Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS.

Harvard Medical School and the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Nature Clinical Practice Neurology (Impact Factor: 7.64). 08/2007; 3(7):383-93. DOI: 10.1038/ncpneuro0530
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In neurology, as in all branches of medicine, symptoms of disease and the resulting burden of illness and disability are not simply the consequence of the injury, inflammation or dysfunction of a given organ; they also reflect the consequences of the nervous system's attempt to adapt to the insult. This plastic response includes compensatory changes that prove adaptive for the individual, as well as changes that contribute to functional disability and are, therefore, maladaptive. In this context, brain stimulation techniques tailored to modulate individual plastic changes associated with neurological diseases might enhance clinical benefits and minimize adverse effects. In this Review, we discuss the use of two noninvasive brain stimulation techniques--repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation--to modulate activity in the targeted cortex or in a dysfunctional network, to restore an adaptive equilibrium in a disrupted network for best behavioral outcome, and to suppress plastic changes for functional advantage. We review randomized controlled studies, in focal epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, recovery from stroke, and chronic pain, to illustrate these principles, and we present evidence for the clinical effects of these two techniques.


Available from: Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Jun 03, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The sources of inter-subject variability in the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) remain unknown. One potential source of variations is the brain's electric field, which varies according to each individual's anatomical features. We employed an approach that combines imaging and computational modeling to quantitatively study the extent and primary causes of inter-subject variation in tDCS electric fields. Anatomically-accurate models of the head and brain of 24 males (age: 38.63 ± 11.24 years) were constructed from structural MRI. Finite-element method was used to computationally estimate the electric fields for tDCS of the motor cortex. Surface-based inter-subject registration of the electric field and functional MRI data was used for group level statistical analysis. We observed large differences in each individual's electric field patterns. However, group level analysis revealed that the average electric fields concentrated in the vicinity of the primary motor cortex. The variations in the electric fields in the hand motor area could be characterized by a normal distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 20% of the mean. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) thickness was the primary factor influencing an individual's electric field, thereby explaining 50% of the inter-individual variability, a thicker layer of CSF decreasing the electric field strength. The variability in the electric fields is related to each individual's anatomical features and can only be controlled using detailed image processing. Age was found to have a slight negative effect on the electric field, which might have implications on tDCS studies on aging brains. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Brain Stimulation 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.002 · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study aimed to evaluate the effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy older adults and patients with Alzheimer's disease. A comprehensive literature search was performed on noninvasive stimulation studies published from January 1990 to November 2014 in Pubmed and Web of Science. Fourteen articles with a total of 331 participants were identified as studies with healthy older adults, and the mean effect size and 95% confidence interval were estimated. A significant effect size of 0.42 was found for the cognitive outcome. Further subgroup analyses demonstrated more prominent effects for studies delivering the stimulation before the execution of the task and studies applying multiple sessions of stimulation. To assess the effects of stimulation on Alzheimer's disease patients, 11 studies with a total of 200 patients were included in the analysis. A significant effect size of 1.35 was found for the cognitive outcomes. Subgroup analyses indicated more pronounced effects for studies applying the stimulation during the execution of the task compared with studies delivering the stimulation before the execution of the task. Noninvasive brain stimulation has a positive effect on cognitive function in physiological and pathological aging. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Neurobiology of Aging 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.04.016 · 4.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been proposed to play an important role in neural processes that underlie multitasking performance. However, this claim is underexplored in terms of direct causal evidence.
    Cortex 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.014 · 6.04 Impact Factor