Endothelial sulfonylurea receptor 1-regulated NC Ca-ATP channels mediate progressive hemorrhagic necrosis following spinal cord injury.

Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland at Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland 21201-1595, USA.
Journal of Clinical Investigation (Impact Factor: 13.77). 09/2007; 117(8):2105-13. DOI: 10.1172/JCI32041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) causes progressive hemorrhagic necrosis (PHN), a poorly understood pathological process characterized by hemorrhage and necrosis that leads to devastating loss of spinal cord tissue, cystic cavitation of the cord, and debilitating neurological dysfunction. Using a rodent model of severe cervical SCI, we tested the hypothesis that sulfonylurea receptor 1-regulated (SUR1-regulated) Ca(2+)-activated, [ATP](i)-sensitive nonspecific cation (NC(Ca-ATP)) channels are involved in PHN. In control rats, SCI caused a progressively expansive lesion with fragmentation of capillaries, hemorrhage that doubled in volume over 12 hours, tissue necrosis, and severe neurological dysfunction. SUR1 expression was upregulated in capillaries and neurons surrounding necrotic lesions. Patch clamp of cultured endothelial cells exposed to hypoxia showed that upregulation of SUR1 was associated with expression of functional SUR1-regulated NC(Ca-ATP) channels. Following SCI, block of SUR1 by glibenclamide or repaglinide or suppression of Abcc8, which encodes for SUR1 by phosphorothioated antisense oligodeoxynucleotide essentially eliminated capillary fragmentation and progressive accumulation of blood, was associated with significant sparing of white matter tracts and a 3-fold reduction in lesion volume, and resulted in marked neurobehavioral functional improvement compared with controls. We conclude that SUR1-regulated NC(Ca-ATP) channels in capillary endothelium are critical to development of PHN and constitute a major target for therapy in SCI.


Available from: Volodymyr Gerzanich, Apr 02, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Throughout the body, the extracellular matrix (ECM) provides structure and organization to tissues and also helps regulate cell migration and intercellular communication. In the injured spinal cord (or brain), changes in the composition and structure of the ECM undoubtedly contribute to regeneration failure. Less appreciated is how the native and injured ECM influences intraspinal inflammation and, conversely, how neuroinflammation affects the synthesis and deposition of ECM after CNS injury. In all tissues, inflammation can be initiated and propagated by ECM disruption. Molecules of ECM newly liberated by injury or inflammation include hyaluronan fragments, tenascins, and sulfated proteoglycans. These act as “damage-associated molecular patterns” or “alarmins”, i.e., endogenous proteins that trigger and subsequently amplify inflammation. Activated inflammatory cells, in turn, further damage the ECM by releasing degradative enzymes including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). After spinal cord injury (SCI), destabilization or alteration of the structural and chemical compositions of the ECM affects migration, communication, and survival of all cells – neural and non-neural – that are critical for spinal cord repair. By stabilizing ECM structure or modifying their ability to trigger the degradative effects of inflammation, it may be possible to create an environment that is more conducive to tissue repair and axon plasticity after SCI.
    Experimental Neurology 08/2014; 258. DOI:10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.11.020 · 4.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The field of neuroimmunology is rapidly advancing. There is a growing appreciation for heterogeneity, both in inflammatory composition and region-specific inflammatory responses. This understanding underscores the importance of developing targeted immunomodulatory therapies for treating neurological disorders. Concerning neurotrauma, there is a dearth of publications directly comparing inflammatory responses in the brain and spinal cord after injury. The question therefore remains as to whether inflammatory cells responding to spinal cord vs. brain injury adopt similar functions and are therefore amenable to common therapies. In this review, we address this question while revisiting and modernizing the conclusions from publications that have directly compared inflammation across brain and spinal cord injuries. By examining molecular differences, anatomical variations, and inflammatory cell phenotypes between the injured brain and spinal cord, we provide insight into how neuroinflammation relates to neurotrauma and into fundamental differences between the brain and spinal cord.
    Experimental Neurology 08/2014; 258:112–120. DOI:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.007 · 4.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Blood spinal cord barrier (BSCB) disruption after spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to secondary injury and results in apoptosis of neurons and glia, leading to permanent neurological deficits. Here, we examined the effect of ghrelin on BSCB breakdown and hemorrhage after SCI. After moderate weight-drop contusion injury at T9 spinal cord, ghrelin (80μg/kg) was administered via intraperitoneal injection immediately after SCI and then the same dose of ghrelin was treated every 6h for 1 d. Our data showed that ghrelin treatment significantly inhibited the expression and activation of matrix metalloprotease-9 (MMP-9) at 1 d after SCI. The increases of sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) and transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (TrpM4) expressions at 1h and 8h after SCI respectively were also alleviated by ghrelin treatment. In addition, both BSCB breakdown and hemorrhage at 1 d after injury were significantly attenuated by ghrelin. In parallel, the infiltration of blood cells such as neutrophils and macrophages was inhibited by ghrelin treatment at 1 d and 5 d after SCI respectively. We also found that ghrelin receptor, growth hormone secretagogue receptor-1a (GHS-R1a), was expressed in the blood vessel of normal spinal tissue. Furthermore, the inhibitory effects of ghrelin on hemorrhage and BSCB disruption at 1 d after SCI were blocked by GHS-R1a antagonist, [D-Lys-3]-GHRP-6 (3mg/kg). Thus, these results indicate that the neuroprotective effect by ghrelin after SCI is mediated in part by blocking BSCB disruption and hemorrhage through the down-regulation of SUR1/TrpM4 and MMP-9, which is dependent on GHS-R1a.
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 09/2014; 1842(12). DOI:10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.09.006 · 5.09 Impact Factor