Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer.

Program in Cancer Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
BMC Cancer (Impact Factor: 3.33). 02/2007; 7:134. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-134
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Basal-like breast cancer has been extensively characterized on the basis of gene expression profiles, but it is becoming increasingly common for these tumors to be defined on the basis of immunohistochemical (IHC) staining patterns, particularly in retrospective studies where material for expression profiling may not be available. The IHC pattern that best defines basal-like tumors is under investigation and various combinations of ER, PR, HER2-, CK5/6+ and EGFR+ have been tested.
Using datasets from two different hospitals we describe how using different combinations of immunohistochemical patterns has different effects on estimating prognosis at different time intervals after diagnosis. As our baseline, we used two IHC patterns ER-/PR-/HER2-("triple negative phenotype", TNP) and ER-/HER2-/CK5/6+ and/or EGFR+ ("core basal phenotype", CBP).
There was no overall difference in survival between the two hospital-based series, but there was a difference between the TNP and non-TNP groups which was most marked at 3 years (76.8% vs 93.5%, p < .0001). This difference reduced with time, suggesting that long term survivors (beyond 10 years) in the TNP group may have comparable survival to non-TNP cases. A similar difference was seen if CBP was used instead of TNP. However when CK5/6 and/or EGFR expressing tumors were analyzed without consideration of ER/PR status, the reduction in survival increased with time, becoming more pronounced at 10 years than at 3 years.
Our findings suggests that CK5/6 and/or EGFR expressing tumor types have a persistently poorer prognosis over the longer term, an observation that may have important therapeutic implications as drugs that target the EGFR are currently being evaluated in breast cancer.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a special subtype of breast cancer that is characterized by poor prognosis, strong tumor invasion and a high pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The pCR rate is a prognostic factor for TNBC. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between pCR and TNBC after NAC and originally tried to identify factors related to achieving pCR for TNBC using a meta-analysis. We systematically searched the literature for pCR and breast cancer after NAC and carefully identified eligibility criteria. The association between pCR and breast cancer subtypes was estimated using Review Manager, while pCR rates for TNBC and non-TNBC were determined using Meta-Analyst. This analysis included a total of 9,460 cases from 27 studies. The summary odds ratio estimating the relationship between pCR and breast cancer subtypes (TNBC vs non-TNBC) was 3.02 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.66 to 3.42). The TNBC pCR rate was 28.9% (95% CI, 27.0 to 30.8%) and the non-TNBC was 12.5% (95% CI, 11.7 to 13.4%). From subgroup analyses, we identified the factors associated with the highest pCR rates for TNBC. TNBC has a higher pCR rate than non-TNBC. In the NAC setting, these factors of platinum-containing, more than six cycles, four kinds of drugs, 16 weeks' treatment duration and sequential chemotherapy may contribute to increasing the pCR rate.
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology 04/2014; 12(1):95. · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterised by lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2/neu gene amplification. TNBC patients typically present at a younger age, with a larger average tumor size, higher grade and higher rates of lymph node positivity compared to patients with ER/PR-positive tumors. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 regulates the production of prostaglandins and is overexpressed in a variety of solid tumors. In breast cancer, the overexpression of COX-2 is associated with indicators of poor prognosis, such as lymph node metastasis, poor differentiation and large tumor size. Since both TNBC status and COX-2 overexpression are known poor prognostic markers in primary breast cancer, we hypothesized that the COX-2 protein is overexpressed in the primary tumors of TNBC patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there exists an association between TNBC status and COX-2 protein overexpression in primary breast cancer. We prospectively evaluated COX-2 expression levels in primary tumor samples obtained from 125 patients with stage I-III breast cancer treated between February, 2005 and October, 2007. Information on clinicopathological factors was obtained from a prospective database. Baseline tumor characteristics and patient demographics were compared between TNBC and non-TNBC patients using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. In total, 60.8% of the patients were classified as having ER-positive tumors, 51.2% were PR-positive, 14.4% had HER-2/neu amplification and 28.0% were classified as TNBC. COX-2 overexpression was found in 33.0% of the patients. TNBC was associated with COX-2 overexpression (P=0.009), PR expression (P=0.048) and high tumor grade (P=0.001). After adjusting for age, menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), lymph node status and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), TNBC was an independent predictor of COX-2 overexpression (P=0.01). In conclusion, the association between TNBC and COX-2 overexpression in operable breast cancer supports further investigation into COX-2-targeted therapy for patients with TNBC.
    Molecular and clinical oncology. 09/2014; 2(5):845-850.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer with a generally poor prognosis. Due to lack of specific targets for its treatment, an efficient therapy is needed. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), a novel estrogen receptor, has been reported to be expressed in TNBC tissues. In this study, we investigated the effects of blocking non-genomic signaling mediated by the estrogen/GPER pathway on cell viability and motility in the TNBC cells. GPER was strongly expressed in the TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-436, and the estrogen-mediated non-genomic ERK signaling activated by GPER was involved in cell viability and motility of TNBC cells. Treatment with 17β-estradiol (E2), the GPER-specific agonist G-1 and tamoxifen (TAM) led to rapid activation of p-ERK1/2, but not p-Akt. Moreover, estrogen/GPER/ERK signaling was involved in increasing cell growth, survival, and migration/invasion by upregulating expression of cyclinA, cyclinD1, Bcl-2, and c-fos associated with the cell cycle, proliferation, and apoptosis. Immunohistochemical analysis of TNBC specimens showed a significantly different staining of p-ERK1/2 between GPER-positive tissues (58/66, 87.9%) and GPER-negative tissues (13/30, 43.3%). The positivity of GPER and p-ERK1/2 displayed a strong association with large tumor size and poor clinical stage, indicating that GPER/ERK signaling might also contribute to tumor progression in TNBC patients which corresponded with in vitro experimental data. Our findings suggest that inhibition of estrogen/GPER/ERK signaling represents a novel targeted therapy in TNBC.
    The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology. 05/2014;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014