Estimation of light interception properties of conifer shoots by an improved photographic method and a 3D model of shoot structure.

Nicholas School of Environmental & Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0328, USA.
Tree Physiology (Impact Factor: 3.41). 11/2007; 27(10):1375-87. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/27.10.1375
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The spherical mean of the shoot silhouette-to-total leaf area ratio (STAR) and the shoot transmission coefficient (c) are two key structural parameters in radiative transfer models for calculating canopy photosynthesis and leaf area index. The standard optical method for estimating these parameters might introduce errors in the estimates for species with flexible shoots and needles by changing shoot inclination relative to its inclination in situ. We devised and tested two methods to address this problem. First, we modified the standard optical method by designing an apparatus that allows shoots to be photographed in their original orientation. Second, we developed a faster, model-based approach to replace photography and tested the results against the established approach. We used shoots of three pine species, Pinus echinata Mill. (needle length ~50 mm), P. taeda L. (~150 mm) and P. palustris Mill. (~300 mm). Values of the parameters simulated by the model were similar to those measured from the photographs. In our data, STAR varied about twofold among the pine species and was ~40% higher in shade shoots than in sun shoots of P. taeda. The transmission coefficient for P. taeda shade shoots was also ~40% higher than that of sun shoots of all three species. We tested the versatility of the model by employing it on shoots of two other pine species (P. strobus L. and P. thumbergiana Parl.) as well as on shoots of Tsuga canadensis L. Carr. and Picea pungens Engelm. Regardless of shoot characteristics, the model generated values of shoot structural parameters similar to those estimated with the optical method. Although species-specific and vertical gradients in parameter values are best for modeling radiative transfer in conifer canopies, our results suggest that, in the absence of adequate data, STAR can be approximated as 0.16 for a wide range of shoot structures. For applications requiring angle-dependent parameterization, our new model facilitates rapid generation of these radiative transfer parameters.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Continuous cover forestry (CCF) aims at enhancing stand structural diversity and favouring natural regeneration. To give guidance on how to manage a CCF stand to achieve seedling growth below canopy, an estimate of light transmittance is required. So far, in the UK, only stand-level parameters have been used by managers to predict the understorey light in CCF stands. We assessed a UK Sitka spruce stand undergoing transformation to CCF and measured canopy transmittance using hemispherical pictures. Stand-level characteristics were found to be highly stand specific and not appropriate to predict seedling growth in CCF stands. We parameterized a detailed light model (4C-A-RTM) and a simple one-layer turbid medium model (BL). A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the effect of key stand structural parameters on the modelled transmittance. Measured transmittance from hemispherical photographs was used to validate the models. Both models tended to underestimate canopy transmittance but were positively related to current-year growth of the below canopy seedlings (R(2) = 0.92, P < 0.001). Comparison of the two models showed that the 4C-A-RTM provided a better estimation of light transmittance across observed canopy structural differences. Furthermore, the inclusion of stand characteristics in the 4C-A-RTM is likely to confer greater applicability across stands.
    Forestry 09/2011; 84(4-4):397-409. DOI:10.1093/forestry/cpr026 · 1.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The amount of green leaf area, quantified by the leaf area index (LAI), is one of the key factors determining ecosystem net primary production and energy exchange between land surfaces and the atmosphere. LAI can be measured indirectly using optical methods that are based on the tight relationship between LAI and canopy light transmittance, or through allometric regression models. Until now there has been very little research to compare LAI estimated by the two different approaches. In this study we compare optically-based estimates of LAI to estimates produced using local foliage biomass models for three boreal tree species. Our study is based on 661 Scots pine, Norway spruce and Silver birch stands in the southern boreal zone in Finland. Routine stand inventory and LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer measurements were performed in all stands. We used three allometric foliage mass models to calculate foliage masses for each stand. The foliage mass estimates were then converted to LAI using specific leaf area (SLA) values. A theoretical stem diameter distribution was also used together with the only diameter-dependent foliage mass models. Optical LAI was corrected for shoot-level clumping (i.e., the clumping of needles into shoots). Finally, we estimated LAI from measured canopy gap fractions by inverting a canopy radiation model. Allometric foliage mass models produced significantly different foliage mass estimates (and the LAI estimates based on them). Among the allometric methods, however, the most sophisticated in terms of input tree variables agreed fairly well with each other and also with the clumping-corrected optical methods. The results indicate a need for caution when using foliage biomass or LAI estimates calculated using different models, especially if the estimates are to be used as an input for other models. The simple shoot-level clumping correction of optical LAI showed the best fit with allometric LAI. Our results support the use of a simple shoot-level clumping correction instead of more complicated correction methods in optical LAI estimation in coniferous forests.
    Forest Ecology and Management 03/2013; 292:10-18. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.017 · 2.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The global network FLUXNET supplies environmental scientists with valuable data on ecosystem exchange processes along with meteorological measurements. Ecosystem charac- teristics at these sites can be efficiently complemented by remote sensing data from the MODIS sensors on-board the NASA satellites Terra and Aqua. The ORNL DAAC makes resampled MODIS key products as so called ’Land Product Subsets’ available. These subsets comprise selected MODIS products in a 7x7 km grid centered on FLUXNET sites. One of these products is the leaf area index (LAI). Despite the frequent application of MODIS LAI data in ecosystem models, there is still no consensus on its usage and the employment of the additionally provided quality criteria (QC). In this study, we analyze the effects of various QC filters, spatial aggre- gations and sensor choices on magnitude and temporal dynamics of LAI data at six FLUXNET sites. Additionally, we assess the sensitivity of a simple soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer (SVAT) model on differently post-processed LAI times series. It is found that it is advantageous to combine the products of both sensors. The consideration of quality assessments is essential, but the QC application is not straightforward for forest sites and the QC choice can have signif- icant effects on the resulting LAI time series with considerable consequences on the outcome of subsequently applied SVAT models.
    Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 11/2010; 4(1):043557. DOI:10.1117/1.3524265 · 0.89 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 15, 2014