An Evidence-Based Perspective on Greetings in Medical Encounters

Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 17.33). 07/2007; 167(11):1172-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.11.1172
Source: PubMed


Widely used models for teaching and assessing communication skills highlight the importance of greeting patients appropriately, but there is little evidence regarding what constitutes an appropriate greeting.
To obtain data on patient expectations for greetings, we asked closed-ended questions about preferences for shaking hands, use of patient names, and use of physician names in a computer-assisted telephone survey of adults in the 48 contiguous United States. We also analyzed an existing sample of 123 videotaped new patient visits to characterize patterns of greeting behavior in everyday clinical practice.
Most (78.1%) of the 415 survey respondents reported that they want the physician to shake their hand, 50.4% want their first name to be used when physicians greet them, and 56.4% want physicians to introduce themselves using their first and last names; these expectations vary somewhat with patient sex, age, and race. Videotapes revealed that physicians and patients shook hands in 82.9% of visits. In 50.4% of the initial encounters, physicians did not mention the patient's name at all. Physicians tended to use their first and last names when introducing themselves.
Physicians should be encouraged to shake hands with patients but remain sensitive to nonverbal cues that might indicate whether patients are open to this behavior. Given the diversity of opinion regarding the use of names, coupled with national patient safety recommendations concerning patient identification, we suggest that physicians initially use patients' first and last names and introduce themselves using their own first and last names.

131 Reads
  • Source
    • "People use greetings to acknowledge and quickly negotiate 'who is who to whom'. In healthcare, patient-provider greetings mark the start of the visit (Robinson 1998), and are critical in establishing rapport and making patients and their family members feel comfortable (Amer and Fisher 2009; Makoul et al. 2007). Following the greetings, the provider ordinarily initiates the problem presentation (Robinson 2006, Heritage and Maynard 2006a, b) by asking a question, often accompanied by eye gaze and body orientation, that selects the next speaker who could be the child (O:kay:. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conversation and discourse analyses were used to examine medical problem presentation in pediatric care. Healthcare visits involving children with ASD and typically developing children were analyzed. We examined how children’s communicative and epistemic capabilities, and their opportunities to be socialized into a competent patient role are interactionally achieved. We found that medical problem presentation is designed to contain a ‘pre-visit’ account of the interactional and epistemic work that children and caregivers carry out at home to identify the child’s health problems; and that the intersubjective accessibility of children’s experiences that becomes disrupted by ASD presents a dilemma to all participants in the visit. The article examines interactional roots of unmet healthcare needs and foregone medical care of people with ASD.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 10/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10803-015-2550-2 · 3.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "[8] "

    Médecine des Maladies Métaboliques 03/2007; 1(1). DOI:10.1016/S1957-2557(07)88663-9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinicians can easily miss the importance of how what is not present gives depth, perspective, and clues to the real meaning of social action in clinical encounters. This essay addresses examples of commonly overlooked forms of this concept of negative space in the clinician-patient relationship. The examples are negative physical space, which denotes the physical distances that separate clinicians and patients during face-to-face encounters; negative communicative space, which refers to how nonverbal and verbal communication can signify information not exchanged during these visits; and negative longitudinal space, which describes pauses over time and includes what is not said between clinicians and patients between visits. Discussed is how the awareness of these different spaces helps us to let go of our preconceptions, to experience what is there rather than what we expect to find, and to use space sensitively to improve interactions with patients.
    The Annals of Family Medicine 01/2009; 7(1):80-3. DOI:10.1370/afm.914 · 5.43 Impact Factor
Show more


131 Reads
Available from