SIRPalpha1 and SIRPalpha2: their role as tumor suppressors in breast carcinoma cells.
ABSTRACT We have previously reported that expression of SIRPalpha1/SHPS-1 was strongly suppressed in v-Src-transformed cells and its forced expression resulted in the suppression of anchorage-independent growth of the cells [K. Machida, S. Matsuda, K. Yamaki, T. Senga, A.A. Thant, H. Kurata, K. Miyazaki, K. Hayashi, T. Okuda, T. Kitamura, T. Hayakawa, M. Hamaguchi, v-Src suppresses SHPS-1 expression via the Ras-MAP kinase pathway to promote the oncogenic growth of cells, Oncogene 19 (2000) 1710-1718]. We examined the effect of human SIRPalpha1 expression in breast cancer cell lines, Hs578T and MCF7, and compared with the effect of SIRPalpha2 expression in Hs578T. Forced expression of either SIRPalpha1 or SIRPalpha2 did not perturb the growth of Hs578T in a conventional attached condition. Their expression, however, enforced the actin stress fiber formation and induced activation of Rho, but not Rac, in Hs578T cells. Moreover, forced expression of either SIRPalpha1 or SIRPalpha2 displayed distinct suppressive effect on the anchorage-independent growth of Hs578T cells. Similarly, forced expression of SIRPalpha1 in MCF7 specifically suppressed the anchorage-independent growth of the cells. Taken together, our results strongly suggest the function of SIRPalpha1 and 2 as type II tumor suppressors for human breast carcinoma.
- SourceAvailable from: Michinari Hamaguchi[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Phosphorylation of actin-binding proteins plays a pivotal role in the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton to regulate cell migration. Palladin is an actin-binding protein that is phosphorylated by growth factor stimulation; however, the identity of the involved protein kinases remains elusive. In this study, we report that palladin is a novel substrate of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Suppression of ERK activation by a chemical inhibitor reduced palladin phosphorylation, and expression of active MEK alone was sufficient for phosphorylation. In addition, an in vitro kinase assay demonstrated direct palladin phosphorylation by ERK. We found that Ser77 and Ser197 are essential residues for phosphorylation. Although the phosphorylation of these residues was not required for actin cytoskeletal organization, we found that expression of non-phosphorylated palladin enhanced cell migration. Finally, we show that phosphorylation inhibits the palladin association with Abl tyrosine kinase. Taken together, our results indicate that palladin phosphorylation by ERK has an anti-migratory function, possibly by modulating interactions with molecules that regulate cell migration.PLoS ONE 01/2011; 6(12):e29338. · 3.53 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The hormone prolactin (PRL) contributes to the pathogenesis of breast cancer in part through its activation of Janus-activated kinase 2 (Jak2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (Stat5), a PRL receptor (PRLr)-associated pathway dependent on cross-talk signaling from integrins. It remains unclear, however, how this cross-talk is mediated. Following PRL stimulation, we show that a complex between the transmembrane glycoprotein signal regulatory protein-α (SIRPα) and the PRLr, β(1) integrin, and Jak2 in estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) and ER(-) breast cancer cells is formed. Overexpression of SIRPα in the absence of collagen 1 significantly decreased PRL-induced gene expression, phosphorylation of PRLr-associated signaling proteins, and PRL-stimulated proliferation and soft agar colony formation. In contrast, overexpression of SIRPα in the presence of collagen 1 increased PRL-induced gene expression; phosphorylation of Jak2, Stat5, and Erk; and PRL-stimulated cell growth. Interestingly, overexpression of a tyrosine-deficient SIRPα (SIRPα-4YF) prevented the signaling and phenotypic effects mediated by wild-type SIRPα. Furthermore, overexpression of a phosphatase-defective mutant of Shp-2 or pharmacologic inhibition of Shp-2 produced effects comparable with that of SIRPα-4YF. However, the tyrosine phosphorylation of SIRPα was unaffected in the presence or absence of collagen 1. These data suggest that SIRPα modulates PRLr-associated signaling as a function of integrin occupancy predominantly through the alteration of Shp-2 activity. This PRLr-SIRPα-integrin complex may therefore provide a basis for integrin-PRLr cross-talk and contribute to the biology of breast cancer.Molecular Cancer Research 10/2010; 8(10):1413-24. · 4.35 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Normal mammary development requires coordinated interactions of numerous factors, including prolactin (PRL) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), both of which have also been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis and progression. We previously reported that PRL and IGF-I synergize in breast cancer cells to activate ERK1/2 and AKT, leading to increased proliferation, survival, and invasion. Intriguingly, PRL co-treatment with IGF-I augments IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) phosphorylation 2-fold higher than IGF-I alone. Here, we showed the importance of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 in this cross-talk using pharmacological inhibition and small interfering RNA. SHP-2 recruitment to IGF-IR was significantly attenuated by PRL co-treatment. Src family kinase activity was required for IGF-IR association with SHP-2, ligand-induced IGF-IR internalization, and PRL-enhanced IGF-IR phosphorylation. Inhibition of internalization, via knockdown of the GTPase, dynamin-2, prevented not only IGF-IR dephosphorylation, but also PRL-enhanced IGF-IR phosphorylation. Consistently, PRL diminished IGF-I-induced IGF-IR internalization, which may result from reduced SHP-2 association with IGF-IR, because we demonstrated an essential role for SHP-2 in IGF-IR internalization. Together, these findings describe a novel mechanism of cross-talk between PRL and IGF-I in breast cancer cells, with implications for our understanding of tumor progression and potential therapeutic strategies.Journal of Biological Chemistry 03/2010; 285(11):8003-12. · 4.65 Impact Factor