Combination treatment with omalizumab and rush immunotherapy for ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis: Inhibition of IgE-facilitated allergen binding

Upper Respiratory Medicine, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Impact Factor: 11.25). 10/2007; 120(3):688-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.05.034
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The combination of anti-IgE (omalizumab) therapy with ragweed injection immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis results in a significant reduction in systemic side effects and enhanced efficacy compared with immunotherapy alone. One proposed mechanism of immunotherapy is to induce regulatory antibodies that inhibit facilitated antigen presentation.
We sought to determine whether the combination protocol has a cumulative effect on inhibition of facilitated antigen presentation both during and after discontinuation of treatment.
Ragweed allergen immunotherapy with and without omalizumab therapy was tested in a 4-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Flow cytometry was used to detect serum inhibitory activity for IgE-facilitated CD23-dependent allergen binding to B cells as a surrogate marker for facilitated antigen presentation. Serum ragweed-specific IgG4 was measured by means of ELISA.
Immunotherapy alone resulted in partial inhibition of allergen-IgE binding after 5 to 19 weeks of treatment compared with baseline (P < .01). Complete inhibition of allergen-specific IgE binding was observed in both treatment groups receiving omalizumab (P < .001). Allergen-specific IgG4 levels were only increased after immunotherapy (P < .05), both in the presence and absence of anti-IgE treatment. Combined treatment resulted in the induction of long-lasting inhibitory antibody function for up to 42 weeks compared with either treatment alone.
Ragweed immunotherapy induced serum regulatory antibodies that partially blocked binding of allergen-IgE complexes to B cells. Additional treatment with anti-IgE, by directly blocking IgE binding to CD23, completely inhibited allergen-IgE binding.
The combination of ragweed immunotherapy and anti-IgE resulted in prolonged inhibition of allergen-IgE binding compared with either treatment alone, events that might contribute to enhanced efficacy.

Download full-text


Available from: Adam Asare, Aug 15, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma involves securing accurate diagnoses, avoidance measures, pharmacotherapy, and in some patients allergen immunotherapy, with consideration of immunomodulator therapy. At least 20% of patients with asthma have evidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) and others have laryngeal pharyngeal reflux (LPR) also referred to as supraesophageal reflux (SERD) or "atypical reflux." The scientific foundation of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) includes generation of T-reg cells, which generate IL-10 and TGF-beta and suppress T(H2) and T(H1) lymphocyte responses. SCIT alone or even to a greater degree with omalizumab has been shown to reduce the extent of "facilitated allergen presentation" of allergen-IgE complexes binding to B lymphocytes, with the implication of reducing the extent of allergen presentation by B lymphocytes to T lymphocytes. In viewing the concept of the unified airway and the multiple approaches required for optimal patient care, asthma should be considered as a syndrome, which includes the concomitant conditions of allergic rhinitis and GERD (SERD or LPR) with the possibility of intermittent or chronic rhinosinusitis.
    Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 11/2008; 29(6):557-64. DOI:10.2500/aap.2008.29.3168 · 3.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Today inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are regarded as the first-line controller anti-inflammatory treatment in the management of asthma. However, there is an increasing awareness of the risk of long-term adverse effects of ICS and that asthma is not only an organ-specific disease but also a systemic and small airway disease. This thinking has called for systemic treatment alternatives to treat asthma targeting more disease-specific mechanisms without influencing normal physiologic functions. Blocking of disease-specific mediators is a mechanism utilized by anti-leukotrienes and anti-immunoglobulin E treatment, each proven to be effective in both asthma and allergic rhinitis.Different cytokine-modifying strategies have been tested in clinical trials with variable results, some disappointing and some encouraging. Anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibody treatment effectively reduces the number of eosinophils locally in the airways and in peripheral blood in asthmatic patients. Unfortunately, this marked effect on eosinophils was not associated with an improvement in bronchial hyperresponsiveness and/or symptoms. Clinical trials with a recombinant soluble IL-4 receptor have been somewhat more successful at improving asthma control and allowing reduction of ICS therapy in asthma. Treatment with recombinant IL-12 had an effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and eosinophilic response, but was associated with unacceptable adverse effects. Other interesting cytokine-modulating treatments include those targeting IL-9, IL-10, IL-12 and IL-13.Immune-modulating treatment with bacterial antigens represents another strategy, originating from the hypothesis that some bacterial infections guide the immune system towards a T helper (Th) type 1 immune response. Mycobacterium vaccae, Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and immunostimulatory DNA sequences have all been tested in clinical trials, with encouraging results. Future asthma and allergy treatment will probably include not only one but also two or more disease-modifying agents administered to the same patient.
    Treatments in Respiratory Medicine 02/2004; 3(4):235-46. DOI:10.2165/00151829-200403040-00004
  • L Encéphale 08/2006; 32(4):531-535. DOI:10.1016/S0013-7006(06)76199-1 · 0.60 Impact Factor
Show more