Polymorphisms in PTGS1, PTGS2 and IL-10 do not influence colorectal adenoma recurrence in the context of a randomized aspirin intervention trial

Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
International Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.01). 11/2007; 121(9):2001-4. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22942
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Regular use of aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs reduces both the development of colorectal neoplasia and recurrence of colorectal adenoma (CRA). Modulation of the effects of aspirin by genetic factors has been reported, potentially allowing targeting of treatment to individuals most likely to gain benefit. Prostaglandin H synthase 1 (PTGS1) and PTGS2 are key enzymes in prostaglandin synthesis and are inhibited by aspirin, whilst interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an important antiinflammatory cytokine. We investigated whether functional genetic polymorphisms in the PTGS1, PTGS2 and IL-10 genes influence CRA recurrence in individuals participating in a randomized aspirin intervention trial. DNA was available for genotyping from 546 patients who received aspirin (300 mg daily) or placebo for a mean 41-months' duration. Homozygote carriers of variant alleles for the PTGS1 50C>T, PTGS2 -765G>C and IL-10 -592C>A polymorphisms did not have a significantly altered risk of CRA recurrence (relative risk [RR]=0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-6.07, RR=1.32; 95% CI: 0.66-2.62 and RR=1.24; 95% CI: 0.74-2.07, respectively). There were also no significant interactions between aspirin intervention and genotype in determining recurrence risk. These data indicate that these polymorphisms are unlikely to influence CRA recurrence and cannot be used to identify individuals who derive benefit from aspirin intervention.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard F Logan, Oct 06, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cyclooxygenases (COX) are important enzymes not only in the maintenance of mucosal integrity but also in pathological processes, namely in inflammation and tumor development in the gastrointestinal tract. Our goal was to understand whether there is a clear role for COX polymorphisms in gastric and colorectal carcinogenesis. A systematic review was conducted on observational studies assessing the involvement of COX polymorphisms at the onset of gastric or colorectal lesions, retrieved through a MEDLINE database search by May 2008. The dominant genetic model was assumed for each polymorphism and a random-effect model was used for pooling results. Twenty-two studies were retrieved reporting a total of 26 COX polymorphisms (nine in COX1 and 17 in COX2 genes). Carriers of -1329A, -899C alleles, and *429TT genotype revealed increased risk for gastric cancer [odds ratio (OR)=1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-3.10, OR=2.02; 95% CI: 1.00-4.10 and OR=1.34; 95% CI: 1.06-1.71, respectively). For colorectal lesions, the -899G>C and -1329G>A polymorphisms also showed an increased risk for cancer (OR=1.35; 95% CI: 1.01-1.81 and OR=1.36; 95% CI: 1.11-1.66, respectively). Furthermore, C allele carriers of V102V single nucleotide polymorphisms presented a decreased risk for colorectal adenoma onset (OR=0.77; 95% CI: 0.58-1.03). Although further studies, namely cohorts and/or adequately matched case-control studies, are required to unravel the impact of most COX polymorphisms, clearly there are evidences that support the involvement of -899G>C and -1329G>A COX2 polymorphisms in either gastric or colorectal carcinogenesis. These markers could be used to optimize management strategies (follow-up and/or chemoprevention).
    European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 02/2009; 21(1):76-91. DOI:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32830ce7ba · 2.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic inflammation is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), and polymorphisms in genes regulating inflammatory processes appear to alter the risk for neoplasia and the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in CRC chemoprevention. We examined the association between selected inflammation gene polymorphisms and CRC risk. In a large population-based case-control study with 1,795 CRC cases and 1,805 controls from the German DACHS study, we evaluated 5 putative functional inflammatory pathway polymorphisms in PRODH, PTGS1 and UBD genes. PTGS1 G213G was significantly associated with an increased CRC risk [odds ratio (OR), 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.39; p = 0.02] comparing minor allele carriers with major allele homozygotes. This risk estimate was consistent across locations and stages of CRC (range of ORs, 1.15-1.20). Carriage of the minor allele of UBD I68T was significantly associated with advanced stages of CRC and with CRC below 65 years of age (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.45; p = 0.02 and OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05-1.67; p = 0.02, respectively). Our results support a role of variants in inflammatory pathway genes in CRC susceptibility and progression.
    International Journal of Cancer 09/2010; 127(12):2822-30. DOI:10.1002/ijc.25299 · 5.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gene discoveries in cancer have the potential for clinical and public health applications. To take advantage of such discoveries, a translational research agenda is needed to take discoveries from the bench to population health impact. To assess the current status of translational research in cancer genetics, we analyzed the extramural grant portfolio of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) from Fiscal Year 2007, as well as the cancer genetic research articles published in 2007. We classified both funded grants and publications as follows: T0 as discovery research; T1 as research to develop a candidate health application (e.g., test or therapy); T2 as research that evaluates a candidate application and develops evidence-based recommendations; T3 as research that assesses how to integrate an evidence-based recommendation into cancer care and prevention; and T4 as research that assesses health outcomes and population impact. We found that 1.8% of the grant portfolio and 0.6% of the published literature was T2 research or beyond. In addition to discovery research in cancer genetics, a translational research infrastructure is urgently needed to methodically evaluate and translate gene discoveries for cancer care and prevention.
    Public Health Genomics 01/2011; 14(1):1-8. DOI:10.1159/000272897 · 2.46 Impact Factor