Surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.88). 11/2007; 463(463):98-106. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181483dc4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT For the minority of people with lateral epicondylitis who do not respond to nonoperative treatment, surgical intervention is an option, but confusion exists because of the plethora of options. The surgical techniques for treating lateral epicondylitis can be grouped into three main categories: open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic. Our primary question was whether there was clear evidence suggesting one of these three approaches was superior in relieving pain, restoring strength, or reducing time to return to work. A 2002 Cochrane Collaboration Database review found no conclusions could be drawn regarding the efficacy of operative treatment given the lack of controlled trials. Although there is not enough literature to conduct a meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed the available literature to address our questions. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to each procedure, no technique appears superior by any measure. Therefore, until more randomized, controlled trials are done, it is reasonable to defer to individual surgeons regarding experience and ease of procedure.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medial epicondylar tendinopathy, also known as golfer's elbow, is less common than lateral elbow tendinopathy. Overhead throwing athletes and those participating in sports that require repeated forearm pronation and wrist flexion are most commonly affected by this disorder. This problem predominates in amateur as opposed to professional athletes and is also seen more commonly in patients over 40 years of age. This review will begin by outlining the incidence, history, and physical examination of medial epicondylar tendinopathy, including a new clinical test. Imaging modalities, nonoperative, and operative treatments will then be outlined. Finally, future directions will be explored including emerging biological therapies.
    Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review 09/2014; 22(3):164-168. DOI:10.1097/JSA.0000000000000031 · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis respond well to conservative management. For patients who do not respond to nonoperative modalities, surgical treatment represents a viable option for long-term symptomatic relief. The arthroscopic surgical technique described in this article has been consistently used by the senior author for the treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis for more than 5 years (198 patients) without the occurrence of any major complications and appears to be a safe, reliable, and efficacious surgical intervention for the management of lateral epicondylitis.
    02/2014; 3(1):e135-9. DOI:10.1016/j.eats.2013.09.006
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose In recalcitrant epicondylitis innumerable operative techniques have been published, nevertheless a certain percentage of patients remains symptomatic after operative treatment. We developed an individual, systematic diagnostic pathway including arthroscopic assessment of elbow stability to identify the optimal and respectively less invasive therapy. Methods We so far included 40 patients with recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (mean age 46 +/- 11). 5 patients had previous surgery. In all patients, we did an elbow arthroscopy and a systematic arthroscopic stability testing. 25 patients were treated exclusively arthroscopically once instability was excluded. In 13 patients with slight instability, we did an open debridement of the lateral tendon complex and local refixation. Two patients with severe instability were treated with open debridement and additional stabilization of the LUCL with a trizeps graft. With a minimum follow-up of 1 year, we assessed the DASH score and subjective patient satisfaction. Results Mean follow-up was 24 +/- 12 months, mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 19 +/- 18 months. The mean DASH score at follow-up was 22 +/- 19.36 patients reported symptoms improvement, 34 patients would repeat surgery given the same situation; in 30 cases, patients expectations had been fulfilled. We did not observe any intraoperative complications or infections. One patient developed joint stiffness requiring reoperation. Conclusion Using a systematic diagnostic pathway including assessment of elbow stability and consecutive individualized, respectively, less invasive surgical procedure we acquired high patients satisfaction and good clinical outcome with a low complication rate.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 09/2014; 134(12). DOI:10.1007/s00402-014-2087-4 · 1.31 Impact Factor