Article

Duration of second or greater complete clinical remission in ovarian cancer: Exploring potential endpoints for clinical trials

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
Gynecologic Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.69). 10/2007; 106(3):469-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To explore benchmarks for future consolidation strategies, we evaluated a strictly defined (normal CA-125 and normal CT) second-complete-remission (CR) ovarian cancer population for 1) the median progression-free survival (PFS), 2) the frequency with which second remission exceeds first, and 3) the proportion of patients in remission at given time points.
Retrospective sampling was carried out at Memorial Sloan-Kettering (10/1993-12/2000) and the Royal Marsden Hospital (1/1995-4/2003) for the following: histological confirmation and elevated CA-125 at diagnosis; primary surgery; first-and second-line platinum-based chemotherapy with CR; and no maintenance therapy.
In 35 patients 1) the duration of first PFS was 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.2-24.5 months) and second PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-12.2 months); 2) the number of patients with second response longer than first was 3/35 (9%); 3) the proportion of patients remaining in second complete remission was 100% (3 months), 100% (6 months), 83% (9 months), 34% (12 months), 23% (15 months) and 8.6% (18 months), respectively.
1) The median PFS from second complete remission is short. 2) A second response is rarely longer than the first even in this second CR population. 3) The number of patients with a second response longer than the first, or the proportion of patients remaining in complete remission at given time points could be evaluated as an outcome measure in future studies.

0 Followers
 · 
69 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current study was conducted to determine the effect of goserelin and bicalutamide on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who were in second or greater complete disease remission. Patients received bicalutamide at a dose of 50 mg orally daily and goserelin at a dose of 3.6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks. CA 125 was obtained monthly, with computed tomography performed every 3 months. Correlative studies included serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, vascular endothelial growth factor, free testosterone, and androstenedione and the germline polymorphisms CYP19A1 and androgen receptor. Between October of 2000 and October of 2002, 35 patients were enrolled. Three patients (9%) received therapy at the time of first disease remission and were removed from the study, and 1 patient (3%) was removed for liver function test abnormalities. The most frequent toxicities were grade 1 alkaline phosphatase (54%), fatigue (57%), and hot flashes (42%) based on the National Cancer Institute common toxicity scale, version 2.0. The PFS for patients receiving protocol therapy in second disease remission (21 patients) was 11.4 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.2-12.6 months). The PFS for patients receiving protocol therapy in third or fourth disease remission (11 patients) was 11.9 months (95% CI, 10.8-14.1 months). The percentage of patients remaining in second disease remission at given times are: 100% at 3 months, 100% at 6 months, 72% at 9 months, 47% at 12 months, 28% at 15 months, 22% at 18 months, 19% at 21 months, and 13% at 24 months. There were no associations noted between androgen receptor repeat number, genotype, allelotype, or haplotypes and PFS. The use of goserelin and bicalutamide did not appear to prolong PFS in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in second or greater complete disease remission. The number of patients in disease remission at given time points may serve as a clinical trial endpoint for future studies of consolidation therapy.
    Cancer 12/2007; 110(11):2448-56. DOI:10.1002/cncr.23072 · 4.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For several reasons, ovarian cancer is an excellent malignancy to consider the use of 'targeted' therapeutic strategies. However, to date, despite considerable effort, there remains limited evidence that such approaches are clinically relevant in the malignancy. The one important exception is the delivery of anti-angiogenic anti-neoplastic agents, which actually appear to be more biologically active as single drugs in ovarian cancer than in other solid tumors where they have been examined. It is anticipated that future trials of 'targeted' therapy in ovarian cancer will focus on molecular targets of documented relevance in the malignancy.
    Oncology 02/2008; 74(1-2):1-6. DOI:10.1159/000138349 · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • Gynecologic Oncology 03/2008; 108(3):659–660. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.032 · 3.69 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from