Testicular microlithiasis: prevalence and risk of concurrent and interval development of testicular tumor in a referred population.

Department of Urology, Ayr Hospital, Dalmellington Road, Ayr, KA6 6DX, UK.
International Urology and Nephrology (Impact Factor: 1.29). 02/2007; 39(4):1177-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-007-9203-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify prevalence of testicular microlithiasis on ultrasound in a referred population and risk of concurrent and interval testicular tumor development.
Retrospective review of our radiology database revealed 4363 scrotal ultrasounds were performed over a six-year period. Ultrasound findings were correlated with our hospital pathological database. The association of intratesticular microlithiasis and confirmed testicular cancers were assessed by means of a Fisher exact test.
Testicular microlithiasis was identified in 32 of the 4259 patients (0.75% of screened population). In the same time period 83 testicular tumors were identified on initial scanning (2.00% of screened population). Three patients with tumor had coexisting microlithiasis (9.4% incidence), whilst a further two had interval development of tumor. The follow-up of the microlithiasis patients ranged from 3 to 72 months (mean 33.9 months, median 40 months).
Interval development of testicular tumor is a documented phenomenon. As the incidence in detection of microlithiasis increases secondary to advances in ultrasound technology, follow-up becomes financially prohibitive. We advocate regular self-examination as the primary follow-up of otherwise well patients with testicular microlithiasis.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previously considered to be a benign finding on scrotal ultrasonography, testicular microlithiasis (TM) is now recognized as a condition associated with the development of testicular neoplasia. Despite this the management of TM remains unclear. We review the evidence for this association and suggested management strategies.
    International Journal of STD & AIDS 09/2012; 23(9):620-2. · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ultrasound surveillance of patients with testicular microlithiasis (TM) has been advocated following the reported association with testicular cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the evidence base supporting such surveillance. Formal literature review identified cohort studies comprising at least 15 patients followed up for at least 24 months. Combining an institutional audit with the identified studies in a pooled analysis the incidence of new cancers during the surveillance period was evaluated. Literature review identified eight studies. Our institutional audit comprised 2,656 men referred for scrotal ultrasound. Fifty-one men (1.92 %) with TM were identified, none of whom developed testicular cancer (mean follow-up: 33.3 months). In a combined population of 389 men testicular cancer developed in 4. Excluding 3 who had additional risk factors, only 1 of 386 developed testicular cancer during follow-up (95 % CI 0.05-1.45 %). Ultrasound surveillance is unlikely to benefit patients with TM in the absence of other risk factors. In the presence of additional risk factors (previous testicular cancer, a history of maldescent or testicular atrophy) patients are likely to be under surveillance; nonetheless monthly self-examination should be encouraged, and open access to ultrasound and formal annual surveillance should be offered. KEY POINTS : • The literature reports a high association between testicular microlithiasis and testicular cancer. • Our study and meta-analysis suggest no causal link between microlithiasis and cancer. • In the absence of additional risk factors surveillance is not advocated. • In the presence of additional risk factors surveillance is recommended. • Such surveillance is primarily aimed at engaging patients in regular follow-up.
    European Radiology 06/2012; 22(11):2540-6. · 4.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bij drie jongens van respectievelijk 15, 9 en 10 jaar werd door middel van echografie de diagnose testiculaire microlithiasis (TM) gesteld. Twee van hen hadden geen klachten, één klaagde over pijn in de testis. TM wordt gekenmerkt door meerdere echorijke foci in de tubuli seminiferi zonder slagschaduw. De oorzaak is grotendeels onbekend. Bij volwassenen bedraagt de prevalentie tussen de 0,2 en 29%, bij jongens tussen de 0,1 en 11,7%. Er zijn aanwijzingen dat TM geassocieerd is met maligne aandoeningen van de testis. Alhoewel er bij volwassenen geen eensluidende richtlijn voor follow-up bestaat, wordt veelal jaarlijkse follow-up geadviseerd. Voor jongens bestaan vrijwel geen richtlijnen. Een driemaandelijks zelfonderzoek gecombineerd met jaarlijks lichamelijk onderzoek en echografie is raadzaam, vooral bij jongens met een al verhoogd risico op testismaligniteiten zoals jongens met een niet-scrotale testis. De prognose, evenzeer ten aanzien van de fertiliteit, is grotendeels onbekend. In three boys aged 15, 9, and 10 years respectively scrotal ultrasound revealed testicular microlithiasis (TM). Two boys were free of symptoms and one suffered from testicular pain. TM is characterized by multiple echogenic foci within the seminiferous tubules with no acoustic shadowing. The pathophysiology is largely unknown. In adult men, TM prevalence has been reported to range from 0.2 to 29%. In boys the prevalence rate varies from 0.1 to 11.7%. There are indications that TM might be associated with malignant conditions of the testes. Although in adult men the method of follow-up is controversial, annual follow-up is usually recommended. In pediatric patients virtually no follow-up guidelines exist. Testicular self-examination, for example three monthly, and annual ultrasound in addition to physical examination might be warranted especially in boys with undescended testis who are already at risk for malignant transformation in the cryptorchid testis. Prognosis, as well as with regard to fertility, is largely unknown.
    Tijdschrift voor kindergeneeskunde 02/2008; 76(1):34-38.