Sometimes doing the right thing sucks: frame combinations and multi-fetal pregnancy reduction decision difficulty.

Department of Health and Sports Sciences, College of Education and Human Development, University of Louisville, USA.
Social Science [?] Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.56). 01/2008; 65(11):2342-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.026
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Data are analyzed for 54 women who made an appointment with a North American Center specializing in multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) to be counseled and possibly have a reduction. The impact on decision difficulty of combinations of three frames through which patients may understand and consider their options and use to justify their decisions are examined: a conceptional frame marked by a belief that life begins at conception; a medical frame marked by a belief in the statistics regarding risk and risk prevention through selective reduction; and a lifestyle frame marked by a belief that a balance of children and career has normative value. All data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and observation during the visit to the center over an average 2.5h period. Decision difficulty was indicated by self-assessed decision difficulty and by residual emotional turmoil surrounding the decision. Qualitative comparative analysis was used to analyze the impact of combinations of frames on decision difficulty. Separate analyses were conducted for those reducing only to three fetuses (or deciding not to reduce) and women who chose to reduce below three fetuses. Results indicated that for those with a non-intense conceptional frame, the decision was comparatively easy no matter whether the patients had high or low values of medical and lifestyle frames. For those with an intense conceptional frame, the decision was almost uniformly difficult, with the exception of those who chose to reduce only to three fetuses. Simplifying the results to their most parsimonious scenarios oversimplifies the results and precludes an understanding of how women can feel pulled in different directions by the dictates of the frames they hold. Variations in the characterization of intense medical frames, for example, can both pull toward reduction to two fetuses and neutralize shame and guilt by seeming to remove personal responsibility for the decision. We conclude that the examination of frame combinations is an important tool for understanding the way women carrying multiple fetuses negotiate their way through multi-fetal pregnancies, and that it may have more general relevance for understanding pregnancy decisions in context.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 1978, the world's first "test-tube" baby was born via in vitro fertilization (IVF). The last thirty years have seen the rapid evolution of many other assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), some simple variants of IVF, while others bridge the fields of assisted reproduction and human genomics. As ARTs have evolved over time, so have social, cultural, legal, and ethical responses to them. The major theme of this essay is the extent to which the ARTs are leading to culture change. ARTs ramify in many areas of social life, including the traditional anthropological domains of kinship, marriage and the family, gender, religion, and biomedicine. This review highlights the prolific scholarship of more than fifty anthropologists studying ARTs around the globe. Their research bespeaks both the destabilizing and generative impacts of ARTs at the interface between science and society.
    Annual Review of Anthropology 06/2008; 37. DOI:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085230 · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fetal reduction (FR) began in the 1980s to salvage the pregnancies of couples needing fertility therapy who were finally successful but with too many fetuses. Since then, it has gone from a rarity performed in only the highest risk situations to an integral fail-safe of infertility practice. Our understanding of the problems of multiple and premature births has increased - even twins carry 4-5 times more risk than singletons. Evaluation of fetuses before FR has permitted more intelligent choices and improved resultant outcomes. We now perform chorionic villus sampling in approximately 85% of cases, obtain fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) results overnight, and then perform FR the next day. Decisions about which to reduce prioritize anomalies, but now can include fetal gender in the decision process, as couples are now just as likely to want girls as boys. In Mendelian cases, sophisticated molecular analyses permit diagnoses before FR, and new uses such as paternity analysis can be performed. Ethical arguments have also evolved; as with many technologies in which the start was for only 'life or death cases', FR has also moved into 'quality of life' issues. FR of twins to a singleton now compromise about 30% of our cases. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 02/2014; 35(2):69-82. DOI:10.1159/000357974 · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Gestational carriers and egg donors have been used by 'traditional' and now increasingly, gay couples. Three gay male couples, all using egg donors and gestational carriers with semen from both partners, had triplets. All desired reductions to twins for the standard medical indications, but requested, if reasonably possible, to have twins with one fathered by each partner. Methods: Following our usual clinical protocol, we performed chorionic villus sampling at 12 weeks on all fetuses obtaining FISH and karyotype. For paternity analysis, 14 polymorphic molecular markers on villi were compared to DNA samples from the two men to include or exclude each. Results: Standard assessments were all normal. Paternity testing showed that one partner fathered two of the triplets, and the other one. In all cases, one of the 'twins' was reduced with good clinical outcomes ensuing. Conclusions: Paternity balancing increases options for satisfying family planning desires of gay male couples. We believe it comparable to gender preferences in reductions, i.e. it can be considered but only completely subservient to any clinical criteria. Paternity balancing raises similar ethical issues as reduction with gender preferences, but may increase patient autonomy and mainstream acceptance of stable, gay families.
    Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 08/2013; 34(3). DOI:10.1159/000351857 · 2.30 Impact Factor


Available from
May 30, 2014