Article

Living with prostate cancer: patients' and spouses' psychosocial status and quality of life.

School of Nursing and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0482, USA.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (Impact Factor: 18.04). 10/2007; 25(27):4171-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6503
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite the high prevalence of prostate cancer, little information is available on the quality of life of men and their spouses during the phases of illness. This study assessed patients' and spouses' quality of life, appraisal of illness, resources, symptoms, and risk for distress across three phases of prostate cancer: newly diagnosed, biochemical recurrence, and advanced.
The sample consisted of 263 patient/spouse dyads. A stress-appraisal conceptual model guided the selection of variables which were then assessed with established instruments. Study variables were examined for phase effects (differences in dyads across three phases), role effects (patients v spouses), and phase-by-role interactions (differences within dyads across phases) using analysis of variance (ANOVA).
More phase effects than role effects were found, indicating that the psychosocial experiences of patients and their spouses were similar, but differed from dyads in other phases. Dyads in the advanced phase were at highest risk for distress. These patients had the lowest physical quality of life, and their spouses had the lowest emotional quality of life of all participants. Dyads in the biochemical recurrence and advanced phases had more negative appraisals of illness and caregiving, greater uncertainty, and more hopelessness compared with dyads in the newly diagnosed phase. Spouses, in contrast to patients, had less confidence in their ability to manage the illness and perceived less support across all phases of illness.
Phase-specific programs of care are needed to assist both men with prostate cancer and their spouses to manage the effects of illness.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
79 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Information regarding variability in the type and extent of health services used by elderly patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in the initial period following diagnosis is limited. We evaluated health services utilization among elderly men with stage IV PCa with (M1) and without (M0) distant metastasis during the year following diagnosis. Methods We evaluated patients aged 66 and older with incident stage IV PCa during 2005–2007 using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Measures included skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay, hospice stay, and hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated to determine the association between M1 PCa and each health service. Poisson regression was used to assess hospital length of stay. Results The final sample included 3379 patients (20% M0; 80% M1). In the year following diagnosis, M1 patients had greater use of SNF (M0: 8%; M1: 22%), hospice (M0: 5%; M1: 20%), and hospitalization (M0: 43%; M1: 61%). Compared to M0 patients, M1 patients had statistically significantly higher adjusted odds of SNF use (OR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.38–2.59), hospice use (OR = 3.22; 95% CI = 2.19–4.72), and hospitalization (OR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.20–1.75). Among those hospitalized, M1 patients had 24% longer length of stay (p < 0.01). Conclusions There is 2- to 3-fold greater use of SNF and hospice, and higher hospitalization among M1 compared to M0 patients. Elderly patients with advanced PCa face significant clinical burden within the first year after their diagnosis. Greater understanding of the relationship between clinical disease burden and health services utilization can improve healthcare delivery in this population.
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology 01/2014; · 1.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose/Objectives: To assess the effects of a six-week Vinyasa yoga (VY) intervention on caregivers' overall quality of life (QOL) and psychological distress.Design: A single-group, pre- and post-test pilot study.Setting: University public recreational facility.Sample: 12 informal caregivers for patients with cancer.Methods: Caregivers participated in a six-week VY intervention and completed measures of QOL and psychological distress pre- and postintervention. Program satisfaction was measured with open-ended survey questions.Main Research Variables: QOL, psychological distress, and program satisfaction.Findings: Significant improvements were found in the mental component score of overall QOL and in overall psychological distress. Several subdomains of QOL and psychological distress were also improved significantly. Open-ended survey question responses revealed participants perceived physical and mental benefit from the intervention, highlighting improvements in flexibility, core and upper-body strength, balance, breathing, and energy.Conclusions: Informal caregivers may benefit mentally and physically from participating in VY.Implications for Nursing: Caregivers of patients with cancer characterize a group worthy of attention, research, and interventions focusing on their healthcare needs.
    Oncology Nursing Forum 05/2014; 41(3):257-64. · 1.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Men who undergo surgery for prostate cancer frequently experience significant side-effects including urinary and sexual dysfunction. These difficulties can lead to anxiety, depression and reduced quality of life. Many partners also experience psychological distress. An additional impact can be on the couple relationship, with changes to intimacy, and unmet psychosexual supportive needs in relation to sexual recovery and rehabilitation. The aim of this exploratory randomised controlled trial pilot study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a novel family-relational-psychosexual intervention to support intimacy and reduce distress among couples following prostate cancer surgery and to estimate the efficacy of this intervention.
    Trials. 05/2014; 15(1):183.