Bandera EV, Kushi LH, Moore DF, Gifkins DM, McCullough MLFruits and vegetables and endometrial cancer risk: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Nutr Cancer 58: 6-21

The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Nutrition and Cancer (Impact Factor: 2.32). 02/2007; 58(1):6-21. DOI: 10.1080/01635580701307929
Source: PubMed


Endometrial cancer is the most common female gynecological cancer in the United States. Although obesity is a well-established risk factor, the role of other dietary factors is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to summarize and quantify the current evidence for fruit and vegetable intake and endometrial cancer by conducting a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Searches were conducted to identify relevant papers published up to June 2006 in various databases. We included peer-reviewed manuscripts published in any language. Random and fixed-effects pooled risk estimates were estimated. We found one cohort study and 16 case-control studies evaluating various aspects of consumption. The random-effects summary estimates (95% CI) comparing high vs. low categories of intake reported were 0.71 (0.55-0.91) for total vegetables based on 10 studies, 0.85 (0.74-0.97) for cruciferous vegetables based on seven studies, and 0.90 (0.72-1.12) for total fruit based on 14 studies. For 100 g/day intake, summary ORs were 0.90 (0.86-0.95) for total vegetables, 0.79 (0.69-0.90) for cruciferous vegetables, and 0.97 (0.92-1.02) for total fruit. Excluding studies not meeting certain quality criteria provided similar results. The current evidence, based solely on case-control studies, with less than half being population-based, suggests a modest inverse association with vegetable consumption, particularly for cruciferous vegetables. We did not find any cohort studies evaluating fruit and vegetables separately. No firm conclusion can be drawn at this time in the absence of additional well-conducted population-based studies and, particularly, prospective data.

Download full-text


Available from: Marjorie L Mccullough, May 12, 2014
  • Source
    • "These polyphenolic compounds possess known properties which include free radical scavenging, inhibition of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes, as well as anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory actions, anti-bacterial, and antiviral activities to some extent (Frankel, 1995; Pinmai et al., 2008). Subsequently, the intake of herbal remedies and some common dietary supplements rich in antioxidants and micronutrients has been associated with reduced risks of cancer, diabetes and other degenerative disorders associated with inflammation and ageing (Bandera et al., 2007; Liu et al, 2008; de Mesquita et al., 2009; Parsons et al., 2008). Despite the many concerns regarding the degree of bioavailability and biotransformation of these phytochemicals in in vivo experimental settings, as compared to the in vitro situations, this wide group of natural molecules nonetheless represents a promising class as anticancer drugs, due to their multiple targets in cancer cells and their limited toxic effect on normal cells (Manach et al., 2005). "

    Phytochemicals as Nutraceuticals - Global Approaches to Their Role in Nutrition and Health, 12/2011; , ISBN: 978-953-51-0203-8
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Because dietary fat has been postulated to affect obesity and estrogen levels, two important risk factors for endometrial cancer, its association with this disease has received some attention. We summarize here the current evidence for several dietary lipids. Searches were conducted to identify peer-reviewed manuscripts up to December 2006. Two cohort studies and nine case-control studies were included in meta-analyses. Random-effects summary estimates for case-control studies were 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.41) per 10% kcal from total fat and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.47) per 10 g/1,000 kcal of saturated fat. The only cohort study evaluating total fat and saturated fat did not find an association. We estimated a 35% increased risk (95% CI: 0.96, 1.90) per 150 mg/1,000 kcal of cholesterol intake, based on six case-control studies. For animal fat (per 10 g/1,000 kcal) the summary estimates were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.96) and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.69) for two cohort and four case-control studies, respectively. Case-control data suggest an increased risk for total, saturated, and animal fat. However, the limited available cohort data do not support these associations. Additional data, particularly from prospective studies, are needed before conclusions can be drawn.
    Cancer Causes and Control 10/2007; 18(7):687-703. DOI:10.1007/s10552-007-9021-9 · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Case-control studies support a lower risk of endometrial cancer associated with greater vegetable consumption but not fruit consumption. One prospective study suggested an inverse association with fruits and vegetables combined. The authors examined associations for vegetables and fruits separately among women in the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. After exclusions, 41,400 postmenopausal women completed a questionnaire on diet, lifestyle, and medical history at baseline in 1992-1993. Information on diet was updated in 1999; historical dietary information from 1982 was also available. The authors identified 435 eligible cases of endometrial cancer through 2003. In multivariate models, neither fruit consumption (top quintile vs. bottom: rate ratio (RR) = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90, 1.70; p-trend = 0.30) nor vegetable consumption (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.65; p-trend = 0.24) at baseline was associated with risk. Results were similar when diet was cumulatively updated. Only among women who had never used hormone replacement therapy was the risk of endometrial cancer lower in the highest (vs. lowest) tertile of fruit (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.07; p-interaction = 0.03, p-trend = 0.11) or vegetable (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.13; p-interaction = 0.01, p-trend = 0.29) consumption. This prospective study does not support an association between vegetable or fruit consumption and endometrial cancer.
    American Journal of Epidemiology 11/2007; 166(8):902-11. DOI:10.1093/aje/kwm156 · 5.23 Impact Factor
Show more