Article

Testicular microlithiasis: prevalence and risk of concurrent and interval development of testicular tumor in a referred population

Department of Urology, Ayr Hospital, Dalmellington Road, Ayr, KA6 6DX, UK.
International Urology and Nephrology (Impact Factor: 1.29). 02/2007; 39(4):1177-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-007-9203-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify prevalence of testicular microlithiasis on ultrasound in a referred population and risk of concurrent and interval testicular tumor development.
Retrospective review of our radiology database revealed 4363 scrotal ultrasounds were performed over a six-year period. Ultrasound findings were correlated with our hospital pathological database. The association of intratesticular microlithiasis and confirmed testicular cancers were assessed by means of a Fisher exact test.
Testicular microlithiasis was identified in 32 of the 4259 patients (0.75% of screened population). In the same time period 83 testicular tumors were identified on initial scanning (2.00% of screened population). Three patients with tumor had coexisting microlithiasis (9.4% incidence), whilst a further two had interval development of tumor. The follow-up of the microlithiasis patients ranged from 3 to 72 months (mean 33.9 months, median 40 months).
Interval development of testicular tumor is a documented phenomenon. As the incidence in detection of microlithiasis increases secondary to advances in ultrasound technology, follow-up becomes financially prohibitive. We advocate regular self-examination as the primary follow-up of otherwise well patients with testicular microlithiasis.

0 Followers
 · 
341 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bij drie jongens van respectievelijk 15, 9 en 10 jaar werd door middel van echografie de diagnose testiculaire microlithiasis (TM) gesteld. Twee van hen hadden geen klachten, één klaagde over pijn in de testis. TM wordt gekenmerkt door meerdere echorijke foci in de tubuli seminiferi zonder slagschaduw. De oorzaak is grotendeels onbekend. Bij volwassenen bedraagt de prevalentie tussen de 0,2 en 29%, bij jongens tussen de 0,1 en 11,7%. Er zijn aanwijzingen dat TM geassocieerd is met maligne aandoeningen van de testis. Alhoewel er bij volwassenen geen eensluidende richtlijn voor follow-up bestaat, wordt veelal jaarlijkse follow-up geadviseerd. Voor jongens bestaan vrijwel geen richtlijnen. Een driemaandelijks zelfonderzoek gecombineerd met jaarlijks lichamelijk onderzoek en echografie is raadzaam, vooral bij jongens met een al verhoogd risico op testismaligniteiten zoals jongens met een niet-scrotale testis. De prognose, evenzeer ten aanzien van de fertiliteit, is grotendeels onbekend. In three boys aged 15, 9, and 10 years respectively scrotal ultrasound revealed testicular microlithiasis (TM). Two boys were free of symptoms and one suffered from testicular pain. TM is characterized by multiple echogenic foci within the seminiferous tubules with no acoustic shadowing. The pathophysiology is largely unknown. In adult men, TM prevalence has been reported to range from 0.2 to 29%. In boys the prevalence rate varies from 0.1 to 11.7%. There are indications that TM might be associated with malignant conditions of the testes. Although in adult men the method of follow-up is controversial, annual follow-up is usually recommended. In pediatric patients virtually no follow-up guidelines exist. Testicular self-examination, for example three monthly, and annual ultrasound in addition to physical examination might be warranted especially in boys with undescended testis who are already at risk for malignant transformation in the cryptorchid testis. Prognosis, as well as with regard to fertility, is largely unknown.
    Tijdschrift voor kindergeneeskunde 02/2008; 76(1):34-38. DOI:10.1007/BF03078173
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Similar to the experience of finding a lump upon physical examination of the breast, the detection of an intrascrotal mass is often a frightening experience for both the patient and his physician. Ultrasound is a nearly ideal modality for evaluation of the scrotum. This manuscript will review the sonographic assessment of the common pathologic and normal conditions that may present as a mass within the scrotum, including discussion of intratesticular and extratesticular etiologies.
    Ultrasound quarterly 12/2009; 25(4):195-205. DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3181c6b42d · 1.40 Impact Factor
Show more