Respiratory properties of blood in flatback turtles (Natator depressus)
ABSTRACT Oxygen equilibrium curves and other respiratory-related variables were determined on blood from the flatback turtle (Natator depressus) and, for comparison, on some samples from the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta). The oxygen carrying capacity of the flatback turtle, 4.9-8.7 mmol l(-1) (n = 49), is at the high end of the range in diving reptiles. Oxygen affinity (P(50)) was similar in both species at 5% CO(2), ranging from 37 to 55 mmHg (43 mmHg +/- 5.3 SD, n = 24, 25 degrees C, pH 7.17) in flatbacks and 43-49 mmHg in loggerheads (46 mmHg +/- 2.0 SD, n = 7, 25 degrees C, pH 7.13), whereas at 2% CO(2), flatbacks had a higher oxygen affinity. The curves differed in sigmoidicity, with Hill n coefficients of 2.8 and 1.9 in flatbacks and loggerheads, respectively. The Bohr effect was small in both the species, consistent with results from other sea turtles. Lactate levels were high, perhaps because the samples were taken from turtles coming ashore to lay eggs. Flatbacks are rarely found in waters deeper than 45 m. It is suggested that they have a respiratory physiology particularly suited to sustain prolonged shallow dives.
- SourceAvailable from: Jeanette Wyneken[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The flatback turtle is the only species of marine turtle that lacks an oceanic phase of development in its early life history. Instead, the turtles grow to maturity in shallow turbid shelf waters of tropical to subtropical Australia. We studied the development of diving behavior in neonate flatbacks to determine whether diving under those ecological conditions resulted in differences from leatherbacks (Dermochelys coriacea) and green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at the same age when diving in clear, deep oceanic waters. Data were obtained from flatbacks that varied in both age (1–7 weeks) and mass (38–100 g). Each turtle towed a miniature time–depth tag during a single 30-minute trial in shallow (≤ 12 m) turbid shelf waters near Townsville, Queensland, Australia. In total, 192 dives were recorded from 22 turtles from 4 nests. Most dives were short (< 100 seconds) and shallow (< 4 m), but even young turtles could dive to the bottom. The most common flatback dives had V- or W-profiles, whereas, in leatherbacks, most dives were V-profiles, and, in green turtles, the dives were either V- or U-profiles. Routine flatback dives were accomplished by swimming slowly (like leatherbacks), but, when sufficiently motivated, flatbacks could swim faster (> 1 m/s) than green turtles. They could also make repeated deep dives after surfacing only briefly to replenish their oxygen supply. Changes in performance (longer, shallower dives) were correlated with increases in mass but not age. We hypothesize that, as neonates, flatback dives enable the turtles to 1) search efficiently for prey throughout the water column under conditions of limited visibility, 2) minimize surface time so that even in murky water the turtles can return to previously attractive locations, and 3) swim rapidly to evade their predators.Chelonian Conservation and Biology 06/2010; DOI:10.2744/CCB-0803.1 · 0.70 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Ingestion of marine debris can have lethal and sublethal effects on sea turtles and other wildlife. Although researchers have reported on ingestion of anthropogenic debris by marine turtles and implied incidences of debris ingestion have increased over time, there has not been a global synthesis of the phenomenon since 1985. Thus, we analyzed 37 studies published from 1985 to 2012 that report on data collected from before 1900 through 2011. Specifically, we investigated whether ingestion prevalence has changed over time, what types of debris are most commonly ingested, the geographic distribution of debris ingestion by marine turtles relative to global debris distribution, and which species and life-history stages are most likely to ingest debris. The probability of green (Chelonia mydas) and leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) ingesting debris increased significantly over time, and plastic was the most commonly ingested debris. Turtles in nearly all regions studied ingest debris, but the probability of ingestion was not related to modeled debris densities. Furthermore, smaller, oceanic-stage turtles were more likely to ingest debris than coastal foragers, whereas carnivorous species were less likely to ingest debris than herbivores or gelatinovores. Our results indicate oceanic leatherback turtles and green turtles are at the greatest risk of both lethal and sublethal effects from ingested marine debris. To reduce this risk, anthropogenic debris must be managed at a global level. Análisis Global de la Ingesta de Residuos Antropogénicos por Tortugas Marinas La ingesta de residuos marinos puede tener efectos letales y subletales sobre las tortugas marinas y otros animales. Aunque hay investigadores que han reportado la ingesta de residuos antropogénicos por tortugas marinas y la incidencia de la ingesta de residuos ha incrementado con el tiempo, no ha habido una síntesis global del fenómeno desde 1985. Por esto analizamos 37 estudios publicados, desde 1985 hasta 2012, que reportan datos colectados desde antes de 1900 y a lo largo del 2011. Investigamos específicamente si el predominio de la ingesta ha cambiado con el tiempo, qué tipos de residuos se ingieren comúnmente, la distribución geográfica de la ingesta de residuos por tortugas marinas en relación a la distribución global de residuos y cuáles especies y etapas de vida tienen más probabilidad de ingerir residuos. La probabilidad de que las tortugas verdes (Chelonia mydas) y laúd (Dermochelys coriacea) ingieran escombros incrementa significativamente con el tiempo; plástico fue el residuo que más se ingirió. Las tortugas en casi todas las regiones estudiadas ingieren residuos, pero la probabilidad de ingesta no estuvo relacionada con las densidades modeladas de residuos. Además de esto, tortugas más pequeñas, en etapa oceánica de vida, tuvieron una mayor probabilidad de ingerir residuos que las tortugas forrajeras terrestres, mientras que las especies carnívoras tuvieron menos probabilidad de ingerir residuos que las herbívoras o las gelatinívoras. Nuestros resultados indican que las tortugas verdes y laúd tienen el mayor riesgo de efectos letales y subletales de la ingesta de residuos marinos. Para reducir el riesgo, los residuos antropogénicos deben manejarse en un nivel global.Conservation Biology 08/2013; 28(1). DOI:10.1111/cobi.12126 · 4.32 Impact Factor