The Prevalence Of Food Allergy: A Meta-analysis

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Impact Factor: 11.48). 10/2007; 120(3):638-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.05.026
Source: PubMed


There is uncertainty about the prevalence of food allergy in communities.
To assess the prevalence of food allergy by performing a meta-analysis according to the method of assessment used.
The foods assessed were cow's milk, hen's egg, peanut, fish, shellfish, and an overall estimate of food allergy. We summarized the information in 5 categories: self-reported symptoms, specific IgE positive, specific skin prick test positive, symptoms combined with sensitization, and food challenge studies. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for publications since 1990. The meta-analysis included only original studies. They were stratified by age groups: infant/preschool, school children, and adults.
A total of 934 articles were identified, but only 51 were considered appropriate for inclusion. The prevalence of self-reported food allergy was very high compared with objective measures. There was marked heterogeneity between studies regardless of type of assessment or food item considered, and in most analyses this persisted after age stratification. Self-reported prevalence of food allergy varied from 1.2% to 17% for milk, 0.2% to 7% for egg, 0% to 2% for peanuts and fish, 0% to 10% for shellfish, and 3% to 35% for any food.
There is a marked heterogeneity in the prevalence of food allergy that could be a result of differences in study design or methodology, or differences between populations.
We recommend that measurements be made by using standardized methods, if possible food challenge. We need to be cautious in estimates of prevalence based only on self-reported food allergy.

437 Reads
  • Source
    • "EC 1420/13). Ensuring product authenticity and adequate legislative powers should improve the health-related aspects linked to correct consumer information, especially with regard to the use of fish containing species-specific allergens (Rona et al., 2007; Sharp and Lopata, 2014). Additionally, it is noteworthy to observe that most of these fish products come from outside Europe, where controls on farming sites, pathogens and bioaccumulation of heavy metals are lacking, and there may be polluted waters (Filonzi et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Considering that seafood mislabeling has been widely reported throughout the world and that the authentication of food components is one of the key issues in food safety, quality and sustainability, the aim of this study was to use DNA barcoding to investigate the prevalence of mislabeling among fish fillet products from markets and supermarkets located in Apulia (SE Italy). The study reveals a high degree of species mislabeling in fish fillet products. In particular, this study shows that the labels of only 32/200 fish fillet samples provided comprehensive information relating to commercial designation, scientific name, geographical area, production method and whether previously frozen. The labeling of other samples was not compliant with European legislation. Indeed, the scientific name, which must also be indicated from 1st January 2012, according to Article 68 of EU Commission Implementing Regulation No. 404/2011, was missing in 157/168 samples, the geographical area was missing in 152/168, while the commercial designation and the production method were reported in all samples. Furthermore, results from molecular investigations reveal a high occurrence of incorrect species declaration in fish fillet products. The commercial and/or scientific name declared failed to match the species identified in 164/200 (82%) samples. The study also highlighted that threatened, Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN) and Critically Endangered (CR) species considered to be facing a high risk of extinction has been used in the place of commercial species. This study thus provides further evidence of the need for increased traceability and assessment of food product authenticity. Additionally, traceability may improve the management of hazards related to fish safety, as well as guaranteeing product authenticity, providing reliable information to customers, enhancing supply-side management and improving product quality and sustainability.
    Fisheries Research 10/2015; 170. DOI:10.1016/j.fishres.2015.05.006 · 1.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Thus, pre-packaged foodstuffs must comply with the rules on labeling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs, ensuring product authenticity and correct consumer information. Also the legislation should consider the sanitary aspects, species-specific fish allergens (Rona et al., 2007; Sharp and Lopata, 2014; Taylor, Kabourek, & Hefle, 2004; Woo and Bahna, 2011) linked to use of the generic name, ''fish'', which can be used in the ingredients list instead of a more specific name to describe any species of fish. Furthermore, factors such as traceability, quality, and sustainability criteria have become an integral part of the sale contract requirements, thus leading to changes in the selection of raw material by the processing industry. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Given the increase in the international trade of packaged frozen fishery products, this study used DNA barcoding to investigate the breaded hake and plaice species, sold in Italian markets. The results of this study generally matched the ingredient list on the food label. Only 6 of the 120 samples were non-compliant. Specifically, breaded merluccius samples match the species shown in the list of ingredients on the label. Of the ''breaded plaice'' samples, 4/14 contained Lepidopsetta polyxystra and 2/14 Merluccius gayi, thus failing to match the ingredient list on the label. Considering the European legislation indicates that the label must not mislead consumers, but international trade and the use of similar terms for different products makes it complicated when a product from one country is introduced into another in which the niche already exists, clear labeling is strongly recommended in order to ensure that consumers can make conscious choices.
    Food Chemistry 08/2015; 194:279-83. DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.135 · 3.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Both food industries and researchers are trying to find ways to prevent allergen crosscontamination of food products and also design and develop novel processing methods and food products that can be catered to allergic populations (Vanga et al. 2015). A wide number of literature surveys and meta-analysis conducted on prevalence of food allergies are available (Rona et al. 2007; Anandan et al. 2009). But more and more research is required to find accurate interventions to prevent the advent of food allergies from medical, social and engineering perspective. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, our aim is to evaluate the global scientific publications produced in the field of food allergy over the past 14 years. The Web of Science (WoS) was considered as the primary database consisting of both Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). This analysis provides an insight into the number of papers, journals, subjects, citations and the overall trend of research. A total of 8327 articles were considered for this study published between 2001 and 2014 in over a hundred journals. There has been a growing concern in the population as the food allergies are on an alarming rise over the past decade. Till date, research has failed to come up with a solution for this issue except for a complete abstinence of that food/ingredient from the diet. This new Bibliometric method would help the researchers in this field to understand the landscape of food allergy research, and set up the future research direction.
    Scientometrics 08/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1660-0 · 2.18 Impact Factor
Show more