Article

Variation in Adherence to External Beam Radiotherapy Quality Measures Among Elderly Men With Localized Prostate Cancer

Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics (Impact Factor: 4.18). 01/2008; 69(5):1456-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.020
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To characterize the variation in adherence to quality measures of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer and its relation to patient and provider characteristics in a population-based, representative sample of U.S. men.
We evaluated EBRT quality measures proposed by a RAND expert panel of physicians among men aged >or=65 years diagnosed between 2000 and 2002 with localized prostate cancer and treated with primary EBRT using data from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare program. We assessed the adherence to five EBRT quality measures that were amenable to analysis using SEER-Medicare data: (1) use of conformal RT planning; (2) use of high-energy (>10-MV) photons; (3) use of custom immobilization; (4) completion of two follow-up visits with a radiation oncologist in the year after therapy; and (5) radiation oncologist board certification.
Of the 11,674 patients, 85% had received conformal RT planning, 75% had received high-energy photons, and 97% had received custom immobilization. One-third of patients had completed two follow-up visits with a radiation oncologist, although 91% had at least one visit with a urologist or radiation oncologist. Most patients (85%) had been treated by a board-certified radiation oncologist.
The overall high adherence to EBRT quality measures masked substantial variation in geography, socioeconomic status in the area of residence, and teaching affiliation of the RT facility. Future research should examine the reasons for the variations in these measures and whether the variation is associated with important clinical outcomes.

0 Followers
 · 
65 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present work deals with the investigation of the pulse shaper based on a shorted symmetrical strip line. It has been determined that the best balancing and minimum afterpulse oscillations are provided in the pulse shaper where at first short pulses are formed and then balancing of the output signal is performed. The best strobe pulse shaper is a shaper with ferrite that has a larger relative permeability. The suitable design of the line-balance converter for the 100 ps strobe pulse shaping was obtained.
    Ultrawideband and Ultrashort Impulse Signals, 2004 Second International Workshop; 10/2004
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The synthesis problems for two types of antennas are considered on the additional requirement of the electromagnetic compatibility. The variational statement of the synthesis problems consists in minimization of functional presented the mean-square deviation of the prescribed and synthesized amplitude radiation patterns together with additional summand that allows to minimize the field values in a near zone. The other functional allows to maximize the front-to-rear factor in the given range of frequencies and to minimize it outside of this range. The solutions of analysis problems are presented in explicit notation or as series of computing procedures that to a considerable degree simplifies the process of solving the synthesis problems.
    Ultrawideband and Ultrashort Impulse Signals, 2004 Second International Workshop; 10/2004
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The essence of comparative effectiveness research (CER) is to understand what health interventions work, for which patients, and under what conditions. The objective of this article is to introduce the relative strengths and weaknesses of several forms of evidence to illustrate the potential for CER evidence generation within radiation oncology. We introduce the underlying concepts of effectiveness and efficacy. We describe the design of traditional explanatory randomized trials (RCTs). We introduce the rationale, strengths, and weaknesses of several alternative study designs for comparative effectiveness, including pragmatic clinical trials, adaptive trials, and observational (nonrandomized) studies. Explanatory RCTs are designed to assess the efficacy of an intervention while achieving a high degree of internal validity. Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are prospective studies performed in typical, real-world clinical practice settings. The emphasis of PCTs is to maintain a degree of internal validity while also maximizing external validity. Adaptive trials can be modified at interim stages using existing or evolving evidence in the course of a trial, which may allow trials to maintain clinical relevance by studying current treatments. Observational data are becoming increasingly important, given substantial funding for clinical registries and greater availability of electronic medical records and claims databases, but need to address well-known limitations such as selection bias. With the rapid proliferation of new and evolving radiotherapy technologies, it is incumbent upon our field to invest in building the evidence base for radiotherapy CER and to actively participate in current initiatives for generating comparative evidence.
    04/2011; 1(2):72-80. DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2011.02.001
Show more