Infant Feeding Patterns in the First 6 Months: An Assessment in Full-term Infants

Department of Pediatrics, Ministry of Health, Israel.
Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition (Impact Factor: 2.63). 09/2007; 45(2):234-9. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31803e1706
Source: PubMed


The infant formula market has grown significantly and offers a wide range of products for the different stages of healthy infant growth. Healthy infants often go through a series of unnecessary changes of formulas. The present study aimed to identify the factors leading to switches to alternative formulas. We studied the feeding patterns in the first 6 months of babies born at term, particularly changes in infant formulas. We also investigated the reasons for choosing the first formula, infant formula changes, the addition of formulas to supplement breast-feeding, and various aspects related to formula thickening.
Two hundred parents of babies ages 6 to 18 months were interviewed. The interviews included a detailed questionnaire and were conducted in child and maternal health care centers.
Forty-seven percent of these infants underwent changes in their formula in the first 6 months of life, most of which (67%) were to another cow's milk-based formula. The main reasons for switching a formula were regurgitation or vomiting (24%) followed by restlessness (18%). Lower z scores at birth and a higher Deltaz2 (z score at the time of the questionnaire minus z score at birth) were associated with significantly more formula changes. The impact of pediatricians and other health care professionals on the choice of infant nutrition was surprisingly negligible.
The most common reason for switching a formula was concern regarding common infantile symptoms or behavior patterns perceived by parents to be related to formula intolerance. The decision to switch formula was usually made by the parents without consulting a health professional.

1 Follower
32 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AIMS This project sought to determine whether advertisements for toddler milk function as de-facto advertising for infant formula in Australia, and whether exposure to these advertisements influences parents’ attitudes towards breastfeeding or formula feeding.DESIGN A mixed methods triangulation model was selected to facilitate thorough investigation of a complex public health issue.METHODS Four studies were conducted simultaneously and the results synthesised at the level of analysis. In-depth interviews were conducted to examine expectant mothers’ understandings of toddler milk advertisements. Content analysis was used to compare the frequency with which advertisements for various formula products and brands appeared in parenting magazines from countries with differing regulations about the marketing of formula milk products. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate the effect of exposure to toddler milk advertising on attitudes and beliefs about breastfeeding and formula feeding. A series of discussion fora were used investigate the influence of advertising on the infant feeding attitudes and beliefs of parents and those who influence them.RESULTS Mothers expecting a first baby perceived toddler milk advertisements to be advertising infant formula and found their claims that formula brands can confer health benefits similar to those mothers associate with breastfeeding to be believable. Toddler milk advertisements occurred with greater frequency in Australian parenting magazines than they did in those from the UK, USA or Canada. Exposure to toddler milk advertising is associated with more positive attitudes towards formula feeding amongst parents who are not university educated. In the absence of accurate, evidence-based information about infant formula, mothers, grandmothers and Child and Family Health Nurses rely on advertising to inform their decisions and advice about infant formula.CONCLUSIONS The Marketing in Australia of Infant Formula: Manufacturers’ and Importers’ Agreement is failing to protect consumers from advertising that minimises the important differences between breastmilk/breastfeeding and formula feeding.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES. Many pediatric patients use complementary and alternative medicine, especially when facing a chronic illness for which treatment options are limited. So far, research on the use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with functional gastrointestinal disease has been scarce. This study was designed to assess complementary and alternative medicine use in children with different gastrointestinal diseases, including functional disorders, to determine which factors predicted complementary and alternative medicine use and to assess the willingness of parents to participate in future studies on complementary and alternative medicine efficacy and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS. The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use was assessed by using a questionnaire for 749 children visiting pediatric gastroenterology clinics of 9 hospitals in the Netherlands. The questionnaire consisted of 35 questions on the child's gastrointestinal disease, medication use, health status, past and future complementary and alternative medicine use, reasons for its use, and the necessity of complementary and alternative medicine research. RESULTS. In this study population, the frequency of complementary and alternative medicine use was 37.6%. A total of 60.3% of this group had used complementary and alternative medicine specifically for their gastrointestinal disease. This specific complementary and alternative medicine use was higher in patients with functional disorders than organic disorders (25.3% vs 17.2%). Adverse effects of allopathic medication, school absenteeism, age ≤ 11 years, and a low effect of conventional treatment were predictors of specific complementary and alternative medicine use. Almost all (93%) of the parents considered it important that pediatricians initiate complementary and alternative medicine research, and 51% of parents were willing to participate in future complementary and alternative medicine trials.
    PEDIATRICS 09/2008; 122(2):e446-51. DOI:10.1542/peds.2008-0266 · 5.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Very fussy or extremely fussy infants were randomized to receive: soy-based formula (Soy: n = 82) or a partially hydrolyzed cow's milk protein (CMP), low-lactose formula (PHF: n = 77) in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, prospective 28-day feeding trial. Body weight and infant formula tolerance were reported. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. A significant reduction in mean scores of fussiness, gas, spit-up, and crying compared with baseline measures was observed in infants who received either Soy or PHF within 1 day of formula intake; improvement in symptoms was sustained by study end. Stool consistency remained constant through day 28 in the PHF group, whereas stools in the Soy group became more firm by day 2 and did not return to prestudy consistency. PHF, with a protein profile patterned more closely on human breast milk, improved symptoms of formula intolerance as well as soy-based formula.
    Clinical Pediatrics 11/2008; 48(1):58-65. DOI:10.1177/0009922808321897 · 1.15 Impact Factor
Show more