Are Antidepressant Drugs That Combine Serotonergic and Noradrenergic Mechanisms of Action More Effective Than the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Treating Major Depressive Disorder? A Meta-analysis of Studies of Newer Agents

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Biological Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 10.26). 01/2008; 62(11):1217-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.027
Source: PubMed


Recent studies suggest that the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) with newer antidepressant drugs that simultaneously enhance norepinephrine and serotonin neurotransmission might result in higher response and remission rates than the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The goal of our work was to compare response rates among patients with MDD treated with either of these two broad categories of antidepressant drugs.
Medline/Pubmed, EMBase, clinical trial registries, program syllabi from major psychiatric meetings held since 1995, and documents from relevant pharmaceutical companies were searched for double-blind, randomized trials comparing a newer serotonergic-noradrenergic antidepressant drug (venlafaxine, duloxetine, milnacipran, mirtazapine, mianserin, or moclobemide) with an SSRI for MDD.
Ninety-three trials (n = 17,036) were combined using a random-effects model. Treatment with serotonergic + noradrenergic antidepressant drugs was more likely to result in clinical response than the SSRIs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.059; response rates 63.6% versus 59.3%; p = .003). There was no evidence for heterogeneity among studies combined (p = 1.0). Excluding each individual agent did not significantly alter the pooled RR. With the exception of duloxetine (.985), RRs for response for each individual serotonergic + noradrenergic antidepressant drug were within the 95% confidence interval of the pooled RR (1.019-1.101).
Serotonergic-noradrenergic antidepressant drugs seem to have a modest efficacy advantage compared with SSRIs in MDD. With the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) statistic as one indicator of clinical significance, nearly 24 patients would need to be treated with dual-action antidepressant drugs instead of SSRIs in order to obtain one additional responder. This difference falls well below the mark of NNT = 10 suggested by the United Kingdom's National Institute of Clinical Excellence but nonetheless might be of public health relevance given the large number of depressed patients treated with SSRI /serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant drugs. Further research is needed to examine whether larger differences between classes of antidepressant drugs might exist in specific MDD sub-populations or for specific MDD symptoms.

118 Reads
  • Source
    • "Vilazodone compared with placebo also significantly improved overall anxiety symptoms on the basis of HAMA scores. It is possible that the combined property of serotonin reuptake inhibition and 5-HT1A partial agonism of vilazodone leads to a broader antidepressant efficacy with enhanced anxiolytic efficacy in MDD patients compared with serotonin reuptake inhibition alone (Blier and Ward, 2003; Sussman, 2003; Papakostas et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vilazodone is a potent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and serotonin 1A receptor partial agonist approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. To assess the efficacy of vilazodone across a range of symptoms and severities of depression, data from two phase III, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were pooled for analysis. Overall improvement in depressive symptoms measured using the Montgomery-├ůsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was statistically significant (P<0.05) for vilazodone treatment compared with placebo as early as Week 1 and continued throughout double-blind treatment. Vilazodone treatment compared with placebo showed significant improvement on all 10 individual MADRS symptom items at end of treatment (P<0.01). Rates of response and remission were significantly greater in the vilazodone group relative to the placebo group, with numbers needed to treat ranging from eight to nine for response and 12-17 for remission. Between-group treatment differences in MADRS and the other outcome measures were similar among all depression subgroups, with no consistent pattern associated with depression severity. These findings support the efficacy of vilazodone across a broad range of depressive symptoms and severities for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
    International clinical psychopharmacology 11/2013; 29(2). DOI:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000016 · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Major depressive disorder (MDD) has a devastating effect not only on symptomatic individuals but also on society as a whole, through high medical costs and loss of productivity (Murray and Lopez, 1996; Collins et al, 2011). Despite the enormous societal burden, recent history has seen relatively little progress in treatment efficacy, with the most common non-invasive treatments continuing to demonstrate relatively low response and remission rates (Papakostas et al, 2007; Imel et al, 2008; Gartlehner et al, 2011; Spielmans et al, 2011). There have been calls for personalized treatment approaches to improve response rates (Collins et al, 2011; Kapur et al, 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite its high toll on society, there has been little recent improvement in treatment efficacy for major depressive disorder (MDD). The identification of biological markers of successful treatment response may allow for more personalized and effective treatment. Here we investigate whether resting-state functional connectivity predicted response to treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). Twenty-five individuals with treatment-refractory MDD underwent a 4-week course of dmPFC-rTMS. Before and after treatment, subjects received resting-state functional MRI scans and assessments of depressive symptoms using the Hamilton Depresssion Rating Scale (HAMD17). We found that higher baseline cortico-cortical connectivity (dmPFC-subgenual cingulate and subgenual cingulate to dorsolateral PFC) and lower cortico-thalamic, cortico-striatal, and cortico-limbic connectivity were associated with better treatment outcomes. We also investigated how changes in connectivity over the course of treatment related to improvements in HAMD17 scores. We found that successful treatment was associated with increased dmPFC-thalamic connectivity and decreased subgenual cingulate cortex-caudate connectivity, Our findings provide insight into which individuals might respond to rTMS treatment and the mechanisms through which these treatments work.Neuropsychopharmacology advance online publication, 23 October 2013; doi:10.1038/npp.2013.222.
    Neuropsychopharmacology: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 09/2013; 39(2). DOI:10.1038/npp.2013.222 · 7.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In addition, findings from large meta-analyses have consistently supported the limited efficacy of antidepressants (Miranda et al., 2005; Papakostas et al., 2007; Cipriani et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with chronic or recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) have faced a dearth of treatment options. The present study evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of aripiprazole augmentation for the treatment of chronic or recurrent MDD. This was the first 12-week prospective, multicentre, open-label study of the effectiveness and tolerability of flexibly dosed aripiprazole as an augmentation to ongoing antidepressant treatment in patients with chronic or recurrent MDD. The primary outcome measure for effectiveness was changes between baseline and endpoint (week 12) in total scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Adverse events (AEs) occurring throughout the trial are also reported. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total scores decreased significantly between the baseline and the endpoint (magnitude of difference=-11.6, P<0.0001). At the endpoint, the response rate was 55.2% and the remission rate was 41.3%. Adjunctive aripiprazole treatment administered from week 1 through the endpoint was associated with remission and significant treatment responses. More than half (55.8%) of those taking adjunctive aripiprazole completed the study and relatively few patients discontinued participation because of AEs. None of the patients discontinued participation in the study because of an inadequate therapeutic response. Common AEs included headache, akathisia, insomnia and constipation. The mean dose of aripiprazole at the endpoint was 6.6 mg/day. Adjunctive aripiprazole may be effective and tolerable for patients with chronic or recurrent MDD. Adequately powered and controlled clinical trials should be conducted to confirm our open-label study findings.
    International clinical psychopharmacology 07/2013; 28(6). DOI:10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283643728 · 2.46 Impact Factor
Show more