Article

Evolutionary analysis of amino acid repeats across the genomes of 12 Drosophila species.

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics Cornell University, USA.
Molecular Biology and Evolution (Impact Factor: 10.35). 01/2008; 24(12):2598-609. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm129
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Repeated motifs of amino acids within proteins are an abundant feature of eukaryotic sequences and may catalyze the rapid production of genetic and even phenotypic variation among organisms. The completion of the genome sequencing projects of 12 distinct Drosophila species provides a unique dataset to study these intriguing sequence features on a phylogeny with a variety of timescales. We show that there is a higher percentage of proteins containing repeats within the Drosophila genus than most other eukaryotes, including non-Drosphila insects, which makes this collection of species particularly useful for the study of protein repeats. We also find that proteins containing repeats are overrepresented in functional categories involving developmental processes, signaling, and gene regulation. Using the set of 1-to-1 ortholog alignments for the 12 Drosophila species, we test the ability of repeats to act as reliable phylogenetic signals and find that they resolve the generally accepted phylogeny despite the noise caused by their accelerated rate of evolution. We also determine that in general the position of repeats within a protein sequence is non-random, with repeats more often being absent from the middle regions of sequences. Finally we find evidence to suggest that the presence of repeats is associated with an increase in evolutionary rate upon the entire sequence in which they are embedded. With additional evidence to suggest a corresponding elevation in positive selection we propose that some repeats may be inducing compensatory substitutions in their surrounding sequence.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
86 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies of protein evolution have focused on amino acid substitutions with much less systematic analysis on insertion and deletions (indels) in protein coding genes. We hence surveyed 7500 genes between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, using D. yakuba as an outgroup for this purpose. The evolutionary rate of coding indels is indeed low, at only 3% of that of nonsynonymous substitutions. As coding indels follow a geometric distribution in size and tend to fall in low-complexity regions of proteins, it is unclear whether selection or mutation underlies this low rate. To resolve the issue, we collected genomic sequences from an isogenic African line of D. melanogaster (ZS30) at a high coverage of 70X and analyzed indel polymorphism between ZS30 and the reference genome. In comparing polymorphism and divergence, we found that the divergence to polymorphism ratio (i.e. Fixation Index) for smaller indels (size <=10bp) is very similar to that for synonymous changes, suggesting that most of the within-species polymorphism and between-species divergence for indels are selectively neutral. Interestingly, deletions of larger sizes (size >=11bp and <=30bp) have a much higher fixation index than synonymous mutations and 44.4% of fixed middle-sized deletions are estimated to be adaptive. To our surprise, this pattern is not found for insertions. Protein indel evolution appear to be in a dynamic flux of neutrally driven expansion (insertions) together with adaptive driven contraction (deletions) and these observations provide important insights for understanding the fitness of new mutations, as well as the evolutionary driving forces for genomic evolution in Drosophila species.
    Molecular Biology and Evolution 09/2013; · 10.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comparative analysis of multiple genomes in a phylogenetic framework dramatically improves the precision and sensitivity of evolutionary inference, producing more robust results than single-genome analyses can provide. The genomes of 12 Drosophila species, ten of which are presented here for the first time (sechellia, simulans, yakuba, erecta, ananassae, persimilis, willistoni, mojavensis, virilis and grimshawi), illustrate how rates and patterns of sequence divergence across taxa can illuminate evolutionary processes on a genomic scale. These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution. Despite remarkable similarities among these Drosophila species, we identified many putatively non-neutral changes in protein-coding genes, non-coding RNA genes, and cis-regulatory regions. These may prove to underlie differences in the ecology and behaviour of these diverse species.
    Nature 450(7167):203-18. · 38.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Amino acid repeats (AARs) are abundant in protein sequences. They have particular roles in protein function and evolution. Simple repeat patterns generated by DNA slippage tend to introduce length variations and point mutations in repeat regions. Loss of normal and gain of abnormal function owing to their variable length are potential risks leading to diseases. Repeats with complex patterns mostly refer to the functional domain repeats, such as the well-known leucine-rich repeat and WD repeat, which are frequently involved in protein-protein interaction. They are mainly derived from internal gene duplication events and stabilized by 'gate-keeper' residues, which play crucial roles in preventing inter-domain aggregation. AARs are widely distributed in different proteomes across a variety of taxonomic ranges, and especially abundant in eukaryotic proteins. However, their specific evolutionary and functional scenarios are still poorly understood. Identifying AARs in protein sequences is the first step for the further investigation of their biological function and evolutionary mechanism. In principle, this is an NP-hard problem, as most of the repeat fragments are shaped by a series of sophisticated evolutionary events and become latent periodical patterns. It is not possible to define a uniform criterion for detecting and verifying various repeat patterns. Instead, different algorithms based on different strategies have been developed to cope with different repeat patterns. In this review, we attempt to describe the amino acid repeat-detection algorithms currently available and compare their strategies based on an in-depth analysis of the biological significance of protein repeats.
    Briefings in Bioinformatics 02/2013; · 5.30 Impact Factor