Article

Facial port-wine stains - clinical stratification and risks of neuro-ocular involvement

Centre for Study & Treatment of Vascular Birthmarks, Wellington Regional Plastic, Maxillofacial & Burns Unit, Hutt Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.47). 07/2007; 61(8):889-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.05.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Port-wine stains are capillary malformations that commonly involve the skin of the head and neck region. They may affect the underlying subcutaneous tissue and bone, and extend on to adjacent mucous membrane and conjunctiva. Ipsilateral leptomeningeal and ocular choroidal involvement occurs in a small number of cases, with variable clinical manifestations.
To analyse a series of consecutive patients with facial port-wine stains referred to our Vascular Anomalies Centre to (1) stratify their clinical manifestations, and (2) identify the risks of neurological and/or ocular involvement according to topographic pattern.
Consecutive patients with facial port-wine stains were taken from our Vascular Anomalies Database 1996-2006. Port-wine stains were topographically analysed and mapped to the sensory distribution of division(s) of the trigeminal nerve, cervical plexus, and dorsal rami of the spinal nerves.
158 patients were identified. Many of these patients had extension of their facial port-wine stains or additional separate port-wine stains on their scalp, neck, trunk or limbs. Involvement of adjacent mucosa, conjunctiva, underlying soft tissue and bone was common. Fifteen patients had associated neurological and/or ocular complications. All had port-wine stains in V1 distribution. Additional involvement of V2 and/or V3, and bilaterality were common. Seven of the nine patients (78%) with port-wine stains affecting the entire V1 had neurological and/or ocular involvement. The risk of associated neurological and/or ocular disorder in a patient with partial or full V1 involvement was 26%, glaucoma and epilepsy being the most common manifestations.
The clinical stratification of facial port-wine stains provides a guide to patient counselling and therapeutic interventions. Port-wine stains affecting the entire V1 distribution predict strongly for underlying neurological and/or ocular disorders that require on-going ophthalmological surveillance and/or neurological management. Although the classical Sturge-Weber syndrome encompasses a triad of clinical manifestations, incomplete forms are not uncommon. This neuro-oculo-cutaneous syndrome is believed to be a result of vascular malformations of associated structures derived from the neuroectoderm (facial skin, eye, and parieto-occipital region of the brain and leptomeninges) during the first trimester. However, the pathogenesis of port-wine stains and Sturge-Weber syndrome remains unclear.

0 Followers
 · 
281 Views
  • Sultan Qaboos University medical journal 05/2014; 14(2):e155-e156.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The term vascular anomaly represents a broad spectrum of vascular pathology, including proliferating vascular tumours and vascular malformations. While the treatment of most vascular anomalies is multifactorial, interventional radiology procedures, including embolic therapy, sclerotherapy and laser coagulation among others, are playing an increasingly important role in vascular anomaly management. This review discusses the diagnosis and treatment of common vascular malformations, with emphasis on the technique, efficacy and complications of different interventional radiology procedures.
    The British journal of radiology 03/2014; 87(1035):20130392. DOI:10.1259/bjr.20130392 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Facial port wine stains (PWS) are usually isolated findings, however, when associated with cerebral and ocular vascular malformations they form part of the classical triad of Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS). Our aim was to evaluate the associations between the phenotype of facial PWS and the diagnosis of SWS in a cohort with a high rate of SWS.Methods Records were reviewed of all 192 children with a facial PWS seen in 2011-13. Adverse outcome measures were clinical (seizures, abnormal neurodevelopment, glaucoma) and radiological (abnormal MRI), modelled by multivariate logistic regression.ResultsThe best predictor of adverse outcomes was a PWS involving a newly-delineated “forehead area”, stretching from the midline of the forehead to a line joining the outer canthus of the eye to the top of the ear, and including the upper eyelid. This involves all three divisions of the trigeminal nerve, but corresponds well to the embryonic vascular development of the face. Bilateral distribution was not an independently significant phenotypic feature. Abnormal MRI was a better predictor of all clinical adverse outcome measures than PWS distribution, however for practical reasons guidelines based on clinical phenotype are proposed.Conclusion Facial PWS distribution appears to follow the embryonic vasculature of the face, rather than the trigeminal nerve. We propose that children with a PWS in any part of the “forehead area” should have an urgent ophthalmology review, and a brain MRI. A prospective study has been established to test the validity of these guidelines.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    British Journal of Dermatology 06/2014; 171(4). DOI:10.1111/bjd.13203 · 4.10 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
45 Downloads
Available from
May 17, 2014