Association between Serum Concentrations of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Self-Reported Cardiovascular Disease Prevalence: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2002

Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Promotion Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Environmental Health Perspectives (Impact Factor: 7.03). 08/2007; 115(8):1204-9. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10184
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is now increasing evidence that exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) can contribute to the development of inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis.
The objective of this study was to examine associations of serum concentrations of POPs with self-reported history of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Cross-sectional associations of serum POPs concentrations with the prevalence of self-reported CVD were investigated in 889 adults >or= 40 years of age in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002. We selected 21 POPs [3 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), 3 polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), 5 dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), 6 nondioxin-like PCBs, and 4 organochlorine (OC) pesticides] because they were detectable in >or= 60% of participants.
Dioxin-like PCBs, nondioxin-like PCBs, and OC pesticides were positively associated with the prevalence of CVD only among females. Compared with those in the lowest quartile of serum concentration, the odds ratios for CVD across increasing quartiles were 0.9, 2.0, and 5.0 for dioxin-like PCBs (p for trend < 0.01), 1.2, 1.2, and 3.8 for nondioxin-like PCBs (p for trend < 0.01), and 1.9, 1.7, and 4.0 for OC pesticides (p for trend = 0.03). PCDDs showed positive trends with the prevalence of CVD in both males and females; adjusted odds ratios were 1.4, 1.7, and 1.9 (p for trend = 0.07, males and females combined).
Our findings need to be carefully interpreted because of the cross-sectional design and use of self-reported CVD. Prospective studies are needed to clarify these associations.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) is linked to many chronic diseases, including diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Among several possible mechanisms are gradual glutathione depletion and mitochondrial dysfunction after chronic exposure to very low doses of POP mixtures. However, it is biologically noteworthy that glutathione status and mitochondrial function is subject to hormesis, defined broadly as mild stress-induced stimulation of cellular protective mechanisms, including increased synthesis of glutathione and promotion of mitochondrial biogenesis. Although high levels of reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS) can cause cellular damage, certain levels of ROS function as signalling molecules to induce hormetic effects. Thus, similar to many other stressors generating ROS, glutathione status and mitochondrial function can be improved at higher POP doses. However, higher POP levels are dangerous despite their hormetic effects due to other adverse phenomena. Also, the persistent nature of POPs can make hormetic effects less effective in humans as hormesis may be the most active with transient stressors. Hormesis-inducing stressors should be placed into three categories for public health purposes: (1) disadvantageous: chemicals like POPs and radiation, that could harm humans by endocrine disruption, action of chemical mixtures and susceptible populations; (2) neutral: cold, heat, and gravity; and (3) advantageous: moderate exercise, phytochemical intake, and calorie restriction. Noting that regulation of POPs, while critical, has provided insufficient protection because POPs persist in human bodies and the food chain, advantageous stressors should be used by the public to mitigate glutathione depletion and mitochondrial dysfunction due to POPs.
    Journal of Epidemiology &amp Community Health 09/2014; 69(3). DOI:10.1136/jech-2014-203861 · 3.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increases in the body weight of people in Australia and other countries around the world have been the subject of intense scientific, political and media attention in recent years. The placement of body weight at the focal point of discourse about health is referred to as the ‘weight-centred health paradigm’. This paradigm has become dominant in public health policy in the developed English speaking world but has been subjected to intense critique on philosophical, ethical and empirical grounds. Many of the strategies used in weight-related public health initiatives are enacted through the discipline of health promotion. Health promotion is the process of working collaboratively with people to enhance the health of individuals, groups, communities and populations using a broad range of strategies. Health promotion is the spearhead of the new public health, and is explicitly based on a set of values and principles. Health promotion practice that is underpinned by the values and principles of best practice health promotion has been termed modern health promotion. Health promotion underpinned by values and principles not consistent with best practice has been termed traditional health promotion. Despite the major role of health promotion in implementing weight-related public health initiatives, these initiatives have received little critique in relation to the extent to which such initiatives reflect the values and principles of modern or best practice health promotion. This research project addressed that gap. The research questions for the project were: what are the discourses within weight-related public health initiatives in Australia; and to what extent do weight-related public health initiatives in Australia reflect the values and principles of health promotion? The research epistemology was constructivist, the theoretical perspective was critical theory, and the theoretical framework was Critical Systems Heuristics. Critical discourse analysis was used to examine ten weight-related public health initiatives commissioned or produced by the Australian Government or parliament between 2003 and 2013. The health promotion values and principles continuum provided heuristic support for critical reflection. From analysis of the claims, values, assumptions, power relationships and ideologies that were explicit, implicit, suppressed or hidden within the initiatives, I identified a broad range of discourses. The hegemonic but lexically questionable discourse of preventative health resulted in the almost complete invisibilisation of the discipline of health promotion. It also provided the foundation for alarmist, biomedical, reductionist discourses about body weight and health, with minimal attention to the social determinants of health, social justice and equity. Individuals were assumed to be naturally ignorant about the behavioural determinants of body weight but nonetheless to have ultimate responsibility for choosing these behaviours and thereby improving their health. Weight-related public health strategies adopted a mixed approach focusing on the whole population as well as the militarist targeting of negative, deficit-based interventions towards specific groups within the community. Discourse related to potential harm was minimal despite the significant potential for harm inherent in the public health initiatives. Discourse regarding evaluation of the initiatives focused on changes in behaviours and disease rates. The documents relied on the power, authority and status of experts to present uncontested discourses around body weight and public health responses to it. On the basis of these discourses, I determined that the weight-related public health initiatives were reflective of two modern and seven traditional health promotion values and principles related to why the weight-related public health initiatives were needed, and two modern and 11 traditional health promotion values and principles related to what weight-related public health strategies were proposed and implemented in the weight-related public health initiatives. Overall, the weight-related public health initiatives were not consistent with the values and principles of health promotion best practice. This project will contribute to the greater body of systemic change being implemented by social justice, fat acceptance and Health at Every Size advocates and activists, fat studies and critical weight studies scholars and others who are engaged in the enterprising task of shifting society from the weight-centred to a weight-neutral health paradigm, and thereby improving the health and wellbeing of people of all sizes.
    08/2014, Degree: PhD, Supervisor: Margaret Barnes
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Production of food crops is severely constrained by damage from pests which is mainly managed by the use of infallible remedy called pesticides. The use of pesticides was introduced in India during the mid-sixties as a part of green revolution and malaria prevention programs. While pesticides turned useful for pest control they were at the same time responsible for human health injuries. Today these chemicals in particular those which accumulate in food chain, impose several human health hazards. Intake of food containing pesticide residues is documented to result in highest exposure, about 103–105 times higher than that arising from contaminated drinking water or air. Pesticides have been reported to cause several adverse health effects which depend on the extent and duration of exposure. Health effects of pesticides range from mild allergies, rashes, breathing difficulties, neurotoxicity and reproductive abnormalities to deadly chronic diseases like cancer. This challenge to food safety may be addressed by preventive strategies which include the use of alternative sustainable agricultural practices or mitigating strategies which are based on reducing pesticide exposure from food and water by different processing techniques.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India - Section B: Biological Sciences 06/2014; 85(2). DOI:10.1007/s40011-014-0388-6 · 0.40 Impact Factor

Preview (3 Sources)

1 Download
Available from