Article

Does volume directly affect outcome in vascular surgical procedures?

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.82). 11/2007; 34(4):386-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.06.013
Source: PubMed
0 Bookmarks
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vascular surgery has been widely practiced in hospitals within a general surgical service, although the consequent workload of individual vascular units has been small. There is an increasing body of evidence in favor of a positive relationship between hospital and surgeon volumes and the outcome of arterial surgery. These relationships suggest that vascular surgical procedures might be best placed within a centralized model of care to increase volume and thereby attain best outcomes. This systematic review appraises the current evidence for volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery from a number of healthcare systems to examine the basis for centralization of vascular surgical services. The index procedures addressed in this review are open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), ruptured AAA, descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, along with carotid endarterectomy and lower extremity arterial bypass.
    Journal of Endovascular Therapy 06/2010; 17(3):356-65. · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery 01/2011; 41 Suppl 1:S1-S58. · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We are motivated by the need to derive simple control-oriented models of complex systems. Briefly, complex systems are a collection of systems that are not approximable (arbitrarily closely) by a finitely parameterized collection of systems. The study of system identification for such classes of systems has received considerable attention in the past few years. In this paper a new formulation of the system identification problem, which balances between the set-membership and probabilistic approaches is presented. The salient feature of the formulation is that we distinguish between the two principal sources of error encountered in the input-output data-noise and unmodeled dynamics. Unmodeled dynamics arise from the fact that the finitely parameterized model that we seek does not truly characterize the real system. Therefore, unmodeled dynamics are “modeled” as the residual error between the parametric model and the real system. This viewpoint leads to a decomposition between the parametric model class and unmodeled dynamics. In contrast noise is modeled so that it is uncorrelated (in a deterministic or a stochastic sense) from the input. The identification problem deals with obtaining the appropriate finite parametric model from input-output data. The identification problem is studied for several different norms including l<sub>1</sub> and H<sub>∞</sub>. One of the chief outcomes is a new notion of a persistent input and showing that there are both deterministic and stochastic inputs which meet the new criterion
    Decision and Control, 1997., Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on; 01/1998