatable food. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Appetite 04/2015; 401. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.051 · 2.52 Impact Factor