Health and productivity as a business strategy

Matria Healthcare, 1850 Parkway Place, Marietta, GA 30067, USA.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.8). 08/2007; 49(7):712-21. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318133a4be
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to assess the magnitude of health-related lost productivity relative to medical and pharmacy costs for four employers and assess the business implications of a "full-cost" approach to managing health.
A database was developed by integrating medical and pharmacy claims data with employee self-report productivity and health information collected through the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Information collected on employer business measures were combined with this database to model health-related lost productivity.
1) Health-related productivity costs were more than four times greater than medical and pharmacy costs. 2) The full cost of poor health is driven by different health conditions than those driving medical and pharmacy costs alone.
This study demonstrates that Integrated Population Health & Productivity Management should be built on a foundation of Integrated Population Health & Productivity Measurement. Therefore, employers would reveal a blueprint for action for their integrated health and productivity enhancement strategies by measuring the full health and productivity costs related to the burdens of illness and health risk in their population.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael Taitel, Aug 08, 2015
  • Source
    • "The indirect costs include overtime wages, labor turnover, new employee training, lost working days (Oxenburgh and Marlow, 2005) and reputational damage (de Koster et al., 2011). Previous studies have highlighted that an OHSMS can be an effective tool to reduce accidents and illnesses among workers, leading to lower absenteeism and labor turnover and a general reduction in these costs (e.g., de Koster et al., 2011; Loeppke et al., 2007). From this it could be concluded that improved safety performance should improve a firm's profitability (Robson et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Today, manufacturing firms encounter pressure from multiple stakeholders to manage occupational health and safety issues properly, systematically and transparently. While manufacturing firms commonly use internally developed Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems, there is growing pressure to adopt externally certified system such as OHSAS 18001. However, there are conflicting views and little empirical evidence that examines the linkage between OHSAS 18001 certification and operating performance. Hence, this paper examines the impact of OHSAS 18001 on operational performance through three theoretical lenses: Institutional Theory, Normal Accident Theory, and High Reliability Theory. We also investigate how complexity and coupling moderate the relationship between OHSAS 18001 and operational performance. Based on a sample of 211 U.S. listed manufacturing firms with OHSAS 18001 certification, we find that certification leads to significant increases in abnormal performance on safety, sales growth, labor productivity, and profitability and that these benefits increase as complexity and coupling increase.
    Journal of Operations Management 07/2014; 32(5). DOI:10.1016/j.jom.2014.04.004 · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Health and safety management systems, which involve systematic risk management programmes and policies, can have an essential influence on firm performance (Loeppke et al. 2007; Bottani, Monica and Vignali 2008; Miller and Haslam 2009). Unsafe work practices are frequently the result of system processes developed within organisations which predispose workers to act unsafely (Hughes and Kornowa-Weichel 2004). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hospitals are under pressure to achieve high levels of clinical performance. Some research has demonstrated that HRM processes positively influence organisational-level performance, but these effects are often examined in isolation, without exploring how they may influence performance via interactions with other sub-system processes. In this study, we develop and test a model of how HRM processes influence hospitals' clinical performance (continuity of quality patient care) in the context of processes emerging from three other hospital sub-systems (strategic and operations management, information management, and health and safety). Utilising rigorous multi-rated, industry-based hospital accreditation data relating to 465 Australian hospitals, we first evaluated the construct validity, reliability and discriminant validity of the data as being reflective of the clinical performance outcome, and the enacted processes emerging from four distinct hospital sub-systems. In testing the hypotheses, we found that in the context of management, information management, and health and safety processes, the effective functioning of HRM processes significantly influenced the continuity of quality patient care. There was also further evidence that the effectiveness of HRM processes significantly moderated the relationships between: (1) strategic and operations management processes; and (2) health and safety processes and the continuity of quality patient care. On the basis of these findings, we argue that the simultaneous and interdependent influence of multiple processes should be considered when examining the influence of the effective functioning of HRM processes on organisational-level performance in hospitals.
    The International Journal of Human Resource Management 09/2013; 24(16). DOI:10.1080/09585192.2013.775028 · 0.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Savvy business leaders recognize the critical role that mental health factors play in the overall success of their company. This understanding has guided the development of a new approach to the design of employee health benefits called Health and Productivity Management (Kramer & Rickert, 2006; Loeppke et al., 2007). For example, a recent survey of senior human resources (HR) executives found that mental health is now considered the number one driver of indirect business costs, such as lost productivity and absence (Employee Benefit News, 2007). "
    International Handbook of Work and Health Psychology, Third Edition, 12/2009: pages 383 - 407; , ISBN: 9780470682357
Show more