Do Physician Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Differ by Patient Age?

Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie (Impact Factor: 1.98). 08/2007; 21(7):435-8.
Source: PubMed


Colorectal cancer screening is underutilized, resulting in preventable morbidity and mortality. In the present study, age-related and other disparities associated with physicians' delivery of colorectal cancer screening recommendations were examined. The present cross-sectional study included 43 physicians and 618 of their patients, aged 50 to 80 years, without past or present colorectal cancer. Of the 285 screen-eligible patients, 45% received a recommendation. Multivariate analyses revealed that, compared with younger nondepressed patients, older depressed patients were less likely to receive fecal occult blood test recommendations, compared with no recommendation (OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.02), as well as less likely to receive colonoscopy recommendations, compared with no recommendation (OR=0.14; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66). Comorbidity and marital status were associated with delivery of fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy recommendations, respectively, compared with no recommendation. In summary, patient age and other characteristics appeared to influence physicians' delivery of colorectal cancer screening and choice of modality.

Download full-text


Available from: Martin Dawes, Oct 08, 2015
26 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The association of marital status and stage of diagnosis in cancer was examined for seven common disease sites. Data were drawn from the New York State Cancer Registry for Brooklyn residents diagnosed between 1978 and 1982. Married persons were found to have a better chance of early diagnosis only for cancers of the breast and prostate. When the analysis was stratified for race, this advantage was limited to whites. Married whites were 1.8 times more likely to be diagnosed with early prostatic cancer (p less than 0.01) and 1.2 times more likely to be diagnosed with early breast cancer (p less than 0.05). The earlier stage of diagnosis may be due to differences in a complex of social, economic, behavioral, and biological factors. These results suggest the need for additional educational and screening programs for the unmarried.
    New York state journal of medicine 02/1992; 92(1):8-11.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is currently little data showing that older adults can derive benefit from cancer screening. Advancing age is associated with an increasing prevalence of cancer and other chronic conditions, or comorbidity, and questions remain about the interactions between comorbidity and cancer screening in the elderly population. In this Review, we assess the available evidence on the effects of comorbidity on cancer screening in elderly individuals. In view of the high heterogeneity of existing data, consistent recommendations cannot be made. Decisions on cancer screening in older adults should be based on an appropriate assessment of each individual's health status and life expectancy, the benefits and harms of screening procedures, and patient preferences. We suggest that Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment might be a necessary step to identify candidates for cancer screening in the elderly population. Specific clinical trials should be done to improve the evidence and show the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in older adults.
    The Lancet Oncology 02/2009; 10(1):80-7. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70336-X · 24.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To increase attendance for colonoscopy among nonadherent high-risk individuals for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in China. During the first 12 mo without intervention, only 428 of the 2398 high-risk subjects attended a scheduled colonoscopy examination. The 1970 subjects who did not attend for CRC screening were enrolled in the present study. Prior barrier investigation was performed to ascertain the reasons for nonadherence. A barrier-focused intervention program was then established and implemented among eligible nonadherent subjects by telephone interviews and on-site consultations. The completion rates of colonoscopy during the first 12 mo without intervention and the second 12 mo with intervention were compared. Variations in the effect of the intervention on some high-risk factors and barrier characteristics were analyzed using logistic regression. 540 subjects who were not eligible were excluded from the study. The colonoscopy attendance rate was 23.04% (428/1858) during the first 12 mo without intervention, and 37.69% (539/1430) during the second 12 mo with intervention (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that the intervention was more effective among subjects with only objective barriers (OR: 34.590, 95% CI: 23.204-51.563) or subjects with some specific high-risk characteristics: first-degree relatives diagnosed with CRC (OR: 1.778, 95% CI: 1.010-3.131), personal history of intestinal polyps (OR: 3.815, 95% CI: 1.994-7.300) and positive result for immunochemical fecal occult blood testing (OR: 2.718, 95% CI: 1.479-4.996). The barrier-focused telephone or on-site consultation intervention appears to be a feasible means to improve colonoscopy attendance among nonadherent high-risk subjects for CRC screening in China.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 08/2009; 15(31):3920-5. · 2.37 Impact Factor
Show more