Relative strength of the tibia and fibula and locomotor behavior in hominoids

Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0383, USA.
Journal of Human Evolution (Impact Factor: 3.73). 01/2008; 53(6):647-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.05.007
Source: PubMed


The fibula has rarely been considered in comparative morphological studies, probably due to its relatively minor role in carrying mechanical loads. However, some differences in morphology (and inferred function) of the fibula between humans and apes, and within apes, have been noted and related to differences in positional behavior. Therefore, the study of tibiofibular relations may be useful in characterizing such differences. This study examines cross-sectional geometric (CSG) properties (cortical area and polar section modulus, Z(p)) of the tibia and fibula at mid-diaphysis across a sample (n=87) of humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, and gibbons. The fibula is compared against the tibia in the different taxa. The results indicate that the robusticity of the fibula relative to that of the tibia can be explained in terms of differences in positional behavior. In particular, hominoids that are more arboreal (i.e., gibbons, orangutans, and chimpanzees) possess a relatively more robust fibula than do hominoids that are more terrestrial (i.e., gorillas and humans). The difference appears to be a consequence of the more mobile fibula and more adducted position of the hindlimb necessary in an arboreal environment. Apart from providing the first CSG data on the fibula, these results may be helpful in reconstructing the locomotor behavior of fossil hominoids.

Download full-text


Available from: Damiano Marchi,
  • Source
    • "Specifically, apes are expected to differ from humans in the anterior regions, based on observations of weight bearing on a highly dorsiflexed ankle during climbing (DeSilva, 2009). Also, apes are expected to differ from humans in the lateral regions, based on the varus angle of the ankle joint during terrestrial locomotion, and greater load transmission from the fibula (Marchi, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Among the structural properties of trabecular bone, the degree of anisotropy is most often found to separate taxa with different habitual locomotor modes. This study examined the degree of anisotropy, the elongation, and primary orientation of trabecular bone in the KNM-ER 1464 Early Pleistocene hominin talus as compared with extant hominoid taxa. Modern human tali were found to have a pattern of relatively anisotropic and elongated trabeculae on the lateral aspect, which was not found in Pan, Gorilla, Pongo, or KNM-ER 1464. Trabecular anisotropy in the fossil talus most closely resembled that of the African apes except for a region of high anisotropy in the posteromedial talus. The primary orientation of trabeculae in the anteromedial region of KNM-ER 1464 was strikingly different from that of the great apes and very similar to that of modern humans in being directed parallel to the talar neck. These results suggest that, relative to that of modern humans, the anteromedial region of the KNM-ER 1464 talus may have transmitted body weight to the midfoot in a similar manner while the lateral aspect may have been subjected to more variable loading conditions.
    Journal of Human Evolution 04/2013; 64(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.03.003 · 3.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Tibial morphology includes information about phylogenetic history, mode of locomotion, and substrate preference because the tibia is the element transmitting body weight from the condyles of the femur to the foot (Lewis, 1989; Ruff, 2002). Differences between human and ape tibiae are often described qualitatively (Fig. 1a) or with simple measurements (e.g., Stern and Susman, 1983; Tardieu, 1981; Senut and Tardieu, 1985; Jungers, 1987; Stern, 2000; Marchi, 2007). Those differences are mainly attributed to different locomotor modes: bipedalism , arboreal or terrestrial quadrupedalism, and suspensory behavior. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Procrustes-based geometric morphometrics (GM) is most often applied to problems of craniofacial shape variation. Here, we demonstrate a novel application of GM to the analysis of whole postcranial elements in a study of 77 hominoid tibiae. We focus on two novel methodological improvements to standard GM approaches: 1) landmark configurations of tibiae including 15 epiphyseal landmarks and 483 semilandmarks along articular surfaces and muscle insertions along the tibial shaft and 2) an artificial affine transformation that sets moments along the shaft equal to the sum of the moments estimated in the other two anatomical directions. Diagrams of the principal components of tibial shapes support most differences between human and non-human primates reported previously. The artificial affine transformation proposed here results in an improved clustering of the great apes that may prove useful in future discriminant or clustering studies. Since the shape variations observed may be related to different locomotor behaviors, posture, or activity patterns, we suggest that this method be used in functional analyses of tibiae or other long bones in modern populations or fossil specimens. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    American Journal of Physical Anthropology 12/2012; 149(4). DOI:10.1002/ajpa.22177 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Conversely, Pan shows a decrease in axial strength relative to torsional and average bending rigidity compared to modern humans. Multi-oriented bending loads and dynamic and propulsive movements associated with quadrupedal locomotion and arborealism increase bending and torsion in the femur, which may explain the decrease in axial strength relative to torsional and average bending rigidity in the Pan proximal femur (Carlson, 2005; Kalmey and Lovejoy, 2002; Kimura, 1995; Marchi, 2007; Ruff and Runestad, 1992). Additionally, the flexed hip and knee position in Pan acts to increase bending moments along the femoral diaphysis because the alignment between the limb segment and ground reaction force is decreased, and the moment arm of the ground reaction force relative to the moment arm of the muscle is increased (Biewener, 1989, 2005; Kimura, 1987; Schmitt, 1999; Sockol et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Functional adaptations in femora attributed to Orrorin tugenensis provide a unique opportunity to examine locomotor behavior very early in the hominin lineage. This study examines relative cortical thickness, cortical area (CA) relative to the polar moment of area (J), and J relative to femoral head superoinferior diameter (FHD) in the proximal femur of O. tugenensis (BAR 1002'00 and BAR 1003'00), and compares patterns in this early hominin with those in a sample of modern humans (N=31), Plio-Pleistocene fossil hominins (N=8), Pan troglodytes troglodytes (N=13), and Pan paniscus (N=3). Relative cortical thickness and CA relative to J in the proximal femur of O. tugenensis are comparable to patterns generally found in other fossil hominins. Proximal femoral diaphyseal J relative to FHD in BAR 1002'00 is similar to patterns found in fossil hominins typically attributed to a non-Homo genus (i.e. SK 82, SK 97, and KNM-ER 738). Cross-sectional geometric patterns in the proximal femur of Orrorin are not unlike those generally found in australopithecines and fossil Homo. While the results of this study cannot confirm unequivocally that Orrorin was an obligate biped, a mode of locomotion comparable to that proposed for australopithecines cannot be ruled out.
    Homo: internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen 05/2012; 63(3):153-66. DOI:10.1016/j.jchb.2012.03.002 · 0.96 Impact Factor
Show more