Objective cervical portio length measurements: Consistency and efficacy of screening for a short cervix

San Diego Perinatal Center and Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women, San Diego, California, USA.
The Journal of reproductive medicine (Impact Factor: 0.7). 06/2007; 52(5):385-9.
Source: PubMed


To determine the consistency of 4-quadrant cervical portio length measurements with an objective cervical measuring device and to identify patients who may benefit from transvaginal ultrasound.
Prenatal patients (12-34 weeks) derwent 4-quadrant cervical portio measurements and transvaginal ultrasound by different, blinded examiners. Cervical portio quadrant measures were analyzed by correlation analysis, and the predictive ability of cervical portio length measurements to identify short cervices with transvaginal ultrasound was assessed.
The right and left lateral cervical portio measurements were consistently available and correlated highly with each other. Cervical portio length had excellent sensitivity (88%), specificity (92%) and negative predictive value (99%) in identifying patients with a short cervix (< 30 mm) by transvaginal ultrasound.
Right and left lateral cervical portio length measurements are highly consistent and provide an effective screen for patients with short cervixes who may benefit from transvaginal ultrasound.

15 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cervical length (CL) examinations may identify patients in preterm labor or those who may benefit from prophylactic therapy. We sought to compare the accuracy of clinician digital CL examinations with objective measurements using the Cervilenz device in women presenting with symptoms of preterm labor. Forty-two patients with singleton gestation from 24 to 34 weeks' gestation and cervical dilation less than 3 cm underwent speculum examination and Cervilenz measurement. A second examiner, blinded to results, digitally measured CL. Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student t tests and McNemar's tests were used to compare digital and Cervilenz measures. Digital CL was significantly less than Cervilenz (2.88 vs 3.40 cm; P < .001), and in 36% of subjects, this difference exceeded 1 cm. The discrepancy in CL estimates persisted whether women were multiparous or had soft cervices or a history of preterm delivery. Digital assessment underestimates CL, whereas the Cervilenz device permits a visualized and objective CL measure in patients with preterm labor.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 02/2009; 200(5):e37-9. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.026 · 4.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether cervical length (CL) measured by the Cervilenz™ measuring device is an effective screening tool for the prediction of preterm delivery (PTD) compared to fetal fibronectin (fFN). We evaluated fFN and CL among women who enrolled into a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing management algorithms for threatened preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. In all subjects, fFN was collected, with CL determined in blinded fashion. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (NPV) for fFN or Cervilenz in prediction of PTD within 7 days or prior to 37 weeks were determined. Fifty-two subjects were evaluated. CL <30 mm correlated with PTD <7 days (r = 0.31, p = 0.04) and fFN positivity (r = 0.43, p = 0.006). CL <30 mm and fFN had excellent NPV for PTD <7 days (97.1 vs. 97.3%), and the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves were similar for prediction of PTD <7 days (76.6 vs. 75.2%, p = 0.71) or <37 weeks (56.7 vs. 55.2%, p = 0.71). Measurement of CL with Cervilenz appears to be equivalent to fFN in screening symptomatic women for PTD within 7 days or prior to 37 weeks. Given cost and turnaround time with fFN testing, Cervilenz represents a promising new tool for real time, clinically useful results in the management of women with threatened preterm labor.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 11/2010; 24(1):127-31. DOI:10.3109/14767058.2010.529201 · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Premature effacement of the cervix, or short cervix, in the midtrimester of pregnancy currently represents the strongest predictor of spontaneous preterm birth. Numerous studies have examined the relationship between short cervix and preterm birth, and although differences in sensitivity and predictive value exist, the overwhelming consensus indicates that the risk of preterm birth increases with decreasing cervical length. Cutoff values for cervical length range from less than 25 mm to less than 15 mm depending on patient characteristics and gestational age. Importantly, short cervix is more sensitive for predicting earlier forms of prematurity (at <32 weeks) than later forms of prematurity (>32 weeks). Cervical length measured at 18 to 24 weeks' gestation appears to be the most valuable measurement. Cervical length assessments can be performed by digital examination, a cervical measurement device, transabdominal ultrasound, or transvaginal ultrasound. Transvaginal ultrasound is the most reliable method to evaluate cervical length, but it is not available in all locations. Current clinical practice standards do not recommend universal screening for cervical length; however, results of randomized controlled clinical trials provide evidence to support expanded screening programs by individual practitioners.
    Journal of midwifery & women's health 07/2012; 57 Suppl 1(s1):S4-11. DOI:10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00209.x · 1.07 Impact Factor
Show more