Parents grieving the loss of their child: interdependence in coping.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
British Journal of Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 1.9). 04/2008; 47(Pt 1):31-42. DOI: 10.1348/014466507X216152
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A longitudinal study was conducted among bereaved parents, to examine the relationship between parents' own and their partners' ways of coping in terms of the constructs loss-orientation and restoration-orientation (coping strategies based on the bereavement-specific Dual Process Model (Stroebe & Schut, 1999)), and psychological adjustment following the death of their child.
219 couples participated at 6, 13 and 20 months post-loss. Use of the Actor Partner Interdependence Model within multi-level regression analyses enabled assessment of both actor as well as partner effects, and permitted differentiating these effects according to the gender of the parent.
Loss-orientation was predictive of negative psychological adjustment, while restoration-orientation was related to better adjustment. Furthermore, high levels of restoration-oriented coping buffered the negative effect of high levels of loss-orientation on depression. In the interpersonal context, results indicated that for men, having a female partner high in restoration-oriented coping was related to positive adjustment.
In coping with the loss of their child, intra-personal as well as interpersonal processes are relevant for the adjustment process of parents after the loss of their child.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article explores the grief process of parents following the death of a child due to a life-limiting illness, putting particular focus on dyadic coping. Participants included 46 married parents (23 couples). A mixed methods design was used with in-depth interviews and standardized questionnaires. All parents were interviewed separately. Aspects of common dyadic coping (e.g., sharing emotions, or maintaining bonds to the child) helped them work through their grief as a couple but also individually. We conclude that dyadic coping plays an important role in grief work and adjustment to bereavement.
    Death Studies 09/2014; 39(3). DOI:10.1080/07481187.2014.920434 · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Parents bereaved by infant death experience a wide range of symptomatology, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that may persist for years after the loss. Little research has been conducted on PTSD in fathers who have lost an infant. Mothers report most symptoms to a greater extent than fathers, but not much is known about other sex differences following infant death. Method The present cross-sectional study examined sex differences in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and sex differences in the relationship between PTSD severity and related variables. Subjects were 361 mothers and 273 fathers who had lost an infant either late in pregnancy, during birth, or in the first year of life. Participants filled out questionnaires between 1.2 months and 18 years after the loss (M=3.4 years). Results Mothers reported significantly more PTSD symptoms, attachment anxiety, emotion-focused coping, and feeling let down, but significantly lower levels of attachment avoidance than fathers. Attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and emotion-focused coping were significantly more strongly associated with PTSD severity in mothers than fathers, but only when examined alone. When all variables and time since the loss were examined together, there were no longer any significant moderation effects of sex. Conclusions Persistent posttraumatic symptomatology exists in both mothers and fathers long after the loss. There are several sex differences in severity and correlates of PTSD and a few moderation effects were identified for attachment and emotion-focused coping. Overall, more similarities than differences were found between mothers and fathers in the associations between PTSD and covariates.
    General Hospital Psychiatry 08/2014; 36(6). DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.07.012 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: This study aimed to (1) compare women and men regarding absolute and relative coping following a termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality and (2) assess the influence of relative coping on each partner’s adaptive and maladaptive grief responses. Background: Although differences in coping have been cited to explain gender differences on grief symptomatology after a spontaneous pregnancy loss, no study yet has compared women and men regarding use of coping strategies after termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality. Furthermore, considering the relatively high prevalence of clinically relevant grief symptomatology among women following this event, the coping strategies of both women and their partners should be explored as predictors. Methods: 41 couples completed the Perinatal Grief Scale and the Brief COPE, 1–6 months after termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality. Results: Women used Religion more frequently than men. Women’s absolute and relative scores on Emotional Support, Instrumental Support and Venting were higher than men’s. Men presented higher scores on relative use of Acceptance, Humour and Denial. Acceptance positively predicted adaptive grief responses. Self-Blame, Denial, Active Coping and Instrumental Support were positive predictors of maladaptive grief responses. Humour was negatively associated with both types of grief responses. Partner effects were found for Self-Blame and Active Coping. Conclusion: As gender differences regarding coping are normative, psychoeducation may be used to foster intracouple acceptance. Due to their interdependence, both partners should be assessed. Coping strategies like self-blame, associated with maladaptive responses, should be prevented while fostering the use of helpful strategies involving acceptance.
    Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 07/2013; 31(3). DOI:10.1080/02646838.2013.806789 · 0.67 Impact Factor


Available from
May 17, 2014