Dissecting contact potentials for proteins: Relative contributions of individual amino acids

Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0520, USA.
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (Impact Factor: 2.63). 07/2007; 70(1):119-30. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21538
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Knowledge-based contact potentials are routinely used in fold recognition, binding of peptides to proteins, structure prediction, and coarse-grained models to probe protein folding kinetics. The dominant physical forces embodied in the contact potentials are revealed by eigenvalue analysis of the matrices, whose elements describe the strengths of interaction between amino acid side chains. We propose a general method to rank quantitatively the importance of various inter-residue interactions represented in the currently popular pair contact potentials. Eigenvalue analysis and correlation diagrams are used to rank the inter-residue pair interactions with respect to the magnitude of their relative contributions to the contact potentials. The amino acid ranking is shown to be consistent with a mean field approximation that is used to reconstruct the original contact potentials from the most relevant amino acids for several contact potentials. By providing a general, relative ranking score for amino acids, this method permits a detailed, quantitative comparison of various contact interaction schemes. For most contact potentials, between 7 and 9 amino acids of varying chemical character are needed to accurately reconstruct the full matrix. By correlating the identified important amino acid residues in contact potentials and analysis of about 7800 structural domains in the CATH database we predict that it is important to model accurately interactions between small hydrophobic residues. In addition, only potentials that take interactions involving the protein backbone into account can predict dense packing in protein structures.

Download full-text


Available from: Nicolae-Viorel Buchete, Sep 28, 2015
26 Reads
  • Source
    • "The observed large connectivity among the 4 residues (Ala, Ile, Leu, Val) observed in our present work is supported by the findings of Buchete et al. [28]. They present a quantitative analysis of the amino acids pair distributions and their associated contact potentials, comparing some of the contact potentials developed to date. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The protein structure is a cumulative result of interactions between amino acid residues interacting with each other through space and/or chemical bonds. Despite the large number of high resolution protein structures, the "protein structure code" has not been fully identified. Our manuscript presents a novel approach to protein structure analysis in order to identify rules for spatial packing of amino acid pairs in proteins. We have investigated 8706 high resolution non-redundant protein chains and quantified amino acid pair interactions in terms of solvent accessibility, spatial and sequence distance, secondary structure, and sequence length. The number of pairs found in a particular environment is stored in a cell in an 8 dimensional data tensor. When plotting the cell population against the number of cells that have the same population size, a scale free organization is found. When analyzing which amino acid paired residues contributed to the cells with a population above 50, pairs of Ala, Ile, Leu and Val dominate the results. This result is statistically highly significant. We postulate that such pairs form "structural stability points" in the protein structure. Our data shows that they are in buried α-helices or β-strands, in a spatial distance of 3.8-4.3Å and in a sequence distance >4 residues. We speculate that the scale free organization of the amino acid pair interactions in the 8D protein structure combined with the clear dominance of pairs of Ala, Ile, Leu and Val is important for understanding the very nature of the protein structure formation. Our observations suggest that protein structures should be considered as having a higher dimensional organization.
    PLoS ONE 07/2012; 7(7):e41322. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0041322 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our previous calculations for excitation of the 001 state of CO2 by electron impact at 10 eV are corrected for breakdown of the vibrational sudden approximation. This reduces the calculated differential cross sections at scattering angles of 1° and 3° by 41% and 6%, respectively, and the calculated integral cross section by 14%.
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 01/1981; 75(10):5207-5209. DOI:10.1063/1.441876 · 2.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The orientational geometry of residue packing in proteins was studied in the past by superimposing clusters of neighboring residues with several simple lattices (Bagci et al., Proteins 2003;53:56-67; Raghunathan et al., Protein Sci 1997;6:2072-2083). In this work, instead of a lattice we use the regular polyhedron, the icosahedron, as the model to describe the orientational distribution of contacts in clusters derived from a high-resolution protein dataset (522 protein structures with high resolution < 1.5 A). We find that the order parameter (orientation function) measuring the angular overlap of directions in coordination clusters with directions of the icosahedron is 0.91, which is a significant improvement in comparison with the value 0.82 for the order parameter with the face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice. Close packing tendencies and patterns of residue packing in proteins are considered in detail and a theoretical description of these packing regularities is proposed.
    Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics 11/2008; 73(3):730-41. DOI:10.1002/prot.22092 · 2.63 Impact Factor
Show more