Article

Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in determining the location of the genial tubercle

University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.72). 08/2007; 137(1):115-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.035
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CT) to predict the location of the genial tubercle.
Cadaver study for anatomic analysis of 17 adult human cadaver heads. Each skull/cadaver head underwent radiographic imaging with cone beam CT and cadaver dissection. Measurements, including mandibular height (MH), genial tubercle width (GTW), genial tubercle height (GTH), distance from inferior border of mandible to genial tubercle (IBM/GT), and mandibular thickness (MT) were recorded.
Statistical analysis with paired t test showed no significant difference between cadaver dissections versus cone beam measurements. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CI) were as follows: GTW (-0.2 to 1.0), GTH (-0.1 to 0.9), distance IBM/GT (-0.8 to 5.0), MH (-1.3 to -2.6), and MT (-0.1 to 0.3).
These results show the accuracy of the 3D cone beam CT in the anatomic location of the genial tubercle.
This radiographic technique may prove useful in pre-operative planning for the mandibular osteotomy in genioglossus advancement procedures.

0 Followers
 · 
180 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genial tubercles usually are small bony protuberances on the lingual aspect of the mandible symphysis. Conversely, this case shows 3D tomographic reconstruction images of genial tubercles as an oversized projection causing pain and discomfort to the patient. KeywordsGenial tubercles-Hypertrophy-Mandible-Radiography-Tomography
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 04/2010; 32(4):415-416. DOI:10.1007/s00276-009-0581-0 · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of cone-beam CT measurements of specific distances around the mandibular canal by comparing them to direct digital caliper measurements. Six formalin-fixed hemimandible specimens were examined using the ILUMA cone-beam CT system. Images were obtained at 120 kVp, 3.8 mA, and a voxel size of 0.2 mm, with an exposure time of 40 seconds. Specimens were cut into sections at 7 locations using a Lindemann burr, and a digital caliper was used to measure the following distances on both the anterior and posterior sides of each section: Mandibular Width (W); Mandibular Length (L); Upper Distance (UD); Lower Distance (LD); Buccal Distance (BD); and Lingual Distance (LID). The same distances were measured on the corresponding cross-sectional cone-beam CT images using the built-in measurement software. All caliper and cone-beam CT measurements were made by 2 independent trained observers and were repeated after an interval of 1 week. The Bland/Altman method was used to calculate intra- and inter-rater reliability. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) from 2-way random effects model were calculated. Agreements between cone-beam CT and direct digital caliper were calculated by ICC for 6 distances and 2 observers. Intraobserver and interobserver measurements for all distances showed high agreement. ICCs for intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.86 to 0.97 for cone-beam CT measurements and from 0.98 to 0.99 for digital caliper measurements. ICCs between observers ranged from 0.84 to 0.97 for the cone-beam CT measurements and from 0.78 to 0.97 for the digital caliper measurements. ICCs for cone-beam CT and direct digital caliper ranged from 0.61 to 0.93 for the first observer and from 0.40 to 0.95 for the second observer. Accuracy of cone-beam CT measurements of various distances surrounding the mandibular canal was comparable to that of digital caliper measurements.
    Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 03/2009; 107(2):e34-42. DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.012 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study reviewed the literature on cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial (OMF) region. A PUBMED search (National Library of Medicine, NCBI; revised 1 December 2007) from 1998 to December 2007 was conducted. This search revealed 375 papers, which were screened in detail. 176 papers were clinically relevant and were analyzed in detail. CBCT is used in OMF surgery and orthodontics for numerous clinical applications, particularly for its low cost, easy accessibility and low radiation compared with multi-slice computerized tomography. The results of this systematic review show that there is a lack of evidence-based data on the radiation dose for CBCT imaging. Terminology and technical device properties and settings were not consistent in the literature. An attempt was made to provide a minimal set of CBCT device-related parameters for dedicated OMF scanners as a guideline for future studies.
    International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 07/2009; 38(6):609-25. DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028 · 1.36 Impact Factor