Article

Impact of psychotherapeutic support for patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery: 10-year survival results of a randomized trial.

Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (Impact Factor: 17.88). 08/2007; 25(19):2702-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2883
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The impact of psychotherapeutic support on survival for patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery was studied.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted in cooperation with the Departments of General Surgery and Medical Psychology, University Hospital of Hamburg, Germany, from January 1991 to January 1993. Consenting patients (N = 271) with a preliminary diagnosis of cancer of the esophagus, stomach, liver/gallbladder, pancreas, or colon/rectum were stratified by sex and randomly assigned to a control group that received standard care as provided on the surgical wards, or to an experimental group that received formal psychotherapeutic support in addition to routine care during the hospital stay. From June 2003 to December 2003, the 10-year follow-up was conducted. Survival status for all patients was determined from our own records and from three external sources: the Hamburg cancer registry, family doctors, and the general citizen registration offices.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated better survival for the experimental group than the control group. The unadjusted significance level for group differences was P = .0006 for survival to 10 years. Cox regression models that took TNM staging or the residual tumor classification and tumor site into account also found significant differences at 10 years. Secondary analyses found that differences in favor of the experimental group occurred in patients with stomach, pancreatic, primary liver, or colorectal cancer.
The results of this study indicate that patients with gastrointestinal cancer, who undergo surgery for stomach, pancreatic, primary liver, or colorectal cancer, benefit from a formal program of psychotherapeutic support during the inpatient hospital stay in terms of long-term survival.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
68 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychological morbidity in those diagnosed with cancer has been shown to result in poorer quality of life and increase the risk of mortality. As a result, researchers have designed and tested psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and survival of patients diagnosed with cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to describe the psychosocial interventions that have been tested in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Databases such as MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PubMed, MedLine, and Cochrane Reviews were searched. The searches were inclusive of studies published in English between 1966 and October 2013. Raters conducted full-text review of the resulting articles for the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants were 18 years or older, (2) the majority of patients in the sample were diagnosed with a gastrointestinal cancer, (3) the trial was testing a psychosocial intervention, and (4) random assignment to one or more interventions versus a usual care, placebo, attention control, or waiting-list control condition. The interventions that were eligible for this review included psychosocial or behavioral intervention (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, problem solving, educational, and collaborative care), physical activity, and/or psychopharmacologic treatment (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). Interventions that included dietary changes were not included in the present review. Study quality was also assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) system. The results of the review resulted in a finding of eight studies to have been conducted, testing psychosocial interventions, in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Findings of these studies suggested that the interventions were effective in reducing psychological and physical symptoms associated with the cancer, improved quality of life, and reduced immune system dysregulation, and one study demonstrated an improvement in survival. Two studies reported no benefit from psychosocial intervention when compared with a control group. The quality of the studies varied greatly, but reporting of the details of the trials, and the methodological rigor, improved over time. Further research is warranted to design and test interventions that may be effective in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancers.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 04/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Psychotherapy is an effective and often highly cost-effective medical intervention for many serious psychiatric conditions. Psychotherapy can also lead to savings in other medical and societal costs. It is at times the firstline and most important treatment and at other times augments the efficacy of psychotropic medication. Many patients are in need of more prolonged and intensive psychotherapy, including those with personality disorders and those with chronic complex psychiatric conditions often with severe anxiety and depression. Many patients with serious and complex psychiatric illness have experienced severe early life trauma in an atmosphere in which family members or caretakers themselves have serious psychiatric disorders. Children and adolescents with learning disabilities and those with severe psychiatric disorders can also require more than brief treatment. Other diagnostic groups for whom psychotherapy is effective and cost-effective include patients with schizophrenia, anxiety disorders (including posttraumatic stress disorder), depression, and substance abuse. In addition, psychotherapy for the medically ill with concomitant psychiatric illness often lowers medical costs, improves recovery from medical illness, and at times even prolongs life compared to similar patients not given psychotherapy. While "cost-effective" treatments can yield savings in healthcare costs, disability claims, and other societal costs, "cost-effective" by no means translates to "cheap" but instead describes treatments that are clinically effective and provided at a cost that is considered reasonable given the benefit they provide, even if the treatments increase direct expenses. In the current insurance climate in which Mental Health Parity is the law, insurers nonetheless often use their own non-research and non-clinically based medical necessity guidelines to subvert it and limit access to appropriate psychotherapeutic treatments. Many patients, especially those who need extended and intensive psychotherapy, are at risk of receiving substandard care due to inadequate insurance reimbursement. These patients remain vulnerable to residual illness and the concomitant sequelae in lost productivity, dysfunctional interpersonal and family relationships, comorbidity including increased medical and surgical services, and increased mortality.
    Psychodynamic psychiatry. 09/2014; 42(3):423-457.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Collective evidence points to a prominent role of stress in cancer growth and metastasis. Despite these results an etio-pathogenetic role has not been widely accepted. Reasons of controversies are the coexistence in stressed patients of high risk habits, the sample size, the heterogeneity and the retrospective origins of these studies. Experimental data and clinical observations argue about the possibility of an interaction between psychosocial events and tumours. However the number of involved variables and the long period of observation prevent with current technologies the definition of causal versus chaotic sequences of this hypothetical relationship. Psychotherapy may help to face up to stressful events, but its role e remains uncertain. Stress works through sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic– pituitary–adrenal axis activation, along with related hormones, that have functionally and biologically significant impacts on the tumor microenvironment. This paper collects evidences through the hypothesis of correlation between stress, psychological factors and cancer focusing both on psychology and on molecular biology. Knowledge on stress induced neuroendocrine dynamics in the tumor microenvironment might allow the development of integrated pharmacological and bio-behavioral strategies to create more successful cancer therapies.
    Journal of Cancer Therapeutics & Research. 10/2014; Denaro et al. Journal of Cancer Therapeutics & Research 2014, http://www.hoajonline.com/journals/pdf/2049-7962-3-4.pdf.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
14 Downloads
Available from
Jun 4, 2014