Association of the Dopamine D4 Receptor (DRD4) Gene and Approach-Related Personality Traits: Meta-Analysis and New Data

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Biological psychiatry (Impact Factor: 10.26). 02/2008; 63(2):197-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.04.006
Source: PubMed


Two variants in the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene have been reported to be associated with human approach-related traits such as novelty seeking and extraversion. However, the strength of evidence for this association remains uncertain.
We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies of the association between the DRD4 gene variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) and C-521T polymorphisms and human approach-related personality traits, including novelty seeking, extraversion, and impulsivity, restricted to adult samples recruited from nonpsychiatric populations, and extended on this literature by attempting to confirm any evidence of association in a replication sample (n = 309) selected for extreme scores on the extraversion subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire from a large (n = 40,090) population-based sample.
Our initial meta-analysis supported the association of the DRD4 C-521T polymorphism, but not the VNTR polymorphism, with approach-related traits. This conclusion was qualified by evidence of significant publication bias and the failure to detect association in a replication sample comprising individuals at the extremes of the trait distribution. The association of the C-521T polymorphism observed in our initial meta-analysis was robust to the inclusion of these new data, but our revised meta-analysis indicated that the association was present for measures of novelty seeking and impulsivity but not for measures of extraversion.
The DRD4 gene may be associated with measures of novelty seeking and impulsivity but not extraversion. The association of the C-521T variant with these measures, if genuine, may account for up to 3% of phenotypic variance.

Download full-text


Available from: Binnaz Yalcin, Jun 02, 2014
  • Source
    • "Significantly higher levels of dopamine have been associated with ES behavior in humans as well as rodents, in particular when expecting an upcoming reward (see for a review Norbury and Husain, 2015). Additional support for these observations comes from a meta-analysis that reported evidence for an association between novelty seeking and the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene [Munafo et al., 2008]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Autistic traits are characterized by social and communication problems, restricted, repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities. The relation between autistic traits and personality characteristics is largely unknown. This study focused on the relation between five specific autistic traits measured with the abridged version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient ("social problems," "preference for routine," "attentional switching difficulties," "imagination impairments," "fascination for numbers and patterns") and Experience Seeking (ES) in a general population sample of adults, and subsequently investigated the genetic and environmental etiology between these traits. Self-reported data on autistic traits and ES were collected in a population sample (n = 559) of unrelated individuals, and in a population based family sample of twins and siblings (n = 560). Phenotypic, genetic and environmental associations between traits were examined in a bivariate model, accounting for sex and age differences. Phenotypically, ES correlated significantly with "preference for routine" and "imagination impairments" in both samples but was unrelated to the other autistic traits. Genetic analyses in the family sample revealed that the association between ES and "preference for routine" and "imagination impairments" could largely be explained by a shared genetic factor (89% and 70%, respectively). Our analyses demonstrated at a phenotypic and genetic level an inverse relationship between ES and specific autistic traits in adults. ES is associated with risk taking behavior such as substance abuse, antisocial behavior and financial problems. Future research could investigate whether autistic traits, in particular strong routine preference and impaired imagination skills, serve as protective factors for such risky behaviors. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics 08/2015; DOI:10.1002/ajmg.b.32352 · 3.42 Impact Factor
    • "animals from various taxa such as human (Munafo et al. 2008), apes (Shimada et al. 2004), mice (Dulawa et al. 1999), dogs (Ito et al. 2004), birds (Fidler et al. 2007), and fish (Boehmler et al. 2007). Thus, Drd4 may be one of the candidate genes that differentiated the behavior of the two pufferfishes in this study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Correlated suits of behaviors (behavioral syndrome) are commonly observed in both inter- and intraspecific studies. In order to understand the genetic basis of such a correlation between species, we compared ten behaviors classified into five categories (acclimation, feeding, normal swimming, reaction to a novel object and activity in a novel environment) between two pufferfish species, Takifugu rubripes and T. niphobles. The two species showed consistent differences in nine behaviors with a significant correlation among behaviors. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis using second generation hybrids revealed that different sets of small effect QTL are associated with the observed interspecific behavioral disparity. This indicates that correlations in temperament traits between them are governed by many genes with small effects, and each behavior has been selected to form particular combination patterns. One of the QTL showing small pleiotropic effect includes the Drd4 gene known for its association with behavioral traits in some animal taxa including mammals.
    Behavior Genetics 06/2015; 45(5). DOI:10.1007/s10519-015-9728-4 · 3.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The DRD4 long allele has been positively selected , which suggests that it likely confers some type of adaptive advan - tage ( Ding et al . , 2002 ; Oak et al . , 2000 ) . Although the long allele has been associated with attentional disorders in prior work ( Gizer & Waldman , 2012 ; Bidwell et al . , 2011 ; Gizer et al . , 2009 ; Munafò et al . , 2008 ; Laucht et al . , 2005 , 2007 ; Langley et al . , 2004 ; Hutchison et al . , 2003 ; Kustanovich et al . , 2003 ; Manor et al . , 2001 ; Swanson U n c o r r e c t e d"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Humans with seven or more repeats in exon III of the DRD4 gene (long DRD4 carriers) sometimes demonstrate impaired attention, as seen in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and at other times demonstrate heightened attention, as seen in addictive behavior. Although the clinical effects of DRD4 are the focus of much work, this gene may not necessarily serve as a "risk" gene for attentional deficits, but as a plasticity gene where attention is heightened for priority items in the environment and impaired for minor items. Here we examine the role of DRD4 in two tasks that benefit from selective attention to high-priority information. We examine a category learning task where performance is supported by focusing on features and updating verbal rules. Here, selective attention to the most salient features is associated with good performance. In addition, we examine the Operation Span (OSPAN) task, a working memory capacity task that relies on selective attention to update and maintain items in memory while also performing a secondary task. Long DRD4 carriers show superior performance relative to short DRD4 homozygotes (six or less tandem repeats) in both the category learning and OSPAN tasks. These results suggest that DRD4 may serve as a "plasticity" gene where individuals with the long allele show heightened selective attention to high-priority items in the environment, which can be beneficial in the appropriate context.
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 09/2014; 27(3):1-13. DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00724 · 4.09 Impact Factor
Show more