Normality and impairment following profound early institutional deprivation: a longitudinal follow-up into early adolescence.

Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, England. .
Developmental Psychology (Impact Factor: 3.21). 07/2007; 43(4):931-46. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.93
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Longitudinal analyses on normal versus impaired functioning across 7 domains were conducted in children who had experienced profound institutional deprivation up to the age of 42 months and were adopted from Romania into U.K. families. Comparisons were made with noninstitutionalized children adopted from Romania and with nondeprived within-U.K. adoptees placed before the age of 6 months. Specifically, the validity of the assessment, the degree of continuity and change in levels of functioning from 6 to 11 years, and the factors in the pre- and postadoption environment accounting for heterogeneity in outcome were examined. Pervasive impairment was significantly raised in children experiencing institutional deprivation for > or =6 months of life, with a minority within this group showing no impairment. There was no additional significant effect of duration of deprivation beyond the 6-month cutoff, and few other predictors explained outcome. The pattern of normality/impairment was mainly established by 6 years of age, with considerable continuity at the individual level between 6 and 11 years. The findings are discussed in terms of the possibility of a sensitive period for development.


Available from: Thomas G O'Connor, Apr 25, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Behavioural problems in adoptees have been related to adverse circumstances prior to adoption. We examined pre-adoptive risk factors and post-adoptive behavioural problems in children adopted from Poland. Dutch adoptive parents of 133 Polish adoptees (M-age = 8.7 years, range 2.8-15.2; M-ageadoption = 3.0 years, range .4-6.9) answered the Child Behaviour Checklist and questions regarding pre-adoptive risk factors, such as institutionalization, neglect and abuse. Polish adoptees in our sample were four times more likely to have clinical behavioural problems than non-adopted children. Compared with a group of children adopted from various countries, predominantly from Asia, Polish adoptees had higher levels of behavioural problems as well. Multiple pre-adoptive risk factors were present. Only a history of abuse was found to be associated with behavioural problems after adoption. Special attention and support after adoption are needed for these children and their adoptive parents, especially when a pre-adoptive history of abuse is known.
    European Journal of Developmental Psychology 06/2014; 11(6):701-715. DOI:10.1080/17405629.2014.930684 · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current frameworks for understanding the link between early adverse childhood experiences and later negative life outcomes, including psychopathology, focus on the mediating negative impact on brain and biological systems in the developing child resulting broadly from stress and trauma. While this approach is useful, we argue that the framework could be functionally extended by distinguishing the effects of two different types of negative input, both deviations from the expectable environment in early childhood. Specifically, we review the consequences of inadequate input (e.g., neglect/deprivation) and harmful input (e.g., abuse/trauma) on brain and biological development. We then review evidence on the differential links between each type of abnormal input to four selected domains of psychopathology (indiscriminate social behavior, posttraumatic stress disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and conduct problems), and consider potential mechanisms for inadequate and harmful input to lead to these outcomes. We conclude that the careful consideration of the type of deviation from the expected environment, while acknowledging the practical difficulties in assessing this, is likely to lead to clearer understanding of the mechanism of risk for psychopathology, and that tailored approaches to prevention and intervention may be informed by considering the unique consequences of inadequate and harmful input when experienced in early childhood.Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews accepted article preview online, 07 July 2014; doi:10.1038/npp.2014.165.
    Neuropsychopharmacology: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 07/2014; DOI:10.1038/npp.2014.165 · 7.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Santrauka. Tikslas. Dauguma iki šiol atliktų tapatumo tyrimų daugiausia remiasi J. Marcia struktūriniu tapatumo supratimu. Tačiau pastaraisiais metais tapatumas apibrėžiamas kaip santykiuose besiformuojanti dinaminė sistema, kurios pagrindas – emocijos. O tapatumo formavimasis – tai intrapsichinių pasikeitimų paauglystėje visuma: at-siskyrimo ir individuacijos procesas, ankstyvųjų emociškai skausmingų patyrimų in-tegracija bei ego tęstinumo įtvirtinimas. Todėl siekiant analizuoti, kaip vyksta globos namuose gyvenančių paauglių tapatumo formavimasis, remiamasi biografinių pasa-kojimų interpretacine analize. Metodai. Atliktas kokybinis tyrimas, kuriame naudoti metodai: biografinio pasakojimo interpretacinis metodas, dokumentų analizė. Tyrime dalyvavo šeši (3 merginos ir 3 vaikinai) 15–16 metų paaugliai, gyvenantys globos na-muose. Rezultatai, išvados. Tyrimo rezultatų interpretacinė analizė atskleidė tris biogra-finio pasakojimo tipus: kova kaip išgyvenimo būdas, fantazijos ir svajonės kaip būdas atlaikyti realybę ir fragmentuotas gyvenimo istorijos pasakojimas – paslėpta savastis. Rezultatai atskleidžia, kaip skirtingi biografinio pasakojimo tipai susiję su skirtinga ta-patumo formavimosi paauglystėje dinamika. Taip pat patvirtinama artimų ir ilgalaikių santykių svarba gyvenimo istorijai kurti ir trauminio patyrimo įveikos procesui. Pagrindiniai žodžiai: tapatumas, biografinio pasakojimo interpretacinė analizė, globos namai, paauglystė. 1 Susirašinėjimui: Universiteto 9/1, Vilnius LT-01513, Lietuva; el. paštas: astazb@gmail. com; tel. +370 688 73497.